(ThyBlackMan.com) Want to feel better about the Republican Party’s problems in minority communities? Spend some time with the Libertarians.
You won’t find a lot of black Libertarians because libertarian theory runs counter to every lesson learned by African-Americans in the real world struggle for civil rights. The long, sad decline of the Republican Party as the primary vehicle of black political expression corresponds closely to the rise of libertarian philosophy as a force in Republican politics. It is a story of unintended consequences and unwelcome alliances that offers crucial lessons for Republicans as we struggle to restore the party’s influence in minority communities.
Republicans began embracing libertarianism about a decade before the term found its modern American meaning. Barry Goldwater embraced individual liberty as a paramount political value in the early ‘60’s. Libertarians formed a separate political party in the early 70’s when a small core of anti-war conservatives broke from the Soviet hawks over Vietnam, but the two movements never fully disentangled from each other.
To this day figures like Ron Paul and Former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson, move easily between Libertarian and Republican circles because the boundaries are muddy. The libertarian movement today is still the heir of the Goldwater Republicans. It was Goldwater who launched the Republican shift toward libertarianism and it was under Goldwater that the libertarians failed Black America.
The proposed Civil Rights Act of 1964 presented the libertarian wing of the conservative movement with a wrenching choice. Libertarians loathed segregation, but breaking Jim Crow would demand a sweeping expansion of Federal power that would intervene deeply into private life. The dilemma was that African Americans repression rose not only from government, but from the culture and personal choices of their white neighbors.
The Civil Rights Acts proposed to do something that libertarian ideology insisted was impossible –expand personal freedom by expanding central government power. Goldwater made a fateful decision to break from the core of the Republican Party and oppose the 1964 Civil Rights Act. His decision alienated the black community and shone a glaring light on a fatal weakness in libertarian theory.
Libertarianism protects personal liberty from being impaired by government. It creates weak states on the assumption that without government intrusion personal freedom will blossom.
The black experience is a living reminder that government is not alone as a potential threat to personal liberty. It is possible, as in the Jim Crow South, to build a government so weak that no one’s personal liberties can be protected.The libertarianism Goldwater embraced had its eyes fixed firmly on Communism. In the fight against the tyranny of a totalitarian ideology, the right failed to recognize that tyranny can flourish under a weak state. Libertarian conservatives watched Medgar Evers’ funeral without recognizing small government oppression at work.
The high-minded pursuit of personal freedom from government made Goldwater an accidental hero for segregationists. In the most noxious irony of the 1964 election, Goldwater as the standard-bearer of personal liberty earned the endorsement of segregationist Democrat Strom Thurmond and became the first Republican to win the Deep South since Reconstruction.
Goldwater’s awkward alliance with racists launched a troubling trend. By elevating ideology over experience, the party of Lincoln was forging a strange new path. Those alliances, and the stubborn refusal to re-examine the choices that inspired them, continue to make the Republican Party a tough sell not just for African Americans, but for anyone with an ethnic or religious identity outside the white community.
A closer look at the weakness of libertarian ideology would provide ready opportunities for Republicans to right some wrongs. Our message of small government works only when it is tempered by a respect for the very real role that good government plays in guaranteeing freedom.
A more carefully crafted message of less intrusive government could appeal to a black urban working class who can’t get access to good schools because of the power of government employee unions. Personal freedom and accountability are a strong fit with the values of a deeply religious community torn by violence and social collapse.
Our message has potential to appeal to minority audiences, but it will never ring true unless it accounts for some realities that many Republicans are loathe to acknowledge. For example, many hard-working, successful African Americans got their start on the economic ladder with progressive hiring and promotion policies at the Post Office or in the military. It was a muscular, activist Federal government that gave African-Americans their first opportunities to participate in the American Dream.
Extreme anti-government rhetoric devoid of nuance or constraint creates well-justified fear in minority communities. Libertarian values have historically failed them, leaving them exposed to terrifying oppression. Republicans cannot continue to clumsily paint government as a fount of endless evil and hope to appeal to minority communities whose own family stories render that message hollow.
In appealing to minority communities, we need a message of small government that is more nuanced than libertarians will tolerate. Smaller government is a better prescription for personal liberty and economic success, but only if it remains strong enough to protect basic civil rights. A government small enough to “drown in a bathtub” turns society into a playground for petty tyrants.
Written By Chris Ladd
Official website; http://www.hiphoprepublican.com
For more thought provoking articles visit; HipHopRepublican.com.
Also connect with them via twitter; http://twitter.com/HHR
This article is bull crap. Libertarianism is not a political party. It is an ideology that many blacks already agree with. Tupac was basically a libertarian because he was always saying that the government instigates and encourages racism. Remember the lyric “Still II see no changes. They got a war on drugs so the police can bother me”? Or how about when Lupe Fiasco criticizes Obama for continuing the extension of imperial influence around the world and called him a terrorist? This is also a libertarian policy. Don’t box all libertarian policies into the political labels. That’s incredibly unfair. Are you saying Bill Maher, a will known liberatarian, fits into the Republican Party’s vision too? That’s ridiculous. I feel that libertarianism fits me because I don’t like big government playing father and spanking us into submission. This is especially true when she picks favorites. I remember being arrested for possession some time back. I’ll admit that I am white and what I saw disgusted me. Most if not all of the other guys who were in the pews on my court date were black males. We were all being convicted of misdomeanor charges for possession. I even noticed when I was in jail that there were three black girls that were arrested for the same thing. I know that just as many whites do this kind of stuff and never get caught. Why should we allow government to regulate something like drug policy when they can’t do it in a fare way for everybody? When I saw this I felt disheartened and realized racism must be live and well. What angered me most was the president’s inaction and how he feels the government should play daddy and ruin these guys lives over simple mistakes. These are the same mistakes he got away with his whole life. Now he has this stupid “smart on crime” policy that offers no change and only gives these guys and girls more expensive punishment a lone shark called a probation officer that threatens you all the time for not being able to afford things. I can’t imagine what it must be like for the blacks I saw going through it. That’s a huge reason why I looked into liberatarianism. Individual freedoms have to count for something. And that’s especially true when you witness obvious unfairness caused by limiting those freedoms.
As a Libertarain I have never had a problem with the federal government stepping in to correct problems at the state level, my problem is that they never step back out after correcting the situation.
@Rich Paul Freeman here is my response to your assertion -> The failure of modern libertarianism to prevent social oppression of specific populations.
Nobel economist Gary Becker did research around 2 or so decades ago that showed that individuals will pay a cost to be racists. It is called the taste for discrimination. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Becker
The premise of libertarianism (at least this model) is that economics is about rational behavior and opportunity cost. That people, if left without government intervention to the greatest extent possible, will make rational choices that lead to their best interest and hence society’s best interest.
The problem is this – Some people (not just white people) are willing to pay additional cost to support their prejudices. They are willing to pay $1.05 even if another business owner who is of the discriminated race may be selling the exact product for $1.00.
When those prejudices are systematic, the majority will make decisions to ‘pay’ for their discrimination, even in the face of greater cost savings or opportunities provided by the group they are discriminating against. When this occurs, you create a social and economic condition of oppression that exists under the guise of lack of government intervention and equal treatment under the law.
The simple and most obvious example of this is work place nepotism. How many people do you know that have gotten a job because of their family position, or relationships that weren’t as qualified as another individual? The ‘boss’ was willing to hire an individual with a weaker skill set set because other considerations were taking that were beyond additional net profit growth.
So libertarianism cannot overcome a social system in which people groups are marginalized by the larger society for whatever reason. Therefore it is equal only in theory and never can be in practice.
In that regard it is very much like communism. An ideology that is only “fair” on paper.
@ Tom
As far the black american community is concerned, Libetarianism is just another false promise of opportunity and equality. Its just like the same BS people once supported back in the 1930s about communism, many blacks were duped that under communism racism couldn’t exist. History has proven that to be a great lie.
IT’s funny that you wrote that libertarianism runs counter to everything that blacks have LEARNED about the civil rights.
True that.
Did you know that the bus company that Rosa Parks was riding that fateful day actually fought AGAINST the segregation laws put into place by the government?
Yeah. They wanted money. That’s how libertarianism works: everyone’s money is the same, so you probably shouldn’t piss off your customers.
Also, anyone who thinks that libertarianism and the Republican Party (no, NOT “Republicanism” — those mean completely different things, you moron) are similar really is an idiot.
Oh well, another waste of time article.
I disagree completely with the premise of this article. Libertarianism seeks a color blind society, in which the law treats everyone equally regardless of irrelevent factors like race, gender, orientation or nationality. Although nobody in a Libertarian soceity would be *forced* to do business with anyone, if he chose otherwise, the laws of economics will cause businesses who do business with anybody to do better — make more money — than those which operate in a bigoted fashon. Therefore, in the long run, greed will force business owners to operate in a color blind fashon. This may seem like too slow a remedy, but the alternative … explicitly forcing people to do business when they choose not to … is a violation of human rights. Nobody has a right to force others to deal with them.
To DaTruth: do you even known what libertarianism is? It holds that no one is allowed to initiate violence against anyone else. Does that sound a lot like the KKK to you? Duh.
Without police officers to arrest violators, how is segregation enforced?
Sorry, your arguments hinge on one giant flaw – that government wasn’t the enforcer of segregation. Jim Crow LAWS were the result of government. They were not the result of small government, they were the result of despotic government. You seek salvation from government…in government. You argue a contradiction.
I mourn what happened to African Americans in our nation’s history. But the answer to peace is not revenge. And peace does not lie in big government. Peace lies in the strong moral fabric of a society that values equality. Equality is not just upheld by law, but by the convictions of a people. If the people themselves do not believe in equality, then it doesn’t matter what the government tries to do, or how big there government becomes, liberty is already lost.
That is an outstanding article Chris, very well written and insightful.
Any black man or woman who supports Libertarianism needs to have their head examine. This is the same idealology that many sick right wingers, KKK and Neo-Nazi types cling to when they push their agendas.