(ThyBlackMan.com) During the Reagan era, prominent figures of the Religious Right movement played a significant role in mobilizing conservative Christians and advocating for their political interests. While the movement was largely led by figures such as Jerry Falwell (Moral Majority) and Pat Robertson (Christian Coalition), younger individuals such as Ralph Reed and Paul Weyrich also played a key role in the movement’s organizational and political outreach.
The younger leaders often focused on mobilizing support on the grassroot level, developing strategies for political engagement, and leveraging new media technologies to spread their message. Ralph Reed, as executive director of the Christian Coalition, was a major influence in mobilizing evangelical voters and influencing political discourse during the 1990’s; thereby extending the reach of the Religious Right’s agenda. Paul Weyrich, as a key strategist, was co-founder of the Committee for the Survival of a Free Congress (now the Free Congress Foundation). He was instrumental in building the conservative infrastructure that supported Ronald Reagan. With the White evangelical voters becoming mobilized and focused while working within a conservative infrastructure, their numbers and political influence grew over the years to become a formidable force and voting bloc. We see the outcome with as demonstrated by today’s Trump’s MAGA movement.
Those of us who oppose the MAGA movement and their anti-DEI agenda can learn a lot from the tactics used by Falwell, Reed and Weyrich. Particularly on how they made abortion a rallying cry for the Religious Right. Abortion became the most potent unifying issue in modern American politics. It became a defining issue as part of a long-term political and cultural strategy. Through mass mailings, religious broadcasting, and organizing conservative Christians, the Moral Majority and similar organizations reframed abortion not only as a moral but also a political issue that defines their movement. The Religious Right was strategic. Conservative evangelicals, Catholics and other groups built a broad coalition not primarily on theological terms, but on the language of “human rights” for the unborn. Opposition to Roe v. Wade became both a symbol and an overwhelming priority of the movement’s vision.
The Religious Right transformed abortion into a litmus test for candidates and judges, shaping the Republican Party’s platform and the agenda of conservative movements for decades. Theologically and politically aligned churches became centers for grassroots organization, encouraging voter registration, political activism, and public protest. The Moral Majority mobilized millions of voters and influenced candidate selection and party platforms. The persistence paid off. After nearly five decades of sustained activism, the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women Health Organization overturned Roe v. Wade. This was the crowning achievement of a long campaign by the Religious Right.
The network of progressive churches should follow the Moral Majority blueprint. Where conservative Christians used abortion as their rallying cry, progressive Christians who believe in justice and fairness should use overturning anti-DEI measures as their unifying and defining issue to galvanize and mobilize voters. U.S. Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., means business by giving progressive Christians the legislation they need as a rally point. She introduced a bill in the U.S. House of Representatives that would restore what major advocates say are major setbacks to closing social and economic gaps for Black and other marginalized communities. “Their rollbacks have been swift and deep over the last six months, and all marginalized people are feeling the impacts,” Rep. Pressley told The Grio. She described the Trump administration’s anti-DEI agenda as “anti-Blackness on steroids.” Pressley’s “Equity in Government Act” would restore policies which former President Joe Biden established by executive order to expand equity efforts across the federal government.
Executive Orders 13985 and 14091 mandated that federal agencies embed equity in their everyday business, including tailoring services to ensure that they reach and improve the lives of Black and Brown, women, LGBTQ and disabled communities. The Biden administration’s DEI framework invested programs and grants designed to expand access to housing, education, entrepreneurship, health care, voting and reduced exposure to environmental harms and community violence.
Biden described his equity orders as a “whole-of-government response” to the systemic harms caused by policy discrimination and basis. “There were gains being made,” Pressley said during a press conference promoting the Equity in Government Act. She also stressed the fact that “gains and not guarantees”. Despite Biden’s federal action to address systemic racism and bias, Trump on his first day in office rescinded Biden’s equity orders and banned all DEI-related programs and policies. The Trump administration is also pressuring private industries, including universities and Fortune 500 companies, to follow suit.
Rep. Pressley is fighting back and she is giving others the ammunition to join the fight. “People need organizing prompts, and this legislation also provides that because that’s necessary for the movement to remain fortified, emboldened, to keep momentum up,” Pressley said. In other words, the “Equity in Government Act” can be used as the progressive’s rallying cry for a long-term fight. While we don’t have five decades to get this right, the bill can be a starting point leading into the mid-term elections.
Written by David W. Marshall
Official website; https://davidwmarshallauthor.com/
Mr. Marshall, I greatly appreciated your enlightening and thought-provoking article. It provided a history of how the American Right achieved its overwhelming dominance in American politics today. You also suggest how America’s progressives might want to learn from the American’s Right playbook in order to effectively counter the devastating, reactionary, hostile, un-American and un-Christian policies championed by the American Right in particular its MAGA cohort.
The attack on DEI by the current regime and MAGA is tragic and Blacks and other people of color will be negatively affected. I don’t see that as the horse to however ride to the finish line. It is not an issue which will excite Blacks and others to action. Equal employment opportunities and affirmative action may have been important for Blacks during the last 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, however not sure how important it is to Blacks in 2025. Blacks did benefit from equal employment opportunities and affirmative action however it was white women who were the greatest beneficiaries of such policies.
What I do see as an issue to saddle up and ride in the well-being and sustainability of children. Children, all children regardless of race, origin, language spoken or gender, should become to progressives what the unborn was for the American Right.
What I do envision as necessary and successful is an aggressive, proactive, militant philosophy in which the social gospel of the life and teaching of Jesus in particular in its reference to children becomes the supreme doctrine of a progressive movement. An extremely important tenet of the philosophy and movement would be the concept of revolutionary love as lived and taught by Jesus.
A movement in which a radical, highly zealous religious army of believers standing shoulder to shoulder with progressive activists and organizers representing various progressive agendas would aggressively move forward under a big inclusive umbrella. All would be welcome if their prime objective was the advancement and well-being of children. The advancement and well-being of children would be paramount and sacred.
The sex trafficking of children, pedophilia, policies and practices that harmed and hurt children would be targeted. Lawmakers would be forced to answer how will this law affect children.
This progressive movement, no less zealous in its application as elements of radical Islam, would not limit itself to achieving political power but would seek influence and control of commerce and business, social institutions and the arts.
A prime focus of the movement would be to enlist the significant and growing number of young males of all races who find themselves alienated in a world in which they do not see themselves.
Will this movement happen overnight? No, what has taken 70 years to get to the point where things are today probably may take 70 years for the pendulum to swing back the opposite way. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. However, with the new technology which has both shrunk the world at the same time, more distance, along with an aggressive cadre of activities, soldiers, creators, influencers and true believers anything is possible.
Again, I greatly appreciate your thought-provoking article.