(ThyBlackMan.com) If you think the democrat’s sudden fascination with black socialists has anything to do with their political acumen, you’re wrong. The truth is the Left’s recent love affair for national candidates like Andrew Gillum, Stacey Abrams, Ayanna Pressley and Aramis Ayala, who became the State Attorney for Orange and Osceola County, Florida in 2017, has less to do with their political talent, and more to do with their skin color, sex and oratory skills.
Truth be told, black men, and particularly black women, rank higher than most on the intersectionality chart of victimhood established by the left. With an adequate amount of funding, these candidates pose a serious threat to weak kneed republicans, who refuse to forcefully oppose their radical views for fear of being branded a racist, sexist, homophobe or worse, despite evidence to the contrary. The left uses political correctness as a weapon against republicans as a way of getting them to defend themselves against fabricated character attacks, rather than going on the offense against democratic policies. Unfortunately, the GOP has yet to convey a uniformed message that permits voters to ignore the claims of hate coming from the left, and, embrace a message of freedom and prosperity championed by those of us on the right.
To put it plainly, the left exploits black candidates in order to advance their white European style of socialism virtually unopposed.
But we’ve seen this before! This is nothing new! Similarly, Margaret Sanger, believed that the most successful educational appeal to the negro was through a “religious appeal.” As a result, the racist eugenicist, creator of the Negro Project and Founder of Planned Parenthood, hired black pastors (the real sellouts of the black community) to promote her theory on “birth control.” Sanger saw abortion as a means of eliminating the black race and other minority groups she deemed “genetically inferior” to whites. She went so far as to propose funding farmlands and homesteads to segregate blacks where they could be taught to work under “competent instructors” for their entire lives. Can you say slavery?! Additionally, she wanted black women sterilized to stop them from breeding so-called “undesirables,” because she believed their progeny (offspring) were tainted.
Today, left-wing radicals such as Michael Bloomberg, Tom Steyer, and George Soros, have rediscovered an ally amongst black socialists. They’ve joined forces to advance their own selfish agenda to expand the role of the federal government, keep more Americans impoverished and increase dependence upon government welfare programs. If they can both maintain and grow a permanent socioeconomic underclass that relies on the democratic party for their survival, democrats will win elections for the foreseeable future. Of course, for the rich left-wing megadonors that fund these candidates, there’s the added benefit of squashing upstart businesses under the weight of new taxes that could potentially compete with their companies.
Sadly, no one knows how to use blacks better than the Democratic Party. Parading black socialists in front of national cameras appeals to some of the black community’s worst instincts, such as revenge, entitlement and victimhood. Conveniently, many of their candidates moved to the front of the line are females. This makes them twice as difficult to beat. Therefore, republicans need qualified candidates that can skillfully draw them into policy debates and avoid the traps of identity politics.
To be clear, we’re not witnessing a trend or fad of black socialists rising to the top of the democratic food chain by accident. Using black socialists is a strategic ploy by the left to avoid debating the merits of their policies altogether. Those of us on the right can’t allow the democratic party to get away with using blacks any longer!
The right must fight for the spiritual, familial and financial health of the black community by reversing left-wing policies that have contributed to the destruction of the black family. Furthermore, we mustn’t hesitate to communicate why our policies help all Americans regardless of skin color, sex or socioeconomic status. Likewise, we must elect candidates that have the courage to implement those policies in the face of societal pressure.
Democratic socialists aren’t an asset to the black community. They’re a detriment to it, and should be treated as such.
Written by Carl Jackson
Official website; http://carljacksonshow.com
Look I’m beginning to think the American (regardless of color) is inferior.
In Western Europe they give their citizens EVERYTHING…
Don’t fall into “they want us impoverished” bullcrap.
You Capitalist Mongers love to snip all the safety nets.
Put up an actual article of knowledge, not of 1980’s-1990’s repeated, truncated stereotypical jargon.
A.I could have wrote this article, you right worse then Trevo Crow does…(and he writes fucking terribly )
A pluralistic democracy with a capitalist economic base that tends to reward those who believe in an unequal distribution of available good and services based on merit tends to skew towards a dictatorship if not checked by socialistic type programs that benefit those who are injured by our kind of democracy and capitalism. We therefore have a U.S. Constitution that allows social programs that benefit the poor, sick, the very young, and the very old.If America didn’t have social programs to benefit these groups of people it would be nothing more than a puppet government for the rich who would dictate policies that are purely beneficial to themselves. The pendulum of wealth distribution would swing extremely to the right back into a middle class catering to the rich and a large divide between the rich, middle, and lower classes.There would be great poverty and crime.Our form of government isn’t perfect. It tends to reward the wealthy too much and ignores the poor, the aged, and the very young.There have been social experts that have practiced a critical philosophy on our form of government and have identified its weaknesses and have concluded that our government doesn’t offer an adequate distribution of available goods and services to all of its citizens. Social programs have been developed out of political recognition of this weakness.