(ThyBlackMan.com) It has been said that he who laughs last, laughs best.
When it comes to laughing at African Americans and ignorant Black comedy, we have to seriously ask ourselves: “Who’s laughing last? Who’s laughing best?”
I’m not certain that it’s us.
Let’s take, for example, Chris Rock’s famous quip: “There’s a difference between Black people and Niggers and I hate Niggers.”
The “Niggers” who laugh may think it’s funny, I thing that the white racists who are laughing are laughing best and last. After all, Rock’s quip is merely a re-hash of the old school racist delineation between the race they loved to hate and the few amongst that race they considered “safe.” Racists would often proclaim someone to be other than a Nigger when they liked that person.
The most common defense people offer up for the demeaning Black comedy is that we need to laugh at ourselves. That is neither new nor interesting and disrespecting me for disagreeing will only get you ignored or cursed out. How funny is that?
Tough talking assheads slammed me for criticizing Black men in drag, but while they defend demeaning comedy, the world is turning upside down. And damn, if defense of degrading comedy is now your revolution and if dogging me out is the best revolutionary tactic that you can muster, then your worthless life is the real punchline.
Since critical thinking is dead, allow me to offer background on how we got to the point where many of us feel all too comfortable laughing and how we have come to expect laughter even when there really is nothing funny.
In America, the people have become lazy. And because of our laziness and dumbing down, we expect to be entertained at every turn.
Advertising is delivered in song, but much of it is delivered in humor, even when dealing with serious products or services.
Corporate meetings have to be quick-paced, and conventions must be laced with entertainment to keep the attention of the ADD masses.
Morning radio shows are no longer simply music, news and traffic–the pressure is on to make the audience laugh.
And, even the most serious of presentations, the morning and evening news, is now delivered in most cases with humor. They must compete with entertaining shows and other entertaining newscasts, because, in this society, the fear is that people will tune out. We know the people won’t fight, so the fear is that they will switch.
Politicians can no longer focus on messages and promises, however empty. They must focus on being entertaining, good looking and engaging. Neither Lincoln, nor Washington could be successful politicians today, unless, of course they learned to juggle. Witness the complaints lodged against Al Gore–that he was stiff and boring. Or how about the attacks on John Edwards for his excited utterance that surely occurs with regularity deep in suburban white America?
Our schools have to take special care to keep the lesson plans moving swiftly, competing with the pace set by television and computer games, even if the message is a bit cloudy or missed by the majority.
Where previous generations of children were given age appropriate entertainment for children, today’s youth are bored stiff with entertainment designed for them. They are given access to entertainment that is violent and sexual beyond their years, while the purveyors of entertainment argue that times have changed and children have evolved. There is no real evolution, only overexposure.
In previous times, the average citizen placed primary needs above entertainment–the need for assistance, freedom, education and enlightenment and the need for a cure for the most threatening disease. Now, we fear being bored more than we fear death or destruction of our way of life. And while some factions push for the eradication of our most threatening disease, too many of our mushy-minded citizens would rather point accusing fingers at the victims of AIDS or create ghostly villains who mysteriously promulgate the disease.
Not too long ago, the standard forms of entertainment grew old and could only hold attention for a short time. Everyone is looking for the next level of entertainment–the next thrill.
Amusement parks build faster, scarier and more dangerous rides, while the people line up for them, ignoring the crash test dummies that fell apart or got necks snapped during testing. Reality television shows promise to present real people in real activities, from eating bugs and pig intestines, to risking life or at least limb, in risky stunts, but that has nothing to do with real life.
We talk about keeping it “real,” but very little is actually real. Very little exists because it exists. Much of what we do, think, wear and say is developed for corporate benefit, even as we imagine that we have individual thought and freedom of expression. Even most of the people’s politics and religious views are shaped by mega-corporations, while the people defend beliefs they don’t really understand with tooth and nail.
Written By Darryl James
Official website; http://www.darryljames.com/
Your article was referenced as a link in my blog….
http://beautybrainsandthebottomline.wordpress.com/
Hello !
I don’t know how I found you, I guess looking for something to quiet the anger I feel right now.
I live in Canada , and reading Hufff post has turned from joy to anger in the last few years. I feel a bit helpless, but I’m going to put this piece on my refrigerator door. It’s funny how something this small, a single article has made me feel better about the world. thanks and I hope you have success in whatever you do Samuel Wilson. Yours truly, Holly Henry
Mr. James,
I came across your website by clicking on the title of this article. I thought it might include a thoughtful discussion on Black comedians and the use of the “N” word, debate about what’s funny vs. what’s not funny, and even the thought of what’s “O.K.” to say (censorship) etc. Instead, I found the thesis “WE have become lazy and now we want entertainment, so anything is funny to US.”
Let me begin an examination of your essay by taking a critical examination of the following points you brought up. Your claim that “In America, the people have become lazy. And because of our laziness and dumbing down, we expect to be entertained at every turn.” First of all, which people have become lazy? Black, White, Employed, Unemployed? Please tell me. The dumbing down also deserves further review. Who is dumbing down, what?
You said “Advertising is delivered in song, but much of it is delivered in humor, even when dealing with serious products or services”. I’m not sure how familiar you are with certain techniques which help people remember things or how familiar you are with learning techniques. Jingles, slogans and humor have been used by advertisers for decades (e.g. the Oscar Mayer wiener jingle from 1965). These techniques help the consumer remember these products and can be helpful to the company AND consumer when purchases are made.
Additionally, you write “Corporate meetings have to be quick-paced, and conventions must be laced with entertainment to keep the attention of the ADD masses.” Let’s examine this further, look at the expression “Time is money.” My business can’t make money if my people are stuck in long meetings without purpose or direction. This is why we have agendas. Time is a factor in business. As for conventions, not withstanding the profits made by like-minded business vendors, entertainment (in most cases) is not employer mandated. ADD has nothing to do with the timing or scheduling of meetings or conventions.
Next, The statement “Morning radio shows are no longer simply music, news and traffic–the pressure is on to make the audience laugh.” is quite interesting. When exactly was it any different? I remember stations in L.A. like the original 1580 KDAY having humor and comedy in the late seventies and early eighties (yes, I graduated from Dorsey High in 1983. To which era are you referring? 1960?, 1950? If people chose to be entertained, especially while in the car (traffic and bad drivers)so be it. That’s what radios are for. My only point here is with the advent of satellite radio, there are numerous choices for listeners to select. Choose that which makes you happy. What’s good for you…
Now, your next paragraph states “And, even the most serious of presentations, the morning and evening news, is now delivered in most cases with humor. They must compete with entertaining shows and other entertaining newscasts, because, in this society, the fear is that people will tune out. We know the people won’t fight, so the fear is that they will switch.” When the news starts off with topics such as “Young child found dead in… Or “The unemployment rate inches upward.” The injection of humor or lightheartedness on other topics is fine. I really don’t hear or see much news delivered with comedy such as “Man mauls pet poodle after it takes a dump on his lawn.” This isn’t a case of dumbing down the news. It’s about balance.
Your next offer of proof regarding politicians doesn’t pass muster. Anyone who speaks in a monotone voice, shows no measure of emotion or empathy can be viewed as stiff or boring. This can lose the message. This can happen in colleges/universities, churches, and in politics. The need to be entertained is a secondary or even tertiary thought to the attention paid to the emotion or personal feelings delivered by the speaker. It adds to the creditably of the speaker by their listeners (Beck, Limbaugh, Matthews, et al).
Your claim “Our schools have to take special care to keep the lesson plans moving swiftly, competing with the pace set by television and computer games, even if the message is a bit cloudy or missed by the majority.” is well, interesting. Research has shown that in each classroom there are different types of learners as well as kids who learn at different paces. Wouldn’t be nice if everyone were always on the same page? Teaching to cover diverse learners is a skill, sir. Not everyone can go into a classroom and be successful in today’s society. The classroom is a microcosm of society. Sad to say, but some kids have not been taught the importance of respect, the value of education, and the ability to believe in themselves. These can be rooted in society, however, the home seems to be the genesis of the problem. This brings me to the next statement.
“Where previous generations of children were given age appropriate entertainment for children, today’s youth are bored stiff with entertainment designed for them. They are given access to entertainment that is violent and sexual beyond their years, while the purveyors of entertainment argue that times have changed and children have evolved. There is no real evolution, only overexposure.” This has to do with the home and the parents, not necessarily society.
Furthermore, the idea “In previous times, the average citizen placed primary needs above entertainment–the need for assistance, freedom, education and enlightenment and the need for a cure for the most threatening disease. Now, we fear being bored more than we fear death or destruction of our way of life. And while some factions push for the eradication of our most threatening disease, too many of our mushy-minded citizens would rather point accusing fingers at the victims of AIDS or create ghostly villains who mysteriously promulgate the disease.” I have to say…HUH? Which previous time, again 1900, 1910, 1920? Where did you get the stats for this claim? Who are these entertainment addicts? Do they have jobs? Families? Do they need to eat, have a roof over their heads? If you answered yes to any of those things, they don’t belong in your stats. How about the homeless? Nah, better nix them too.
OK “Much of what we do, think, wear and say is developed for corporate benefit, even as we imagine that we have individual thought and freedom of expression. Even most of the people’s politics and religious views are shaped by mega-corporations, while the people defend beliefs they don’t really understand with tooth and nail.” Floored me. Simple as that. I’m not sure who, where, or how this sheeple world you’re referring to exists. I do what I think or believe is best for me. I wear what I wear not because some rap star tells me too. Sony, APPLE, and GM do not control my thoughts or actions. Your assertion that most people live like this is disconcerting. I do not follow GM (MSNBC) or Murdoch (Fox) to frame my opinions. I look at the speeches, the votes, the records to gain my information. Most of my friends and family do too.
Finally, it occurred to me that this is not/was not an opinion piece on Black demeaning comedy, as much as it is a diatribe against an alleged evolution of society or the ever-changing American culture. If you want to debate whether the telling of some Black jokes are appropriate or not, that’s fine. I happen to think that when it comes to comedy, everything is on the table! That’s probably why I’m not a comedian. To claim that we are lazy and laugh when nothing is a funny due to the fact we have been dumbed down or have been brain-washed by corporate puppetmasters is not proven by your essay. Much love to you and your website. You are doing a service to the community! Keep up the good work!
Samuel Wilson