Thursday, November 30, 2023

Radical Islamists and Radical Leftists: The eerie similarities.

September 15, 2012 by  
Filed under News, Opinion, Politics, Weekly Columns

Like Love Haha Wow Sad Angry

( The events at American Embassies in the Middle East and Africa over the past few days have once again shined the spot light on the global clash between the American ideals of freedom and the ideology of radical Islamist.

We are again at this pivotal crossroads, just as we were last year when Terry Jones a pastor in Florida burned the Koran at his church, and tested the boundaries of American free speech.

This time a video made in America, that by all accounts insults the religion of Islam and its founder, has been labeled a co-conspirator by the media in the death of the US Ambassador to Libya, three other Americans and for stirring violent protest at US Embassies across the Middle East and Africa.

As I have stated before and reiterated again; I am disturbed by the reaction that some of our leaders in government have adopted.  A seemly frail foreign policy of capitulation towards Muslim extremist, while at the same time expressing an increased disdain for our first and most treasured right; the right speak or express what some may deem unpopular or offensive speech.

 Likewise is the disturbing inept, protection of Obama at all cost, agenda  driven liberal media. Whose disgust and misdirected focus has been on finding out who made the video and Mitt Romney’s response to these tragic events. Instead of focusing on the dangerous ideology that is radical Islam; and why it is an ever-increasing threat not only to America but to the entire of world.

These events have shed light on a disturbing parallel that I believe must be examined. The eerie similarities between radical Islamist all over the world and radical Leftist that reside right here in America. Because their ultimate goals are synonymic. A nation; dare I say a world, under submission to their will.

I believe these two ideologies are clear and present dangers to America and the world at large. Because both; at their core seek to suppress any speech or expression that is contrary to their worldview. Free speech has to be the first and most protected foundational pillar of any new nation.  And it must be re-enforced perpetually in any existing nation that has adopted it.

The ideology of radical Islam has no place for dissent, compromise, freedom of expression or speech. It seeks to rule by the sheer force of fear, intimidation, criminalization and tyranny. Terrorism is its dominant mode of operations. It will not tolerate any opposing views or critiques. To say or do anything that it deems insulting of its worldview is worthy of imprisonment or even death. Its influence is so strong that it persuades the emotionally unstable to commit horrific acts terrorism. Its desire is total submission to its will.

Likewise in the same way contemporary liberalism/progressivism uses the same M.O. The ideology of the radical Left has no place for dissent or freedoms that do not comport to their worldview. It seeks to intimidate via boycotts, petitions, protests’ and lawsuits.

Dare to speak ill about or challenge any of its holy doctrines, which include:

Abortion on demand, Gay Rights/Marriage, Evolution, Unions/Collective Bargaining Rights, Open-ended Civil Rights, Global Warming, Reducing  Social Programs, just to name a few…

And the campaign of policing, isolating and ideologically terror begin with a vengeance, a type of jihad against those who oppose its failed worldview. Likewise its influence is so strong that it drives some of its most emotionally unstable to actually commit deplorable acts like that of Floyd Corkins II.

Just as this Nation and the rest of the world are faced with how to combat the threat of radical Islamist and the perverted worldview it seeks to establish. We are also faced today with the threat of radical Leftist and the equally twisted worldview they have erected in every American institution.

The question remains how will we respond to both of these clear and present dangers? What policies will we adopt?

Will it be a policy of appeasement, apologies, and capitulation they will bring a counterfeit peace and broken treaties.

Or will we take a stand and fight against these demonic ideologies. And institute policies of peace thru strength, with non- negotiable edicts that have proven results, like promoting stable families, strong national defense, and a smaller and more efficient government etc. These will guarantee a greater future for our children and our Nation.

Follow Xservativestalk on Twitter (—–

Staff Writer; Donald Thornton
Host of Xservativestalk – Talk Radio of The Future Today!
5pm Sundays CST on 100.7fm or online or visit this talented brother over at;



13 Responses to “Radical Islamists and Radical Leftists: The eerie similarities.”
  1. Yasheeda says:

    I see why the truth is always resisted….Christians at best have only 1 or 2 values (if that).
    We will convert you all one way or another..(not violently)

  2. honkeyintexas says:

    anti abortion
    anti evolution
    anti science
    pro death penalty
    anti gay
    pro gun
    alcohol forbidden
    dancing forbidden
    modest dress

    should I continue on listing the similarities between islamists and southern baptists?

  3. monkeyfan says:

    Cross-posted from a referring site (American Digest):

    The sociopolitical vanguards of the left seem to harbor a serious envy-crush thing for the islamist willingness and capacity to remorselessly smash opposition…But it never seems to dawn on them that the admiration is never genuinely mutual beyond mere utility as leverage.

    At the root it appears that the latest nomenclatura really believes that they (the anointed) will ultimately prevail against the islamists after their domestic political enemies have been defeated and the last truly independent thinkers are harried into the servitude of dependence. Utopia…Hurrah!

    Which begs the question; what is it in the core pathos of the collectivist left constituent that causes them to reflexively support movements whose first act upon seizing power has [historically] been to promptly line its ideological foot-soldiers against various sundry walls at the first opportunity?

    I can’t even begin to imagine the all-encompassing animus that that level of cognitive dissonance must engender, but what I can see bubbling up through the widening cracks in what had been the thin veneer of their composure is just horrible and stunning to behold.

    I mean is the self-delusion of the asses a manifestation of spiritual poverty or the mere rot of boredom that compels the combustible collective them to spray gasoline on everything while watching the world burn in the firestorms of hope and change for hope and changes sake?
    …Or is it some other non-specific nihilistic flaw that causes them to periodically drag everything that works into the ash-heap of their latest great idea?

  4. Mike C says:

    To these two, I might add a third group: neo-Nazis. Think about it:

    1) Nazi propagandists spent a lot of time in the middle east during the run-up to World War II, looking for the roots of the “Aryan” race.
    2) The Nazi high command maintained a very cordial relationship with the grand mufti of Jerusalem prior to and during the war.
    3) Josef Goebbels recruited Muslim troops from occupied Yugoslavia to fight for the Axis.
    4) Many Nazi war-crimes fugitives fled to the middle east.

    If Nazi goons were looking to hide their stolen and smuggled loot, and then use it to brew up trouble, the middle east would be a good place to do just that. And, by aligning with the far Left and radical Islamists, they would be able to pursue revenge against the Western capitalist democracies who defeated them, whilst fanning the flames of antisemitism.

    David Horowitz referred to the alignment of the far Left with radical Islamism as the “Unholy Alliance”. Might the term “Fourth Reich” be more appropriate? I think it’s worth looking into.

  5. Victor Erimita says:

    I agree there are many similarities between the groups. But in both cases, purported ideology is merely window dressing for the thuggery, anger and constitutional hatred that is the essential quality in these people. If there were only two of either group left in the world, they would be killing each other. The violence and acting out are the point. The political or religious claims are just a way for them to try to elevate their barbarity by appearing to stand for some principles.

  6. Diggs says:

    Fuck islam, fuck muslims, and especially fuck Muhammed (Please Beat Upon Him). The ragheads want a war with modernity, then let’s dance. AK-47s vs. AH-64s…I’m happy to be on the side with Hellfire missiles and Predator drones.

  7. Jay says:

    Unions/Collective Bargaining Rights and Global warming fall into demonic ideologies?

    I believe people that make such claims and those that fall in line with the tea party may need to read the Book of Revelations and study the term false prophets.

    Also, you cannot change someone or a whole society for that matter that adheres to dogma. Only the Lord Jesus Christ has that power.

  8. born in the USA says:

    Well, I guess Obama has changed the way the middle east views America. Not only have they burned the U.S. Embassy and replaced the U.S. Flag with an Islamic Flag in Egypt, attacked the U.S. Embassy in Libya killing the U.S. Ambassador and his staff and Obama responds by apologizing for American policy of free speech. Thank goodness Romney stood up for America and forced Obama to retract his apology.

  9. lewis orr says:

    If Romney is elected president it would be the end for the US. All of the enemies of the US would be duty bound to test Romney and draw the US into another war, with battle worn troops forcing a new draft further polarizing the country in time of war.

    The Foreign Relations Fumbler
    If Mitt Romney keeps misfiring on foreign policy, he’s going to blow up his presidential credentials

  10. Nicholas says:

    To the people in the Islamic world, the American concept of free speach is not easily understood. In their world, censorship is the rule and producing a movie denigrating a religious symbol had to be approved by the government. So it was a easy sell to convince the people demonstrate, but it was no coincidence that they brought grenades and automatic weapons, to a demonstration for a well coordinated attack on an American Embassy on September the 11th. Somebody got some benifits from the attack, the question is who?


Check out what others are saying about this post...
  1. […] WHAT DO RADICAL ISLAMISTS AND PROGRESSIVES HAVE IN COMMON?  Answer:  Hatred of America, capitalism, and the US Constitution.  Donald Thornton, writing in, makes the connection so many seem to have missed, parti…: […]

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!