Muammar Gaddafi kill by USA…

Like Love Haha Wow Sad Angry

(ThyBlackMan.com) Whether you believe that Muammar Gaddafi was a corrupt dictator or a leader who worked to provide the highest standard of living on the African continent, the U.S.-backed NATO invasion of Libya was unjust, unlawful, and immoral. Libya is a sovereign nation and as such has the right to operate as it sees fit within its recognized geographic borders. Any violation of a nation’s sovereignty must be done legally and not to engage in militarized diplomacy in order to affect regime change.

On March 17, 2011, the United Nations (UN) adopted UN Resolution 1973. This formed the legal basis for the military intervention in Libya, authorized the international community to establish a no-fly zone and to use all means necessary (short of foreign occupation) to protect civilians. The problem with the resolution is that it directly contradicts the UN Charter’s strict limits on military (or Chapter 7) actions. These actions are only sanctioned when responding to threats to international peace and security. There was never any evidence presented that Libya was threatening international peace; this was a civil war. The sovereign Libyan government was responding to a threat by a loose confederation of tribal militias, domestic rebels, an armed military force that was backed by other nations such as France, Britain, and the US. Any sovereign government is well within its rights to defend itself against such an attack.

As mainstream American media reported on this story, it failed to provide insight and perspectives from the African Union and credible sources from the African continent. A group of over 600 concerned African leaders issued a statement warning about Africa being recolonized as NATO supported the Libyan rebels. Former African National Congress President Thabo Mbeki, Professor Shadrack Gutto of the University of South Africa, former Intelligence Minister Ronnie Kasrils, head of the Politics and Foreign Policy Department at the University of Johannesburg Professor Chris Landsberg, and hundreds of others condemned the “misuse of the United Nations Security Council to engage in militarized diplomacy to effect regime change in Libya” and the “marginalization of the African Union.”

The UN action was rationalized as a humanitarian mission. President Obama defended U.S. intervention and NATO involvement by stating, “In this particular country – Libya; at this particular moment, we were faced with the prospect of violence on a horrific scale.

Finish story over at; UrbanCusp – Muammar Gaddafi Death, etc.

Also follow UrbanCusp on Twitter; http://twitter.com/UrbanCusp/.

and Facebook; http://www.facebook.com/urbancusp.

0 Shares

Flip

Leslie says:
October 31, 2012 at 7:20 am
This is a clear drive that is reinforcing the now widespread conspiracy theories promulgated by the rather precieved insane authors.It is becoming apparent that indeed this world is functioning under gonvernance by ideologists with esoteric interests who operate under the guise of international humanitarian organs.How can you explain the invasion of a democratic,so to speak, country and assassination of the Head of State.What threat was being posed to the international community,why invest in their arms for the purpose of restoring order to a country that was under a 42 year dictatorship.I mean,why wait 42 years ???In 1986 in the then fallout between the West and Gaddafi similar incidences were witnessed where these invasions started resulting in the loss of innocent lives.Now again,we witness such catastrophic events and the vox populi remains silent obly to blubbur behind closed doors.If you look by African or even 1st world standards,Gaddafi did more good than bad for Lybia.He nationalised the oil reserves and was the only leader with a debt free state.The interests of annexing these oil reserves is the sole motivation of these western puppets.The network has developed a tap root into our daily lives and it is now a matter of time before we witness events which are extreme and more aggressive than before because the end or manifestation of these cults goals are at hand
james says:
November 3, 2011 at 5:04 pm
How is it that Obama who is of African origin receives no criticism for bombing Africa in support of racist libyan al-qaeda rebels. Surely, lynching a black man in 1920s America is no different to the lynching an African in Tawergha last week. Obama, supported this and Clinton was ecstatic. Camoron and Sarkozy are racists what’s Obama’s excuse? I really do not understand him and the so called African American leadership.
propaganda says:
November 3, 2011 at 6:03 am
the united nations is contradicting itself. how can you set policies that violates your constitution? this is just a conspiracy theory about gaddafi and hi emperor. the american dictators do not have a right to interfer in other countries in the world. how many muslim leaders are you going to murder? this is not humanity, it is politics!