“White” America: Marked For Extinction by Evolution.

by Staff November 1, 2018 5 Comments News Opinion Politics Weekly Columns

Like Love Haha Wow Sad Angry

(ThyBlackMan.com) All of us reap what we sow. What goes around also comes around. It’s karma. It’s the boomerang affect. Whatever you want to call it, nobody gets away with anything – not really. Not even the most powerful nation in the world. If I were a Caucasian man of British descent (England) in America, I would be terrified that the evil and treachery of my ancestors would boomerang and impact my generation. The blood of slaughtered indigenous people referred to as “American Indians” and the blood of African slaves cries out as a testimony against the colonizers or rather illegal immigrants from Europe who invaded and stole the land we now call the United States. And without any of us ever having to lift a hand, the boomerang flies on its own.

According to the U.S. National Library of Medicine: The epidemic of despair among white Americans is causing their premature death. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5607670/

How can I say these things? Because they are true, whether any American likes it or not. As the first element of proof, I offer The Census Bureau and Harvard information which has already projected that “white” people will soon become a minority in this country and their mortality rates are rising via consistent population decline. See page 7, table 3 of the 2018 Demographic Turning Points for the United States: Population Projections for 2020 to 2060 . You can download the pdf report and keep it.

Secondly, the gene that makes Caucasian people “white” often becomes recessive when interracial relationships occur with basically any other group, especially African-Americans and Hispanics. And guess what? Younger people up to age 25 are very open, as a whole, to interracial relationships. So guess who’s coming to dinner? This is a big part of why the war on Hispanics rages. Thirdly, the mortality rate of “white” America is climbing. They are not reproducing as fast as other races or ethnicities. And 2016 was the first year in our lifetime that more “white” people died than were born.

https://hbr.org/2017/06/white-americans-mortality-rates-are-rising-something-similar-happened-in-russia-from-1965-to-2005

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/20/us/white-minority-population.html

According to Politifact:

“In response to our questions, Castellanos sent us two articles from the New York Times and the Guardian about a 2015 paper by husband-and-wife Princeton economists Angus Deaton and Anne Case. Their research showed that death rates for middle-aged, white Americans had been going up, while they had been going down for every other age, race and ethnic group.”

Refer to the charts on Pages 2 and 3 of: The 2015 Projections of the Size and Composition of the U.S. Population: 2014 to 2060 Population Estimates and Projections https://census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2015/demo/p25-1143.pdf

Hey Billy and Becky: Guess Who’s Coming To Dinner and About To Own The Table?

Once “white” people of British descent become the minority, it is only a matter of time before they lose power in politics, corporate America and social status. This must be alarming to those most closely impacted. And for the racists, this will become a nightmare. They cannot kill, incarcerate or oppress the ethnic and interracial storm that is coming, no matter what they do. If I belonged to a “white supremacist” group, I would not be able to sleep at night in anticipation of what is inevitable and the fact that I could do nothing to stop it.

So much for “white supremacy”. Donald Trump and his zombie followers have single-handedly proven there is no such thing. Hitler tried the supremacy card and failed as well, even after the Holocaust of millions of innocent Jews. Look at who did all the mass killings in active shooter incidents in this country from Columbine to Sandy Hook to the Jewish Synagogue, the black church, Vegas etc. The Caucasian community is imploding on itself and self-destructing. There is no dodging the boomerang.

The “good ole boys” of the GOP who control the congress are dinosaurs and their Caucasian replacements neither have the time nor the fortitude nor the skill set to make the impact when a storm is coming. Fortunately archaeology teaches us that dinosaurs become extinct. The “good ole boys” fought their fight and gained their ground on the backs of racism, sexism, segregation, oppression and discrimination. But without those advantages in the coming years, the “good ole boy” replacements won’t gain that type of ground anymore. The clock is ticking, the hourglass is almost empty and time is almost up.

I am not saying all Caucasian people are bad. Nor am I saying they all are racists – just millions of them who voted for Donald Trump, who defend and support him and who do his bidding. And no I am neither brainwashed nor a Democrat. I look at the facts and let the chips fall where they may. But this time Plymouth Rock is sitting in a defective slingshot and you won’t find me weeping over that.

BOTH EVOLUTION AND CREATION SELECT GROUPS FOR EXTINCTION

There are many good “white” people who have helped people of color in more ways than I can name and I am a realist, not a racist. But then there are “the others” of Caucasian persuasion in America and the hourglass is almost empty. When I look at the true history of abductions/captures, slavery, oppression, discrimination, lynchings, rapes, betrayals and invasions used to create America, I cannot shed a tear for the extinction that is coming. Nor should any American ignore the real history.

As we remember unarmed African-Americans shot down in the streets by police (http://www.killedbypolice.net), placed on the auction blocks now known as the courts and disproportionately prosecuted and incarcerated in what is now the new plantation called prison, we all have to know that crimes against a people have consequences. And the boomerang is flying.

As we see the beginnings of Adolf Hitler hatred and violence towards Jews in America, Hispanic human beings locked in cages and separated from their families, Muslims discriminated against and African Americans having to answer to police for where they live because racist “white” people called 911, we need to know that the boomerang is flying.

As we see “white” America killing its own in active shooter mass murders at Sandy Hook, Columbine, Vegas and over a hundred other places, we have to know that the boomerang is flying. But the treachery and evil of the past, the present and those who brought it can neither ignore nor avoid when the boomerang lands. We who are not colonizers cannot take that trip into darkness with them because it is a point of no return.

As a people, we African-Americans did not plant the seeds so we choose to have no part of the poison harvest. Nor do we institutionally, politically, economically, legally, theologically nor sociologically deserve to walk that colonizer road into darkness. But we will stand back and watch as the inevitable boomerang flies and time is almost up!

Staff Writer; Trevo Craw

0 Shares

Flip

Anirban (aka Abner) Bhattacharya says:
November 5, 2018 at 8:33 am
Ex. Detective Craw, read this https://www.amren.com/news/2013/08/the-real-life-tontos-how-comanche-indians-butchered-babies-roasted-enemies-alive-and-would-ride-1000-miles-to-wipe-out-one-family/ & watch this video https://www.amren.com/videos/2017/02/whites-stole-land-from-the-indians/
While I don’t always agree with Samuel Jared Taylor especially as he is a White Nationalists, Samuel Jared Taylor is mostly right about the fact that American Indians or Native Americans were not ‘Noble Savages’ & that when it comes to greed, some people are just better @ greed than others. But that doesn’t disqualify people from living in a place because of wrongs 1s ancestors did.
Europeans were better @ being greedy, than the American Indians, Native Americans, Indigenous or Amerindians, but the human mind is the same. Before the Whites, Amerindians fought each other for hunting grounds, fishing waters, religious grounds, living grounds and women and sometimes slaves. When the Whites came, they wanted the same things & more which include metals. Hypothetically, if American Indians had the better weapons and military strategies, then the American Indians would have been conquering the world.
Same thing with slavery. White Europeans were able to colonize Africa, kidnap and enslave Black Africans because they had better weapons and military strategies. But again hypothetically, if the African nations had the better military strategies and weapons, then slavery would have been the opposite because again, the mind is the same.
The fact that the land was stolen from those who were there before you doesn’t mean that you’re disqualified to live there. But you must treat fairly the people who the land was stolen from. That means treat American Indians fairly as all others, no better and no worse than any other group. While I differ with President Trump to a great extent on the immigration topic such as separate families-I think the argument ‘nobody is illegal on stolen land’ is a poor argument because we should still have immigration laws.
The land on which the Sioux lived on was stolen from other Indian tribes, but usually don’t hear that Sioux or other Indian tribes did not have a right to fight for their land just because they stole land from other Indian tribes.
US has a right to enforce immigration laws and have borders, though the land was stolen from others as long as they don’t do anything cruel and bad such as separate families or deny care for those here.
Before the Whites stole the territory, Native Americans got their lands by wars, which in some cases, involved killing the neighboring tribes men and kidnapping the women and girls as wives. In these cases, the defeated tribe didn’t get a reservation or even a bad peace treaty. The men are killed, most boys are killed (unless taken as slaves) and the women and girls are kidnapped as wives.
Now Indian reservations where Whites take the best lands and treaties broken, is arrogant, esp. when 1 wants gold, silver, etc. But here, you are alive and you or descendants have a chance. An American Indian can get married, raise family and they or descendants have a chance to change things for better because you’re alive. Indian reservations was often arrogance, but a case can be made that it’s the lesser of the 2 bads because here you are @least alive and have a chance.
An Indian war, where 1 Indian tribe kills another tribe, takes women and girls as wives, the men being killed unless the boy becomes a slave is worse because here the defeated tribe doesn’t get a treaty & thus as the men killed don’t get to marry and raise a family, you have no chance.Treatment of American Indians was arrogant only that potentially, some American Indian tribes would’ve hypothetically have done the same thing if they had the better weapons and military strategies.
Sadly, people are potentially greedy and some people are just better @ being greedy than others. But is it because wars were used to steal American Indian land or is the true meaning of this-the Whites were just better @ stealing the land? Potentially, if the Native Americans or American Indians had the better weapons and military strategies, then it would have been the other way round. Same thing with slavery-instead of Whites enslaving Blacks it would have been the opposite, because it’s just the way people sadly are potentially.
Another thing ex Detective Craw, in this article, you wrote about Holocaust with your comment ‘even after the Holocaust of millions of innocent Jews’ but that comment overlooks who were the victims before they were killed? Not all 6 million Jewish Holocaust victims were innocent. Yes, kids such as the girl Anne Frank & the boy with his hands up are innocent victims. The adult Holocaust victims may or may not have been innocent. Yes, you have adult Holocaust victims who were schoolteachers & citizens just trying to get through the next day.
But not all Holocaust victims are that. Some of the people who were killed in the concentration camps and ghettoes were Communists, pedophiles, etc. and sometimes Mobsters (in this case Nazis) kill bad people. Murderers sometimes kill bad people. Nazis sometimes murdered bad people. Some of the people who were killed in the concentration camps and ghettoes were Communists, pedophiles, etc. and sometimes Mobsters (in this case Nazis) kill bad people.
We have heard that 6 million innocents were killed in concentration camps, ghettoes and shot and killed by the Nazis. Given that some of them were horrible people such as Stalin’s henchmen and henchwomen, then all 6 million are not innocents and quite a few of the victims are horrible people. If a Jewish person was a Communist, then if a Jewish Commies ended up being killed by the Nazi mobster Einsatzgruppen, then that means fewer Julius and Ethel Rosenberg (who gave atom bomb secrets to the former USSR) and fewer Commie dictators like Kim Il Sung.
This could anger people, but it was mainly Jewish Communists who did Holodomor in former USSR and a bigger genocide which happened against Latvians, Ukrainians and others in former USSR committed by Jewish Commies and millions of them were starved to death in GULag. Soviet Commies who killed Ukrainians, Latvians, Estonians, etc. were Jewish Communists, such as Lazar M. Kaganovich, Genrikh Grigorivich Yagoda, Lavrenti Beria etc. and they did this in the 1920s and 1930s.
I don’t think Jews, Gypsies or anybody should have been put in ghettoes and concentration camps. But not all those who were killed in the concentration camps and ghettoes were Anne Franks or the boy with his hands up in a 1943 Warsaw photo. Some of the people who were killed in the concentration camps and ghettoes were Communists, pedophiles, etc. and sometimes Mobsters (in this case Nazis) kill bad people.
Dennis Mark Prager and Aaron Marshall Breitbart of the SWC would get offended if you point out the fact that not all Holocaust victims were Anne Franks & both Dennis Mark Prager and Aaron Marshall Breitbart of the SWC would get offended if you mention the fact that individually, some of the Holocaust victims were horrible people. If you were to see a photo of an Einsatzgruppen shooting a man in a ditch and ask, who the victim was before he was killed ?, Aaron Marshall Breitbart and Dennis Mark Prager would get offended by you asking that especially, if you imply the victim was a horrible person.
Yes, it’s wrong to execute without a trial and it’s wrong to put people in concentration camps and ghettoes to be starved and worked to death, shot, etc. But in some cases the Nazis killed bad people and there are cases where the Nazis killed pedophiles in the concentration camps and ghettoes. A broken clock gives you the right time twice a day & out of millions killed by the Nazis, you could find cases where the Nazis killed horrible people.
Also, many people including educated people do not know much about the Korean War and many do not know that the Korean War did not end in a peace treaty but in a 1953 armistice which has been violated a few times by North Korea. Many do not know that during the Vietnam War, North Korea sometimes violated the 1953 armistice by doing attacks on American Soldiers and their South Korean allies south of the 38 Parallel DMZ.
And with wars-soldiers killing eachother in a fight is 1 thing. But harming POW is bad. Bataan death march during WW2, atrocities committed against POW during the Korean War and Vietnam War (Hanoi Hilton) are bad and against Geneva Protocol. Once asked a Vietnam War veteran what he thought about enemy soldiers ? He told me that if they were trying to kill him in a fight, he won’t pass judgment as it’s a war and soldiers are sent to fight for their nations whether it’s the right or wrong cause. Now however, if the enemy soldiers are going to take POW and mutilate them, then that is bad & that’s murder.
Many people would not know who Sgt. Leonard George Siffleet was-the ANZAC POW who was beheaded during WW2 by the Japanese soldiers. Japanese soldiers followed Bushido code (Samurai way) and they treated POW, including American POW, Chamorro Indians in Guam, Chinese POW , Filipino POW were beheaded and bayonetted by Japanese soldiers. That is bad.
If you want information on US military during Korean War and the Vietnam War, or other things military, the TV show the Big Picture presented by the U.S. Army which ran from the Korean War until the early 1971 gives alot of information. Big Picture also discusses topics such as nuclear powered submarines, small nuclear reactors, Ranger training, training military dogs, Berlin Airlift, Berlin Wall, Cuba Missile Crisis, etc. The USMC, US Navy Presents and USAF presents also did shows on these topics, as well as the Korean War and Vietnam War.
Finally, the military has used atomic energy since the 1950s. President Dwight David Eisenhower came up with the idea of atoms for peace. I support nuclear/atomic energy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. We must use Small Modular nuclear reactors (SMR) and we must use Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor. I also support hydroelectric dams and geothermal. American Lung Association supports nuclear/atomic energy since that gives cleaner air and benefits asthmatics. Professor Steven Arthur Pinker supports atomic/nuclear energy. There are wildlife experts who support nuclear/atomic energy.
Reply
Brother Astar says:
November 5, 2018 at 7:47 am
Never underestimate your opponent brother trevo
1) Your rhetoric is pointless if you have studied the humanistic-scientific “Fermis” paradox (among other scientific documents) or your bible you would know it would be over 50 years from now anyway.
2) Whites could easily develop the technology to “overcome” their limitations with production of next level DNA. “Trans-humanism” is not a liberal dream its becoming scientific reality.
3) Whites could develop a melanin specific drug that could harm us.
4) Whites could entirely revert back to their “barbaric farm”.
Truthfully I see all 3 happening (with limited instances of #4).
Bonus#5) If the Globalists succeed in causing a World War with Russia. (Ukraine), (Georgia), (Syria) etc. European Immigration will commence and will eventually overtake Hispanics.
Bonus#6) The Globalist lead (Hispanic) Immigration will eventually end by false-flag/liberal nationalism and the collapse of the U.S Dollar. (The Globalists have economically us fighting Turkey, Iran, Russia, China and the E.U simultaneously.
I could honestly come up with 40 other reasons why your “optimism” instead of realism dream-world would be crushed to death but I won’t bother.
Reply
Anirban (aka Abner) Bhattacharya says:
November 4, 2018 at 5:35 pm
Other things ex Detective Craw-people must be judged and evaluated by what they do today & not by what their ancestors did. It’s unfair to bring up past wrongs as argument to disqualify. Here are eg. Nicolas Maduro Moros is a Socialist Venezuelan dictator. When a Spaniard has called him a dictator, Nicolas Maduro Moros and his supporters bring up things such as Venezuela once being a Spanish colony. The fact that Venezuela was a Spanish colony from the 1500s to 1800s does not disqualify a Spaniard from saying that Nicolas Maduro Moros is a Venezuelan dictator.
With Africa. A White person including an English person should have the right to say that Idi Amin Dada was a Ugandan dictator and a White European should have the right to talk about the Rwandan genocide, along with other atrocities that have happened in Africa-Congo, etc. The fact that Africa was once colonized and enslaved by Europeans does not disqualify a White person from commenting on those things because that White person is not to blame for what his ancestors did to Africa so long ago. The thing that should matter is that all ethnic groups be treated and fairly. Treat Blacks fairly, treat Indigenous or American Indians fairly-just treat all ethnic groups and races fairly, because that makes things much easier.
Things to regard. During WW2, millions on both sides died. Axis nations Germany, Japan & Italy along with Nazi Germany’s satellites such as Romania, Hungary & Finland, etc. had civilian deaths during the war. Germany, Japan & Italy had many civilian deaths such as their cities being bombed, Soviet atrocities & 2 atom bombs dropped on Hiroshima & Nagasaki.
My view with the atom bombs always has and will be that atom bombs should’ve been dropped elsewhere in Japan with fewer civilian deaths, but I can’t guarantee surrender and only bad choices for President Harry S. Truman. An invasion would have had more civilians killed and wounded. If Axis Japan, Nazi Germany & Fascist Italy had the atom bombs, they would have used them against us & we may still be dealing with them today.
Here’s the thing. If a person were to say ‘100,000 innocents killed in Hiroshima & Nagasaki’, that person likely will have others reply that while the babies & small kids killed in Hiroshima & Nagasaki are innocent war victims, the adults killed in Hiroshima & Nagasaki possibly are guilty, such as it’s possible the adults took part in atrocities such as Rape of Nanking & or killing POW such as Bataan. Same thing with Nazi Germany & Fascist Italy. People will often say that the 3 year old German, Italian & Japanese kids killed during WW2 are innocent war victims, but the parents could have been Nazis & Fascists.
Incidentally, I have heard people justify or make excuses for the killing of children who are German, Japanese & Italian children arguing on how the kids could turn out to be future Nazis, Axis & Fascists. The late journalist John Sack made excuses for the pedophile Solomon Morell when Solomon Morell raped little girls & when Solomon Morell killed a mentally retarded German boy, with John Sack making excuses such as because Solomon Morell had family members killed during Shoah, that John Sack excused Solomon Morell raping little girls & murdering boys.
With Holocaust against the Jews, I have heard people say things such as ‘6 million innocent souls’ but not all 6 million victims are innocent. Yes, kids such as the girl Anne Frank & the boy with his hands up are innocent victims. The adult Holocaust victims may or may not have been innocent. Yes, you have adult Holocaust victims who were schoolteachers & citizens just trying to get through the next day.
But not all Holocaust victims are that. Some of the people who were killed in the concentration camps and ghettoes were Communists, pedophiles, etc. and sometimes Mobsters (in this case Nazis) kill bad people. Murderers sometimes kill bad people. Nazis sometimes murdered bad people. Some of the people who were killed in the concentration camps and ghettoes were Communists, pedophiles, etc. and sometimes Mobsters (in this case Nazis) kill bad people.
We have heard that 6 million innocents were killed in concentration camps, ghettoes and shot and killed by the Nazis. Given that some of them were horrible people such as Stalin’s henchmen and henchwomen, then all 6 million are not innocents and quite a few of the victims are horrible people. If a Jewish person was a Communist, then if a Jewish Commies ended up being killed by the Nazi mobster Einsatzgruppen, then that means fewer Julius and Ethel Rosenberg (who gave atom bomb secrets to the former USSR) and fewer Commie dictators like Kim Il Sung.
I don’t think Jews, Gypsies or anybody should have been put in ghettoes and concentration camps. But not all those who were killed in the concentration camps and ghettoes were Anne Franks or the boy with his hands up in a 1943 Warsaw photo. Some of the people who were killed in the concentration camps and ghettoes were Communists, pedophiles, etc. and sometimes Mobsters (in this case Nazis) kill bad people.
Dennis Mark Prager and Aaron Marshall Breitbart of the SWC would get offended if you point out the fact that not all Holocaust victims were Anne Franks & both Dennis Mark Prager and Aaron Marshall Breitbart of the SWC would get offended if you mention the fact that individually, some of the Holocaust victims were horrible people. If you were to see a photo of an Einsatzgruppen shooting a man in a ditch and ask, who the victim was before he was killed ?, Aaron Marshall Breitbart and Dennis Mark Prager would get offended by you asking that especially, if you imply the victim was a horrible person.
Yes, it’s wrong to execute without a trial and it’s wrong to put people in concentration camps and ghettoes to be starved and worked to death, shot, etc. But in some cases the Nazis killed bad people and there are cases where the Nazis killed pedophiles in the concentration camps and ghettoes. A broken clock gives you the right time twice a day & out of millions killed by the Nazis, you could find cases where the Nazis killed horrible people.
Also, many people including educated people do not know much about the Korean War and many do not know that the Korean War did not end in a peace treaty but in a 1953 armistice which has been violated a few times by North Korea. Many do not know that during the Vietnam War, North Korea sometimes violated the 1953 armistice by doing attacks on American Soldiers and their South Korean allies south of the 38 Parallel DMZ.
And with wars-soldiers killing eachother in a fight is 1 thing. But harming POW is bad. Bataan death march during WW2, atrocities committed against POW during the Korean War and Vietnam War (Hanoi Hilton) are bad and against Geneva Protocol. Once asked a Vietnam War veteran what he thought about enemy soldiers ? He told me that if they were trying to kill him in a fight, he won’t pass judgment as it’s a war and soldiers are sent to fight for their nations whether it’s the right or wrong cause. Now however, if the enemy soldiers are going to take POW and mutilate them, then that is bad & that’s murder.
Many people would not know who Sgt. Leonard George Siffleet was-the ANZAC POW who was beheaded during WW2 by the Japanese soldiers. Japanese soldiers followed Bushido code (Samurai way) and they treated POW, including American POW, Chamorro Indians in Guam, Chinese POW , Filipino POW were beheaded and bayonetted by Japanese soldiers. That is bad.
If you want information on US military during Korean War and the Vietnam War, or other things military, the TV show the Big Picture presented by the U.S. Army which ran from the Korean War until the early 1971 gives alot of information. Big Picture also discusses topics such as nuclear powered submarines, small nuclear reactors, Ranger training, training military dogs, Berlin Airlift, Berlin Wall, Cuba Missile Crisis, etc. The USMC, US Navy Presents and USAF presents also did shows on these topics, as well as the Korean War and Vietnam War.
Finally, the military has used atomic energy since the 1950s. President Dwight David Eisenhower came up with the idea of atoms for peace. I support nuclear/atomic energy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. We must use Small Modular nuclear reactors (SMR) and we must use Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor. I also support hydroelectric dams and geothermal. American Lung Association supports nuclear/atomic energy since that gives cleaner air and benefits asthmatics. Professor Steven Arthur Pinker supports atomic/nuclear energy. There are wildlife experts who support nuclear/atomic energy.
Reply
Anirban (aka Abner) Bhattacharya says:
November 4, 2018 at 4:49 pm
Another thing ex Detective Craw, in this article, you wrote about Holocaust with your comment ‘even after the Holocaust of millions of innocent Jews’ but that comment overlooks who were the victims before they were killed? Not all 6 million Jewish Holocaust victims were innocent. Yes, kids such as the girl Anne Frank & the boy with his hands up are innocent victims. The adult Holocaust victims may or may not have been innocent. Yes, you have adult Holocaust victims who were schoolteachers & citizens just trying to get through the next day.
But not all Holocaust victims are that. Some of the people who were killed in the concentration camps and ghettoes were Communists, pedophiles, etc. and sometimes Mobsters (in this case Nazis) kill bad people. Murderers sometimes kill bad people. Nazis sometimes murdered bad people. Some of the people who were killed in the concentration camps and ghettoes were Communists, pedophiles, etc. and sometimes Mobsters (in this case Nazis) kill bad people.
We have heard that 6 million innocents were killed in concentration camps, ghettoes and shot and killed by the Nazis. Given that some of them were horrible people such as Stalin’s henchmen and henchwomen, then all 6 million are not innocents and quite a few of the victims are horrible people. If a Jewish person was a Communist, then if a Jewish Commies ended up being killed by the Nazi mobster Einsatzgruppen, then that means fewer Julius and Ethel Rosenberg (who gave atom bomb secrets to the former USSR) and fewer Commie dictators like Kim Il Sung.
This could anger people, but it was mainly Jewish Communists who did Holodomor in former USSR and a bigger genocide which happened against Latvians, Ukrainians and others in former USSR committed by Jewish Commies and millions of them were starved to death in GULag. Soviet Commies who killed Ukrainians, Latvians, Estonians, etc. were Jewish Communists, such as Lazar M. Kaganovich, Genrikh Grigorivich Yagoda, Lavrenti Beria etc. and they did this in the 1920s and 1930s.
I don’t think Jews, Gypsies or anybody should have been put in ghettoes and concentration camps. But not all those who were killed in the concentration camps and ghettoes were Anne Franks or the boy with his hands up in a 1943 Warsaw photo. Some of the people who were killed in the concentration camps and ghettoes were Communists, pedophiles, etc. and sometimes Mobsters (in this case Nazis) kill bad people.
Dennis Mark Prager and Aaron Marshall Breitbart of the SWC would get offended if you point out the fact that not all Holocaust victims were Anne Franks & both Dennis Mark Prager and Aaron Marshall Breitbart of the SWC would get offended if you mention the fact that individually, some of the Holocaust victims were horrible people. If you were to see a photo of an Einsatzgruppen shooting a man in a ditch and ask, who the victim was before he was killed ?, Aaron Marshall Breitbart and Dennis Mark Prager would get offended by you asking that especially, if you imply the victim was a horrible person.
Yes, it’s wrong to execute without a trial and it’s wrong to put people in concentration camps and ghettoes to be starved and worked to death, shot, etc. But in some cases the Nazis killed bad people and there are cases where the Nazis killed pedophiles in the concentration camps and ghettoes. A broken clock gives you the right time twice a day & out of millions killed by the Nazis, you could find cases where the Nazis killed horrible people.
Also, many people including educated people do not know much about the Korean War and many do not know that the Korean War did not end in a peace treaty but in a 1953 armistice which has been violated a few times by North Korea. Many do not know that during the Vietnam War, North Korea sometimes violated the 1953 armistice by doing attacks on American Soldiers and their South Korean allies south of the 38 Parallel DMZ.
And with wars-soldiers killing eachother in a fight is 1 thing. But harming POW is bad. Bataan death march during WW2, atrocities committed against POW during the Korean War and Vietnam War (Hanoi Hilton) are bad and against Geneva Protocol. Once asked a Vietnam War veteran what he thought about enemy soldiers ? He told me that if they were trying to kill him in a fight, he won’t pass judgment as it’s a war and soldiers are sent to fight for their nations whether it’s the right or wrong cause. Now however, if the enemy soldiers are going to take POW and mutilate them, then that is bad & that’s murder.
Many people would not know who Sgt. Leonard George Siffleet was-the ANZAC POW who was beheaded during WW2 by the Japanese soldiers. Japanese soldiers followed Bushido code (Samurai way) and they treated POW, including American POW, Chamorro Indians in Guam, Chinese POW , Filipino POW were beheaded and bayonetted by Japanese soldiers. That is bad.
If you want information on US military during Korean War and the Vietnam War, or other things military, the TV show the Big Picture presented by the U.S. Army which ran from the Korean War until the early 1971 gives alot of information. Big Picture also discusses topics such as nuclear powered submarines, small nuclear reactors, Ranger training, training military dogs, Berlin Airlift, Berlin Wall, Cuba Missile Crisis, etc. The USMC, US Navy Presents and USAF presents also did shows on these topics, as well as the Korean War and Vietnam War.
Finally, the military has used atomic energy since the 1950s. President Dwight David Eisenhower came up with the idea of atoms for peace. I support nuclear/atomic energy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. We must use Small Modular nuclear reactors (SMR) and we must use Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor. I also support hydroelectric dams and geothermal. American Lung Association supports nuclear/atomic energy since that gives cleaner air and benefits asthmatics. Professor Steven Arthur Pinker supports atomic/nuclear energy. There are wildlife experts who support nuclear/atomic energy.
Reply
Anirban (aka Abner) Bhattacharya says:
November 4, 2018 at 4:43 pm
Thoughts to what you wrote ex Detective Craw. With Whites not reproducing as fast you are right. If a person does not choose to have children, then it means nothing to complain if other ethnic groups reproduce faster. Whites have become a minority in some places. I think that Whites are justified in wondering if they will be treated fairly by non-Whites where they are a minority. Whites must still be treated fairly as other groups.
But I think that you understand that when it comes to greed, some people are just better @ greed than others. Europeans were better @ being greedy, than the American Indians, Native Americans, Indigenous or Amerinindians, but the human mind is the same. Before the Whites, Amerindians fought eachother for hunting grounds, fishing waters, religious grounds, burial grounds and women. When the Whites came, they wanted the same things & more which include metals. Hypothetically, if American Indians had the better weapons and military strategies, then the American Indians would have been conquering the world.
Same thing with slavery. White Europeans were able to enslave Black Africans because they had better weapons and military strategies. But again hypothetically, if the African nations had the better military strategies and weapons, then slavery would have been the opposite because again, the mind is the same everywhere.
The fact that the land was stolen from those who were there before you doesn’t mean that you’re disqualified to live there. But you must treat fairly the people who the land was stolen from. That means treat American Indians fairly as all others, no better and no worse than any other group. While I differ with President Trump to a great extent on the immigration topic such as separate families-I think the argument ‘nobody is illegal on stolen land’ is a poor argument because we should still have immigration laws.
The land on which the Sioux lived on was stolen from other Indian tribes, but usually don’t hear that Sioux or other Indian tribes did not have a right to fight for their land just because they stole land from other Indian tribes.
US has a right to enforce immigration laws and have borders, though the land was stolen from others as long as they don’t do anything cruel and bad such as separate families or deny care for those here.
Before the Whites stole the territory, Native Americans got their lands by wars, which in some cases, involved killing the neighboring tribes men and kidnapping the women and girls as wives. In these cases, the defeated tribe didn’t get a reservation or even a bad peace treaty. The men are killed, most boys are killed (unless taken as slaves) and the women and girls are kidnapped as wives.
Now Indian reservations where Whites take the best lands and treaties broken, is arrogant, esp. when 1 wants gold, silver, etc. But here, you are alive and you or descendants have a chance. An American Indian can get married, raise family and they or descendants have a chance to change things for better because you’re alive. Indian reservations was often arrogance, but a case can be made that it’s the lesser of the 2 bads because here you are @least alive and have a chance.
An Indian war, where 1 Indian tribe kills another tribe, takes women and girls as wives, the men being killed unless the boy becomes a slave is worse because here the defeated tribe doesn’t get a treaty & thus as the men killed don’t get to marry and raise a family, you have no chance.Treatment of American Indians was arrogant only that potentially, some American Indian tribes would’ve hypothetically have done the same thing if they had the better weapons and military strategies.
Sadly, people are potentially greedy and some people are just better @ being greedy than others. But is it because wars were used to steal American Indian land or is the true meaning of this-the Whites were just better @ stealing the land? Potentially, if the Native Americans or American Indians had the better weapons and military strategies, then it would have been the other way round. Same thing with slavery-instead of Whites enslaving Blacks it would have been the opposite, because it’s just the way people sadly are potentially.
And with wars-soldiers killing eachother in a fight is 1 thing. But harming POW is bad. Bataan death march during WW2, atrocities committed against POW during the Korean War and Vietnam War (Hanoi Hilton) are bad and against Geneva Protocol. Once asked a Vietnam War veteran what he thought about enemy soldiers ? He told me that if they were trying to kill him in a fight, he won’t pass judgment as it’s a war and soldiers are sent to fight for their nations whether it’s the right or wrong cause. Now however, if the enemy soldiers are going to take POW and mutilate them, then that is bad & that’s murder. Many people would not know who Sgt. Leonard George Siffleet was-the ANZAC POW who was beheaded during WW2 by the Japanese soldiers. Japanese soldiers followed Bushido code (Samurai way) and they treated POW, including American POW, Chamorro Indians in Guam, Chinese POW , Filipino POW were beheaded and bayonetted by Japanese soldiers. That is bad.
Reply