Hillary Clinton – If Anyone Assassinated Her Character, It Was Hillary Herself.

Like
Like Love Haha Wow Sad Angry

(ThyBlackMan.com) I was recently accused of character assassination by staunch Hillary Clinton supporters as a result of the mere mention in my article, “This Is Why I Don’t Trust Hillary Clinton – She’ll Do Anything To Win, And She Thinks We’re Dumb,” that once Hillary Clinton became desperate over her all but certain loss to Barack Obama in the 2008 primaries, she began to continually allude to the assassination of Robert Kennedy during the 1968 primary. She kept repeating that mantra as justification for why she didn’t simply get out of the race. The mere mention of this episode seemed to drive these Clinton supporters up the wall. They said it was “water under the bridge,” and others tried to make light of it as though I was some sort of crazy conspiracy theorist – “Was Hillary also responsible for the sinking of the Lusitania – and by the way, where’s her birth certificate?” But the fact is, this issue is not funny, and it should be seriously examined.

.
What made Hillary’s remarks seem much more malevolent than a simple gaffe was, as pointed out in a Keith Olbermann commentary, someone had obviously told her that her mention of the word “assassination” was inappropriate since Sen. Obama had been receiving death threats every since the day he threw his hat in the ring to run for president, so Hillary stopped using the word – temporarily. But as her situation became more dire, and it was all but certain that she was going to lose to Sen. Obama, she began using the word “assassination” again.
.
And later, On May 11th 2008, while appearing on Meet The Press, Hillary’s campaign chairman, Terry McAuliffe, made the same kind of statement to Tim Russert. He said that in order for Hillary to win the nomination “something big” would have to happen. Then Russett asked, “An act of God, or something catastrophic?”, and he said, “Yes, something big would have to happen–absolutely.”
.

So how much farther did they have to go, say, “Calling all wingnuts! If somebody – ANYBODY – don’t kill this man America could end up with a Black president!!!?”

 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLNFsl130_Y
.
So as writers and journalists, we should never tailor our opinions to appease our audience.  That’s one of the problems that we have in our political environment now, political pundits and politicians are only telling the people what they want to hear. That’s why America is so uninformed. Writers should ALWAYS seek truth and then reveal what they find, and then let the people make up their own minds regarding what they believe; if they don’t, they serve no useful purpose.  In the interest of full disclosure, admittedly, I support Bernie Sanders (although, if Hillary gets the Democratic nomination, she’ll have my full-throated support, even though I’ll be holding my nose at the time)  but if I knew of, or found out, anything negative in Bernie Sanders’ background, I’d be writing about it, because that’s what I do. That’s why at one point or another I anger everybody – Blacks, Whites, Jews, and Gentiles. The only people I haven’t offended yet are Eskimos (and someone just pointed out to me that by simply saying “Eskimo,” I’m now batting a thousand).
.
 
 

So in my judgement, when Hillary Clinton repeatedly alluded to assassination while on the verge of losing the nomination to the first Black man with a legitimate chance to become President of the United States, that was a serious issue. That was much more than just a simple gaffe, and it shouldn’t be fluffed off as such, because it speaks volumes about either Hillary’s character, her judgement, or both. Thus, any journalist worth his or her salt should feel an obligated to pursue this matter. It’s about the obligation to follow truth wherever it leads, and regardless to whose ox it gores. That’s what both journalists, and true progressives are suppose to be all about, not joining personality cults. Only wingnuts and idiots place blinders on to support their favorite candidate. That’s how we got George W. Bush – through the blind devotion of his less than thoughtful supporters – and we paid for it dearly.

.
This is neither a one-issue matter, nor a popularity contest. We’re considering the best person to become the next President of the United States of America, and that’s an awesome responsibility, and again, we can’t do that responsibly by joining cults.  The future of this nation, and the future of our children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren are depending on us to make a sober and intelligent decision on this matter, not to just vote blindly through knee-jerk emotionalism.  I addressed this issue in 2011 in an article entitled “Obama Supporters VS.  Cheerleaders.” I pointed out the following:
.
“There are two types of people who support President Obama. There are his supporters who want to see him be a success, and then there are the cheerleaders who simply go along with everything that he does and deeply resent his supporters who don’t.
.
“The president’s supporters understand the importance of remembering that in a representative democracy the president, and all politicians, are elected to serve the people, and not vice versa. They understand that all politicians are employees, and their primary job is to represent and protect the interest and principles of those who hired them. Thus, when we place the importance of any one man [or woman] above our own principles, we create a dangerous situation by corrupting the intent of our founding fathers, and turning the democratic process on its head.” (http://wattree.blogspot.com/2011/01/obama-supporters-vs-cheerleaders.html)
.
So if anyone assassinated Hillary’s character, it was Hillary herself.  I’m simply reporting it.
 
Staff Writer; Eric L. Wattree  
 
More thought provoking articles feel free to visit; The Wattree Chronicle.

 


Visit Our Fitness Blog….

BlackFitness101.com - The 411 On Fitness & Healthy Living...