(ThyBlackMan.com) The vast majority of people in this country – both Black, White, and others – are good people. While we all have a strain of racism in us, it’s not a conscious racism, and most of us of normal intelligence are engaged a constant internal struggle eradicate it when we recognize it in ourselves. What makes it such a struggle is we’re constantly inundated by it in this country, and the reason we try so desperately to weed it out is, being of normal intelligence, we see it for what it is – a form of gross stupidity.
.
But as a Black man – one who has three mixed grandsons, including Eric Wattree III, and a daughter-n-law who is so pure in her White heritage that she makes Mitt Romney look like an Angolan immigrant – I’ve found the debate over the George Zimmerman verdict very enlightening. I used to think that racism was a choice, but now I see that there is a group of people, of normally good conscience, in this country whose racist strain is so innate to who they are that they are completely blind to it. They don’t intend to be racist, nevertheless, their racist attitudes and assumptions seep all the way to their bone marrow. We’ve seen a clear example of that in the Zimmerman verdict.
.
It takes either racism or a complete lack of common sense not to clearly recognize that racism played a huge role in both George Zimmerman’s motives, and his intent. First, the only thing that caught Zimmerman’s attention about Trayvon Martin was the fact that he was a Black male. Secondly, Zimmerman contacted 911 more than 40 times, and virtually every call involved Black males. Third, George Zimmerman was instructed to remain in his car, and he ignored those instructions. Fourth, George Zimmerman claimed he murdered Trayvon in self-defense, but regardless to what took place after he approached Trayvon, Zimmerman had to approach Trayvon to place himself in a position to require him to have to defend himself.
And fifth, George Zimmerman claimed that he had to resort to lethal force because Trayvon, who weighed 40 pounds less than him, was banging his head against the concrete so vigorously that it caused him to fear for his life. Yet, all he had to show for this brutal assault were a few scratches, not the huge lumps on his head that you would expect from a person whose head had been banged against concrete.
.
Thus, I feel safe in saying that no parent in America – Black or White – would find that anywhere close to a justifiable excuse for the murder of their child – a child who was doing nothing more criminal than going to the store to get a bag of Skittles. So I submit that it takes either gross racism or gross stupidity to accept such a story as a justification for murder.
.
In order for people to accept such a story they have to also accept the fact that,
1) simply because Trayvon was Black was an acceptable reason for Zimmerman to suspect him of criminal activity.
2) Again, because Trayvon was Black, he posed a serious enough threat to the community to justify Zimmerman ignoring police instructions to remain in his car.
3) Since Trayvon was Black, they should ignore the fact that Zimmerman actually approached him in the first place. And finally,
4) since Trayvon was Black, it was the height of audacity for him to think he had the right to defend himself after being confronted by a man who wasn’t a police officer, and who didn’t have any visible sign of authority.
.
If we accept that as the standard for justice in this country, that could cause murder-for-hire to overtake drug dealing as an easy source of disposable income. What’s to prevent some woman’s boyfriend from dragging her husband in an alley, blowing his brains out, and then calling the police and claiming self-defense? Or what’s to prevent a robber from killing his victim to cover his crime, and then calling the police and claiming he was attacked? Thus, the standard that Zimmerman was freed on was absolutely ridiculous – and clearly racist in nature.
.
An assault is an intentional act by one person that creates an apprehension in another of an imminent harmful or offensive contact. So just by following, and then walking up to Trayvon at night constituted was an assault, because you don’t have to put your hands on a person for it to constitute an assault. Putting you hands on them is assault and battery. An assault is merely placing them in fear for their well being. So it was Trayvon who had the right to defend himself. If the exact same scenario had taken place, but it had been a Black man who killed a White kid, the Black man would undoubtedly already be on Death Row – for first degree murder.
.
But Black people are used to such ridiculous standards being applied to them, because many Americans, when it comes to self-serving comfort of racism, have a pronounced blind spot – and it’s historic in nature. The blind arrogance of many Americans is absolutely astounding – and then they’ll say things like, “There you go playing the race card again!” Of course we are, because you’re a racist, idiot!
.
How in the hell can a White person even presume to tell a Black man about racism, and the state of racism in America? They have absolutely no idea what America looks like through the eyes of a Black man. George Zimmerman stalked an unarmed Black child, who was minding his own business, AFTER being told by the police to stay in his car, then shot and killed him. That’s murder, regardless to how you slice it – Period.
.
Now, I love this country, but I don’t suffer any illusions about what it represents. But if you relate the truth about this country to some White folks – especially conservatives – they’re so blind to reality that they’ll call you un-American, regardless to how many facts you bring to bear. The reason for that is, as Americans, we’re expected to adhere to an unspoken agreement to perpetuate the American myth.
.
But the easily demonstrable fact is, the United States is one of the most racist countries on the face of the Earth – and it always has been. All this “freedom and justice for all” was a lie when it was written, and it’s still a lie.
.
Again, Americans have a delusional blind spot when it comes to this country. We condemned Hitler for killing 6 million Jews, but we conveniently ignore the fact that Americans killed over 100 million Native Americans – and some historians place the number at closer 300 million. We call Al Qaeda unconscionable terrorists for killing three thousand Americans, then we trot right over to Iraq and kill over one million innocent women and children – and for absolutely nothing! Then we talk about the war against terrorism, but we’re the only country on Earth that has dropped not one, but two, atomic bombs on Japan – one each, on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing and maiming thousands of innocent men, women, children, cute little puppies, and cuddly little kittens.
.
Yeah, I know – we were at war with Japan. But we were at war with the Japanese government, not innocent noncombatants, and terrorism is defined as “the killing of innocent noncombatants for political purposes.” So based on that definition, the United States is the most brutal and prolific terrorist nation in the history of mankind – and I didn’t even mention the atrocities committed during slavery, the Jim Crow years, and during WWII when Black war heroes were forced to give up their seats on the train for Nazi prisoners of war.
.
So George Zimmerman supporters can talk until their mouths are dry about why he was justified in killing that innocent child, but they’re not fooling the Black community for one second. Because contrary to what they’ve obviously convinced themselves to believe, being a minority and being dumb is far from synonymous, so we know them much better than they obviously know themselves.
The idea that George Zimmerman’s following of this kid was “legal” or “not illegal” is completely beside the point. It was ill-advised, not to mention downright stupid. Who follows someone in the dark without identifying himself/herself and doesn’t expect negative repercussions of some kind? As a 26-year civilian employee myself of a police department, I would have enough common sense to listen to a dispatcher who is speaking on behalf of the department. That person was giving him common sense directions that were designed to protect both Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman. In addition, he violated the neighborhood watch rules about not carrying a gun while on duty or following. He was only supposed to observe and report. Besides, he had made 46 calls to 911, most of which were about black males who were doing nothing wrong. One of the calls was about a 7-year-old boy. I don’t know how true this is, but whoever had been committing robberies in that community is alleged to have been caught before February 26, 2012. So, the suspicion was only in George Zimmerman’s delusional thinking which was probably worsened by the prescription drugs he was taking. One of them was Adderall which promotes aggression. He should have been tested for drugs that night, and not been allowed to just go home. The Homeowners’ Association in Sanford awarded the kid’s parents an amount in excess of $1 million. I see it as a tacit admission that they should have addressed the numerous complaints about Zimmerman’s aggressive tactics as neighborhood watch captain before he ended up murdering someone for no reason.
As the grandmother of a 17-year-old boy and the great-aunt of another, this case, the trial, and the resulting travesty of a verdict struck a nerve. It’s downright sickening and disheartening to read or hear the rationalizations in defense of George Zimmerman. His defenders turn a dismissively blind eye to his brushes with the law as an adult. They include domestic abuse toward a former girlfriend and assaulting a police officer. The rationalization is that he didn’t go to jail for these things, so to them it’s as if he never did those things. Yet, they magnify the silly, adolescent things this 17-year-old did as if they provide a justification for his murder.
They readily swallow George Zimmerman’s nonsensical story about having his head bashed on the cement when the two were not on the cement and he only needed 2 bandages for scratches. On top of it, he went to work the next day and got a doctor’s excuse only because his employer requested it. What’s even more foolish is that he claimed this kid was covering his mouth at the same time, which would have been physically impossible without at least 2 pairs of hands. His defenders also turn a blind eye to the fact that he and his wife lied about the funds they got from donors, she in court and both of them in a telephone conversation while he was briefly jailed. He is a proven liar, and he has an enabling former Virginia magistrate of a father who has repeatedly been an the worst kind of parental enabler by getting him out of his scrapes. The point that these jurors acquitted him because they were inclined to empathize with him and not the dead black kid is well taken.
The prosecution screwed up royally by allowing the defense to portray this kid as a big, scary black man. As for the issue of racism, it was present from the time George Zimmerman profiled this kid and caused his senseless death with his reckless actions to the shoddy “investigation” the Sanford police conducted. Zimmerman’s father and a Florida State attorney who was the father’s buddy overrode the investigator who wanted to charge Zimmerman with manslaughter because he didn’t believe Zimmerman. It was also present in the defense’s putting the victim on trial. Furthermore, anyone who doesn’t have a problem with people following them in the dark without identifying themselves, or with police who marginalize black crime victims like the Sanford PD do, is either in denial or just plain stupid. Nothing will ever convince me that they would stand for it if a loved one died under such circumstances and his or her death was trivialized that way by police.
Last of all, many defenders say he should have shown respect to the adult. At a time when all kids, regardless of race, have to be taught for their own safety that not all adults are to be trusted, that thinking smacks of self-righteous stupidity. That’s especially true when speaking of an emotionally stunted, unstable individual like George Zimmerman who has his own problems with authority.
You are playing fast and easy with facts, essentially building a straw man argument to support the narrative you want to be the truth. You are ignoring any evidence, witness testimony or expert opinion which does not fit with your preconceived idea of what this crime was all about. I believe that what George Zimmerman did was wrong; however, it was not illegal. There is no evidence (except perhaps some unclear testimony from Jeantel) that Zimmerman ever initiated a confrontation. Was he watching Trayvon Martin? Yes, but it wasn’t until after the dispatcher began asking him questions such as “Where is he now” and “what does he look like?” That Zimmerman got out of his car and began following Martin. At this point the dispatcher asks him (obviously due to the background noise) “Are you following him?” To which Zimmerman says, “Yes.” Then the dispatcher says, “We don’t need you to do that.” Zimmerman’s response is “ok.”
Now, the dispatcher saying “we don’t need you to do that.” Is not a lawful order, in other words, George Zimmerman had the right to do at this point whatever he wanted to do. Now what evidence do you have that he continued to follow Trayvon?
He did say that he continued toward his street so that he could give the police a specific address to meet at. Is this explanation not good enough to satisfy you, or does it not fit your narrative so it must be a lie?
On the issue of racism, I will agree that all of us, regardless of skin color profile people. We do it every day, that’s generally the first thing we do when we meet someone new. Is it wrong? Probably. Ask an Arabic man how life has been since 9/11. Do white people get profiled? Are you going to tell me that you didn’t know that the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooter was white before they showed his face on television? Are black people racially discriminated against disproportionately? I’m afraid that is true. That does not mean, however, that all interactions between blacks/whites/Hispanics are racially motivated. I understand that your perception is reality, but just because you want to make this issue about race and I don’t does not make me a racist.
I am simply looking at all of the available evidence, ignoring the media’s twisting of facts and I came to a conclusion based on that. It is not the same one you came to and that’s fine, but as you are supporting your argument, it would make you seem more credible if you stated facts rather than caricatures and conjecture.
Mad Stan,
We’re talking over a 150 year times span. Do the research yourself. 80 to 90% of the native population perished during the taking of American.
100 million native americans to 300 million? The world population in those centuries was between 600-700 million. LOL.
WhiteGorilla,
I completely agree. I’ve been accused of race baiting for simply broaching the subject. Far too many people take the position that the approach to addressing the issue is to simply pretend that it doesn’t exist. But that’s like insisting that cancer is just a sore. Taking that approach may bring you temporary comfort, but it won’t prevent the cancer from killing you in the end:
.
Racists Convicted Trayvon of Not Being Able To Prove Why He Deserved to Live
.
Zimmerman Supporters are suggesting that no one point out evidence of racism – whether that racism was intentional or not – while at the same time, accepting the fact that it goes without saying that because Trayvon was a young Black male that Zimmerman was justified in his assumption that he constituted a threat to the community. What is that if it isn’t racism?
.
Clear Evidence of a racist mind-set is the fact that most Zimmerman supporters are accepting the murderer’s version of events – a murderer, I might add, who has been caught in several inconsistencies. Why would they do that? If a guy is arrested for shooting someone in an alley, would they blindly accept the murderer’s word that the victim attacked him? If so, what’s to prevent every murderer from claiming that he was being attacked. So if every murderer was treated with the same deference that George Zimmerman was treated, the only way to convict anyone of murder would be with an independent eye witness.
.
We have no evidence to suggest that Trayvon did any of the things that Zimmerman claimed. Yet, Zimmerman supporters are claiming that we have to prove Zimmerman guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Well, it had been proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Zimmerman initiated a chain of events that ended in the death of an innocent kid. So it is up to Zimmerman to prove that there were mitigating circumstances that made the murder of an unarmed child justified. But instead, they convicted Trayvon – who was simply coming home from the store – of not being able to prove he had a right to live. How is that not racism?
.
http://www.thestate.com/2013/07/10/2856356/sc-supreme-court-stops-murder.html
Mispelling alert. We NEED an open forum…
Eric, This is a great article. I work as a P.I. and Bond agent in Sanford(Seminole Co.), Fl. I primarily do investigations for a local defense attorney. Needless to say most of my clientele is black. I am not a racist. I’m from a very multi-cultural family. Black great grandma, Jewish step-dad, Indian/Canadian wife, Hindu father-in-law, Roman Catholic Mother-in-law, Jewish grand parents, Icelandic grandma. How we perceive our cultures is the great divide. Education is the next great divide.
Not enough of the country knows Florida law. The Florida self defense laws probably have the most latitude in the country. It has served in Sanford at least two black men very well. One, a convicted felon who should not have owned a gun, shot a man coming in through a window of his home. In the second, a black homeowner approached two men on his property. He was armed so were they. The black homeowner was shot. The shooters Sanford P.D. The homeowner lived and he received a very nice settlement from the city, because the officers didn’t ID themselves.
The main thing is we as a nation need to confront racism head on in all of society. It never really bothered me, but hearing my late father-in-law bash the Jews because of his unfair treatment in the medical world showed he was an ignorant man despite his education. He was a dark skinned East Indian man with a thick accent that many people mock or use for comedy. For some reason most people have this misconception that Jews run the money in the world. Trust me, growing up in a poor Jewish household that isn’t the case. My step-dad worked hard. He owns his own business, exports to over 80 countries, and is now loaded.
Overcoming racism and stereotyping is crucial for the advancement of our nation. I am glad I stumbled on to this website. We meed an open forum on how whites, blacks, hispanics, and others view each other behind closed doors.
What can the world think of the United States of America know, after its justice fails to protect and that allows a murderer of a child go free. What ever your predisposition is. You must accept that the culture of Racist attitudes and Laws, emboldened an admitted weakling to profile, hunt, confront and murder a lone innocent CHILD.
Jomora,
One’s predisposition colors the way that one perceives the world. Therefore, in my opinion, the only way that it would be possible to view George Zimmerman’s actions in a less than culpable manner is to view reality through the clouded lens of, at the very least, a predisposition towards latent and unrecognized racism.
.
Many who support the verdict, yet recognize it as the brutal assault on American justice that it is, are trying to hide behind the law by saying that they had no choice but to let Zimmerman off due to the reading of Florida law. But that’s not only a weak argument, but a transparent attempt to justify their innate predisposition not to hold Zimmerman accountable for his actions.
.
This verdict boiled down to whether or not the jury believed Zimmerman’s story, in spite of all its flaws. It wasn’t the law that determined whether or not the jury accepted Zimmerman’s story that Trayvon attacked him, or that he feared for his life against a child who weighed 40 pounds less than himself, or that once he had the gun out he had to pull the trigger. It was their predisposition to WANT to believe him.
.
The bottom line is, this verdict essentially, and in fact, convicted an innocent victim instead of a murderer who took a series of extraordinary and improper actions that led to the victim’s death. Thus, in order to excuse the murderer’s improper actions, and convict the victim instead of the murder, it required a mind-set that betrays a racist predisposition – whether the assessor of fact was trying to act in good faith or not.
.
That’s my position, and I stand by it.
I find it shameful for you to post the following list of reasons below and here’s why.
1) simply because Trayvon was Black was an acceptable reason for Zimmerman to suspect him of criminal activity.
(Who are you to say what he was thinking you don’t know him you’re a columnist at)
2) Again, because Trayvon was Black, he posed a serious enough threat to the community to justify Zimmerman ignoring police instructions to remain in his car.
(I hope in my neighborhood, if someone looks suspicious that my neighborhood watch reports it at its brave enough to sit there and find out where they’re going and maybe notify the people)
3) Since Trayvon was Black, they should ignore the fact that Zimmerman actually approached him in the first place. And finally,
(it is not illegal to follow someone. He was trying to find out who this person was and where they were going because they look suspicious. Remember this is not, you might call a safe neighborhood or are you forgetting that.)
4) since Trayvon was Black, it was the height of audacity for him to think he had the right to defend himself after being confronted by a man who wasn’t a police officer, and who didn’t have any visible sign of authority.
(Once again putting words into a person’s mouth. Who knows he might’ve been a undercover cop and he also had the option to call 911 saying he was being followed)
(Fact) Trayvon’s family has sealed his school records because they would be damaging to the case. But they do find out through other investigations, how he swung at a school bus driver. But in and the media and in the African-American community they are turning a blind eye to those facts.
(Fact) We do find out In his autopsy he had drugs in his system we also find out that his own friends said it and dealt and did drugs.
Why are people like you trying to stir up so much controversy and hatred between both African-Americans and white people.
It’s time that this country stops being politically correct and the American people speak out about this for all races. it is also time for people like Jesse Jackson Al Sharpton and columnist like you to stop treating every white and black crime as a racist crime against African-Americans and living off the carnage that happens afterwards. Nobody’s talking about how the now there are e-mails going out how African-Americans are going to kill white people, but nobody’s talking about that in the media.
Mr. Wattree, I will save my breath because you already seem to have all the answers and don’t want to hear any rebuttals so I will not waste my time.
ANOTHER great article bro ERIC. NOW that the government has us divided into our racial tribes over this travesty of justice now phase two can be implemented ;its called the HEGELIAN philosophy for those who have a deeper understanding.
IT simply comes down to problem;reaction and solution. THE PROBLEM a vigilante stalk a young black man track him down and shoot him with no legal authority to do so claiming self defense in the process.
THE REACTION the outrage by blacks and others with protest and the media appointed pimp leaders appear all to be amplified to the highest pitch crying for the solution.
THE SOLUTION what could be a solution to a problem were a self appointed citizen watch person tracks down a unarmed person and shoot him and claim self defense.
ITS very simple when you understand how this works you change the definition of what is self defense and what is a personal threat.
OUR government is trying to disarm us and deny us the right of self defense. THE government wish is to weaken the states self defense laws and definitions in FLORIDA its called STAND YOUR GROUND in my state of TEXAS its the CASTLE DOCTORINE.
ALTHOUGH many of these laws have been abused especially in the southern state that I now reside in we still do not want this federal government to determine when we feel our lives our threatened and when we can defend ourselves. OVER the next days and weeks we will see more legislation introduced changing laws and rules as to when we can and cannot defend ourselves. IT would not surprise me if we hear of a law named the TRAYVON MARTIN law. BELIEVE it or not our government is that damn devious.