(ThyBlackMan.com) If you have been following the New York City Council primary races in this campaign season (as I have), then by now you have likely balked (as I did) at the perplexing plight of 1st city council district incumbent Margaret Chin. In what should be a “no-brainer” choice for Lower Manhattan voters between a progressive icon and a virtual unknown, Chin has found herself in a pitched battle with her dark horse opponent, Jenifer Rajkumar. Rajkumar is seeking to unseat the beloved first-term councilwoman in the Democratic primary on September 10.
Who the hell is Jenifer Rajkumar?
According to her campaign website, Jenifer Rajkumar has been the Democratic District Leader for New York’s 65th Assembly District, the Legal Director of the New York State Young Democrats, a University of Pennsylvania and Stanford Law grad, and an attorney at civil rights law firm Sanford Heisler, LLP, among other things.
What does all that have to do with helping the people of Soho, Noho, Little Italy, Chinatown, the East Village, the West Village, and the Financial District, you ask?
Good question.
Several publications quote Rajkumar touting her civil rights credentials in her own words. She reportedly said, “As a civil rights lawyer I’ve had to sit across from corporate executives and fight for the little people.”
Little people? Really? Did a New York politician use the phrase “little people” post-2008 financial meltdown? If that phrase didn’t work for New York’s infamous “Queen of Mean” real estate tax cheat Leona Helmsley in the 1980’s, it certainly isn’t going to work for an ambitious Ivy League upstart city council candidate claiming to be a woman of the people three decades later. Whether or not Rajkumar intended the words “little people” to be interpreted as derisive, her choice of words, as a public figure, should give voters pause.
Margaret Chin is the obvious choice for progressives who want a better future for Lower Manhattan. Accordingly, she is endorsed by New York City’s public employee union District Council 37, the United Federation of Teachers (UFT), United Healthcare Workers East 1199, and the New York Hotel and Motel Trades Council, among others.
Her challenger, Jenifer Rajkumar, on the other hand, has less public progressive support but has cloaked herself in Benazir Bhutto-meets-JFK-esque sound bites that belie her elitist resume.
In the interest of full disclosure, I must confess that I met Ms. Rajkumar, many years ago, during my university days in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. We shared a brilliant professor of literature, a woman with a love of 16th century English poetry and Welsh corgis. I recall being impressed by Rajkumar’s intelligence in that class. She had an extensive knowledge of the work of Walter Raleigh. She had mild charm. But I do not recall being impressed by her deep liberal convictions or bold progressive political stances.
And as Shakespeare would say, there’s the rub.
I spent my time in college working and campaigning for Democratic politicians and teaching children living in the inner city how to read, among other things.
Then again, Rajkumar and I didn’t speak often. I could be wrong. Or perhaps Stanford Law School changes a person. Perhaps?
I do not know Jenifer Rajkumar. We attended a single class together, in college. But I do know that one does not develop empathy for “little people” in courtrooms or oak-panelled boardrooms; one finds it in the classrooms of New York City’s underfunded public schools, in the picket lines of underpaid teachers and transit workers, in homeless shelters among the victims of Hurricane Sandy, and in the streets.
I don’t think anyone at Sanford Heisler has gotten their hands quite so dirty as to wade into such places in their fine Italian leather shoes (except perhaps Rajkumar herself for a photo opportunity).
And thus Rajkumar’s bizarre remark about “little people” may make more sense to some. Lower Manhattan voters will have to ask themselves if Attorney Rajkumar considers herself to be among them. Lower Manhattan faces difficult challenges in the years ahead – natural disaster preparedness for individuals and small business owners, financial security for working families, police/community relationships, etc. As a Black man in New York City I would want to know that the candidate I chose to represent me in the City Council has deep ties to my neighborhood and deep sympathy for my everyday concerns.
In this election, that candidate has to be Margaret Chin.
Staff Writer; David Christopher Steele, M.A.
Official website; http://facebook.com/thesecondaryeducationcritic
I got a mailing from Rajkumar that stated that the NYU building project was a “land-grab”. NYU can’t grab the land it already owns. I would have expected better from a candidate who touts her Ivy League degrees as proof that she’s capable of leading.
You don’t live in CD1 do you? So,why the hate?
If you did live here, you would know that Chin has sold out the Little Guy countless times:
– from handing over Greenwich Village to NYU real estate interests, to selling out Chinatown and SoHo to Business Improvement Districts;
– from overturning landmark designation of an 1817 Federal townhouse owned by an overseas bank who gave Chin $5900 in campaign funds as a reward for her treachery, to selling out the historic South St Seaport to the Howard Hughes Corp;
– from reneging on her promised of affordable housing on the LES to being backed by hundreds of thousands of dollars from real-estate billionaires’ PAC;
– Etc,etc.
Why the hate for Jenifer who stood by us community activists while Chin and Quinn ordered us ejected from the Council chambers?
Why the hate when Chin made racist remarks in The Villager that Jenifer’s donors were “South Asians” (conveniently ignoring that hers were, well, North Asians). (Not to forget your racist comparison to Bhutto, who, my friend is Pakistani, not Indian. Shame on you.)
And what foolishness is it to expect one to show political persuasion in English class in college?
Wassa matter? Why the hate?
She did better in English class than you? Or likely ignore you? Getting back now for her rebuffs, you scorned “little person”.
You mention Shakespeare. Indeed, hell hath no fury than a man scorned.
whoever the person is that wrote this misinformation, can’t be from nyc because if they are they are either very detatched from what’s been happening in that 1st councilmatic district, or have a sinister reason for posting such misinformation and 2nd they leave out a key and controvesial endorsement that even councilman chin should be trying very hard to not associate herself with, the pac “Jobs 4 New York” the pac is realeastate big wigs and bankers, that latches onto to a candate wether that canidate wants it or not. They con prespective voters into thinking they are about jobs and livible wages, but in reality they are about gentrifying neighborhoods of nyc making them market rate rent only to live in.
It would be very wise to check anything before it is allowed to be posted on this blog. “Misinformation.” Is a dangerous thing.
Do you live in NYC District 1? If so, then it’s surprising that you’re such a cheerleader for Councilmember Margaret Chin, who has failed to produce on each and every promise she made when running for City Council for the 3rd time in 2009 (failing twice previously in her attempts to get elected). What has Chin achieved in her first (hopefully final) four years? Sold out Downtown Manhattan to real estate interests at NYU, in Chinatown & SoHo, at the South Street Seaport and at the Seward Park Urban Renewal Area (SPURA). She asks her constituents to “have her back” but then turns around and slides the blade in, deep and slow, as she cuts back room deals with bankers & investors.
Jenifer Rajkumar is for true representation of her many varied constituents throughout Council District 1 and will be a refreshing change from the flip-flopping and mendacity of the last four years.