(ThyBlackMan.com) Everybody must be lying except R. Kelly.
For you to support R. Kelly, that is what you must believe. Otherwise it’s difficult to reconcile supporting the singer/songwriter on any level, artistic or otherwise. We can have the shallow and rehashed debate of separating the artist from his/her artistry, but to do so is to deny the alleged yet systemic underlying criminal behavior in this particular case. If I am of the minority opinion that dangerous criminal behavior always supersedes artistic brilliance, so be it. I sleep well nightly.
Along those lines, for the expanse of Kelly’s career there has been a documented pattern and pathology, one allegedly connected with pedophilia.
If you are indifferent to the treatment of girls and women, stop reading now and retire with my opening sentence.
“Everybody must be lying except R. Kelly.”
This week, Kelly’s former manager Jeff Kwatinetz filed suit against the singer/songwriter, alleging that a million dollars owed to him was instead used to pay off multiple, underage accusers related to statutory sexual misconduct.
Everybody, including the former manager must be lying, except for R. Kelly.
Last month, Kelly’s former personal assistant and road manager Demetrius Smith released the book, Man Behind the Man, which chronicles among other things, Kelly’s marriage to then-15-year-old Aaliyah and other relationships with numerous underage girls.
Something tells me that Jeff Kwatinetz has a forthcoming subpoena with Smith’s name on it.
Everybody, including the former manager and road manager must be lying, except for R. Kelly…right?
Another one of Kelly’s managers, George Daniels and wife/publicist Regina Daniels simultaneously walked out of R. Kelly’s life after it was revealed that Kelly had “courted” their then-underage daughter.
He (Kelly) denied it. He lied to me to my face. The reason that I’m talking abut this, it’s not just for me, it’s not for my wife, it’s not for my daughter (Maxine), but it’s for the public. It’s for other fathers and mothers because it doesn’t have to be a superstar, it could be the dude on the corner. There are guys who sit around and give your child a couple of bucks to go to school and then wait until they get a little older, then they set that trap. See, so I’m doing this really for everyone.”
George Daniels on 102.3 KJLH Radio – Feb. 2008
Something tells me that Jeff Kwatinetz has two more subpoenas with the Daniels names on them.
Everybody, including two former managers, road manager and his publicist must be lying…because that’s the only way R. Kelly isn’t rightfully treated as a sexual predator of the worst kind. The pedophilia, its pattern and pathology are being corroborated by multiple sources via public statements, books and now a lawsuit. These aren’t anonymous sources of vague connection or questionable association to Kelly. They are reputable, separate and unrelated confidantes who have worked with and by the side of Kelly for the better part of his career.
Yes, everybody must be lying except R. Kelly. That must be the case. It’s the only reasonable explanation for why he’s received such a free pass.
Kelly supporters will be quick to cite the fact that he was found not guilty of child pornography charges almost three years ago to the day. This is the legalese Jedi mind trick that some use to deflect from the obvious. The “not guilty” verdict of 2008 only spoke to one videotape of one girl on one given occasion. In no way did the verdict serve as a blank check to cover the fullness of Kelly’s behavior.
R. Kelly may have been found “not guilty,” but he sure as hell is not innocent.
If the Bishop Eddie Long saga taught us anything, it’s that truly innocent men don’t pay people off to avoid prosecution or embarrassment due to sexual behavior. Jeff Kwatinetz is clear on this distinction and has gone on the record in the form of a lawsuit to make sure the rest of us are clear too.
Curiously enough, one of Kelly’s supporters as of late has been media personality Tavis Smiley, whose book imprint SmileyBooks is publishing Kelly’s forthcoming memoir Soulacoaster.
(Full disclosure: I worked for Smiley from 2005-2010)
We are thrilled to be the conduit through which R. Kelly will tell his own story,” said Tavis Smiley, founder and publisher of SmileyBooks. “He has earned the right to tell his story his own way.”
Tavis Smiley – SmileyBooks press release December, 2009
Actually, R. Kelly didn’t “earn” anything. A book deal is a privilege, as are Smiley’s television and radio properties. Nevertheless, the personal endorsement says volumes.
Then, here in 2011…
I’m suggesting to you if you think that the way we treat women in this country, with patriarchy still alive and well, sexism still alive and well, is determinative or demonstrative of how well our democracy runs, I think you don’t understand how maltreated women are still in this society. That’s all I’m saying.”
Smiley went further…
I don’t think there is a worser (sic) version of sexism. It’s either right or it’s wrong, it’s acceptable or it’s unacceptable. You’re trying to shade this thing Bill.”
Tavis Smiley – HBO’s Real Time with Bill Maher – Feb. 2011
Full video of exchange HERE.
Nothing says “patriarchy” and “sexism” quite like one man singing the praises (pun intended) of the male, oft-alleged sexual predator.
Being “thrilled” at the prospect of profiting from R. Kelly is curious given the well-documented history. Patriarchy and sexism go beyond the obvious actions of the offenders. It also involves who we passively support, what we consciously uplift and the public justifications of both.
If patriarchy and sexism were crimes, then complicity in either makes one an accessory.
Smiley publishing R. Kelly’s memoir while simultaneously criticizing the treatment of women in America is akin to publishing and profiting from the biography of former BART officer Johannes Mehserle, while decrying police brutality and the murder of Oscar Grant.
Advocacy requires consistency…and dare I say…
Wait for it…
Accountability.
If Smiley is truly of the mind that women are maltreated in this society, providing a platform for R. Kelly (and profit stream for himself) is not only confusing, it’s a strong indictment of everything in which Smiley’s advocacy is purportedly based.
(Sexism) It’s either right or it’s wrong, it’s acceptable or it’s unacceptable.
Let’s not try to shade this thing.
It is more than slightly problematic, reconciling the idea of a youth foundation and a widely-alleged pedophile under the same banner and brand. Who knows, maybe Roman Polanski’s schedule was full and Woody Allen was on vacation; let’s not jump to conclusions. We don’t know all the details and back story.
But of course…everybody is lying except for R. Kelly, so it’s all good…right?
I get it, really I do. Make that paper, playa.
Sometimes, principles get in the way of profit. Or vice-versa, depending on how married one is to one’s principles. I suspect nobody begrudges Smiley’s desire to make an honest buck, just the lack of intellectual honesty in making that same buck.
Reveling in signing R. Kelly to a book deal on Monday and demonizing America’s historical mistreatment of women on Tuesday would give any dues-paying member of the Common Sense Association of America pause. Justifying their compatibility on Wednesday is not only insulting to our intelligence, come Thursday it calls into question the authenticity of Smiley’s historical advocacy.
There is nothing inherently unethical per se about publishing Kelly’s memoir. Social pariahs have had books published for eons. But as long as Smiley is in the business of lecturing the masses on the ills of patriarchy and sexism in America; it’s more than a bit questionable.
Smiley should pick one side of the road and stay there, driving soberly, safely and remaining in his lane.
Smiley is likely aware of this glaring contradiction on some level. As of this writing, Kelly is not mentioned as a SmileyBooks author and Soulacoaster is not listed as “coming soon” title on the company’s website. In fact the link to the original press release is no longer active.
http://www.tavistalks.com/sites/www.tavistalks.com/files/RKelly_PR120809.pdf
Coincidence…I think not…
(A copy of the release in its entirety can be found HERE)
Nevertheless, the R. Kelly memoir is still slated for sale, November 1. It would seem that all principles come with a price tag. It’s backtracking to be sure, but only for the sake of minimizing public criticism, not private revelation as to right and wrong. It’s either right or it’s wrong, it’s acceptable or it’s unacceptable. Let’s not try to shade this thing. Website and press release removal are clear examples of “shading.”
Everybody must be lying except for R. Kelly. That said, you can read Kelly’s “truth” for $25.95; coming soon to Amazon.com and other fine retailers.
There are soundbites and then there is sincerity. Do not confuse the two. Smiley is loathe to publicly acknowledge certain realities, such as when viewing a person head-on, it is easy to see when words emanate from both sides of his/her mouth.
If we as a country are truly about the business of changing the way women, especially women of color are treated, then we should not ever uplift those who are directly connected to their mistreatment. Respecting women requires more than televised fiery oratory and cool, catchy slogans on “leadership.”
It requires sincerity, consistency and authenticity. Sexism is either right or it’s wrong. If it’s the latter, then it’s also wrong to sell it for a profit.
Written By Morris O’Kelly
Official website; http://mrmokelly.com/
Can someone send us the link to watch the interview of R. Kelly with Tavis Smiley because I could not find it here: http://www.tavistalks.com/tv? Thanks!
If R. Kelly raped a family member of yours, this would NOT have been your first statement regarding the pedophilia of R. Kelly.
_____________________
“This article was confusing and self serving to the author. If you want someone to focus on you (Morris Kelly), then write about you. You shifted and stripped through gears just to talk about a man you piggybacked off of for years. You sound as if you’re jealous and angry with Tavis.”
______________________
You are obviously lying “David”…where the truth begins or ends, who knows. But you’re lying.
My forth time…fifth…sixth
Folks, it’s very odd that you’re riding this thing hard as you are. If I agree with you, why act as if you’re investigating a murder? How about relaxing and turning your attention to other things than this post. I’m sure I’m important in your minds but turn the page.
I said in my initial comment, he was doing good with the rkelly (emphasis on the lower case) piece until it went east…in my opinion. Now, if the title were: Tavis & rkelly, the book (emphasis on the lower case)…Supporter, Pedophile and Both Stupid… then the read could have taken me through.
If its true Tavis is planning to work with this boy, I do believe Tavis should deny and separate himself from him especially if he claims to be a Christian man.
So, if any of you keep saying I’m with Tavis, stop being so paranoid. You’ve turned my simple comment into things it’s not. It’s all focused on my because of my comment to the poster.
I don’t listen to Tavis so I can’t comment like you want me to. However, the other boy! I can.
Here’s something for your little heads…rkelly raped my 13 year old family member. Plain and simple. So keep on with your foolish comments!
What I found strange (beyond the obvious Smiley company vernacular) is that anyone supposedly absolutely against R. Kelly and has a personal beef with him as David contends…
Then why would his very first comment be a criticism of the author who is articulating an opinion in agreement with his?
The enemy of my enemy is my friend maybe?
Oh that’s right…he’s a plant. Yes, try to discredit the author who is in supposed absolute agreement with him as to R. Kelly who he also supposedly despises.
Some people don’t lie very well.
david’s words….
Strangely enough, on the rkelly issue, I completely agree with you and I stated from the beginning I wanted to read about the filthy man. I too have personal beef with him and his time is coming where….well let me stop.
Hey “david”…I’m curious about two things.
1. Where is this statement where you “completely agree” and “stated from the beginning”?
2. Can you tell us about your “personal beef” with Tavis….I mean R.Kelly?
I’m just so intrigued by you. Since we agree that R.Kelly is disgusting and as you intimated should receive what is coming to him. Do you find it equally disturbing that a public figure namely Tavis Smiley has yet to distance himself from R.Kelly?
Oh and one last thing….how would you recommend the average guy or gal speak out against R.Kelly and those public figures who openly support him?
Signed,
Still relaxed but curious too.
Mo I hope everyone can see what has been made so plainly obvious. You can’t and won’t be debated on the issues but it will be about anything but the issues. This is wrong on Smiley’s part and there is no excuse. Wrong to publish it, wrong to come after you and wrong to try to hide it all after the fact.
And “David” wants to talk about something being ungodly and not start with R. Kelly? That is the level of lunacy and stupidity out there.
Thank you “david” .
Signed,
Two servings of relaxation and hold the animation please.
Your very first post was a false accusation about me. Not sure what to tell you.
And this is like the third time you said you’re out. Is the third time the charm? Or will there be a fourth.
As a writer, don’t make false accusations without apologies. I’m not exposed nor working for whom ever you think….okay, now I’m out!!!
Thank you David. That’s all anyone wanted.
There’s nothing wrong with disliking the supposed presentation of the issue. But ultimately, it reeks of an agenda to only address the presentation and not the issue itself.
It’s more than slightly odd to accuse me of an agenda, but go way out of your way to duck the issue presented.
Thank you for answering the question directly.
Be well.
And I check NO! A big fat NO…to answer your question the way you need it. I don’t support none of them?
Last…Wendy, why are you so animated? I don’t like r kelly no more than you. I don’t like what tavis is doing. I don’t agree with the way morris wrote this but that’s me. I’m not protecting and siding with anyone. My job is not in this arena so relax. As God as my witness I’m not. I’m just a simple man who got the post via facebook so I responded to how I feel. Strangely enough, on the rkelly issue, I completely agree with you and I stated from the beginning I wanted to read about the filthy man. I too have personal beef with him and his time is coming where….well let me stop.
Be blessed all
Deuces David.
Yes…David is “done” and didn’t answer the question.
Here’s one simple question for the two of you; Can someone really stand on the platform of fair and equal treatment of women AND endorse,publish,or support R. Kelly? Check []yes or [] no.
You’re exposed. Give Mr. Smiley my regards.
Self-serving you say?
How is preaching the ills of patriarchy and sexism on one day while already have celebrated the signing of R. Kelly of all people to a book deal the previous day not self-serving?
You can’t be serious. Highlighting hypocrisy. Not hard to understand. We can do this all day. You get off work at 6pm and will conveniently disappear for the weekend. Imagine that.
I’m done! I said what I needed. My book is closed and I’m moving onto more productive things. I disagree with Tavis, Morris, r kelly (emphasis on the lowercase) and any supporter of this garbage. Have a blessed one!
Signed,
Never to read from this poster
This isn’t of God?
But R. Kelly and pedophilia is? Wendy point blank asked you…
“Here’s one simple question for the two of you; Can someone really stand on the platform of fair and equal treatment of women AND endorse,publish,or support R. Kelly? Check []yes or [] no.”
That’s not cosigning…that’s a question.
You didn’t answer it and now have the nerve to bring the Lord into it. You keep skipping over the R. Kelly part to address the Tavis part.
David/Sarah/Big Z…I’m not fooled and I’m not amused.
Answer the question Wendy posed…
Here’s one simple question for the two of you; Can someone really stand on the platform of fair and equal treatment of women AND endorse,publish,or support R. Kelly? Check []yes or [] no.
It requires a yes or a no…no co-sign.
If you read my comment, it is what it is. I was sent the article on facebook. Not because I’m trying to follow the writer. It’s asinine to think the only people who can use words or phrases belongs to a certain group. Quiet as kept, I’m not in your field of work, nor do I work for any of the people mentioned and it’s used in my church where I worship, on my place of work and also heard it from others across this land so stop being paranoid and thinking someone is watching you. You’re not known to me nor my large community of people….trust me.
Again I say, this is self-serving. Just look at all the cosigning and attacks. Just move on and stop trying to excite people to comment. This isn’t of God nor did he give you this platform. You created it from your mind. All I see is you wanting to make a name for yourself. Try rolling with Christ and doing is will, not your own.
For people will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, arrogant, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, ungrateful, unholy, -2 Timothy 3:2
If you deny yourself, you may have a chance…wink
@Lindsey,
Be nice. Let’s remain above the fray. When you are in the right, you don’t have to go there. But I am appreciative of your support. Let’s temper the namecalling. It’s not what I do and I don’t want anyone reading this to lose sight of the seriousness of the issues and have it dismissed for other reasons.
But to answer your question though:
“David” does happen to be the middle name of someone who works very close, VERY close to Tavis and “Sarah” also happens to be the same of that same person’s daughter.
But that’s all just a coincidence I’m sure. :/
Yes, I could call that person out by name, but like I said, I will remain above the fray.
No BigZ, pedophilia and discussing the seriousness of it is not stupid. Selling books while posing as an advocate for women’s rights is. I guess the Smiley PR machine had to go back to the drawing board because yesterday’s strategy blew up in their face.
Hey Mo, were they at least not dumb enough to use their real names?
I guess they got what they wanted, the focus off of the Tavis/R. Kelly connection. Instead we are just talking about the Tavis Crab wells Fargo Obama jealous pedophilia R.Kelly profiting connection.
That seems to have worked out well for them. Gold star for the director of PR or Crisis PR team!
Idiots!
Whatever! It’s all stupid!
BigZ…
I understood you perfectly. I don’t think the other commenters were including you in that group.
It’s all good and I accept your comments in the true spirit they were intended. As you explained, this is about R. Kelly.
Agreed.
Let me be very clear…for the Morris camp, I don’t work for Tavis nor care to know all the things he, you or anyone does. I was interested in the R. Kelly story because I personally can’t stand the dude! All this other stuff I can care less. Feel me? I wouldn’t buy a book from Tavis, R. Kelly or Morris. I have a personal issue with R. Kelly
Sounds like you all are about other stuff. Almost like high school. All this protecting and cosigning garbage.
FYI, I was sent the link because of my personal hangups with R. Kelly, not because the writter is known or I know him. I detect some underline bull in here. I’m out.
Last, write what you wish, my eyes are closed
Some would like to make this personal. It’s not, just principled. Pedophilia is not only wrong, it is criminal. Not only that, it’s not necessarily a good look to take a public stand relative to the maltreatment of women while scheduling in-store meet and greets to sell R. Kelly’s memoir.
I stand by what I’ve always said. I appreciate everything Smiley did for me personally and professionally. I learned a lot from him and it would be a lie to say otherwise.
At the same time, pedophilia is still illegal and probably not appropriate as a selling point by those who espouse to care about the treatment of women.
It’s not rocket science. Really it’s not. If Tavis Smiley would like to publicly make his case, I would welcome that. It would be a nice departure from the social media strategy presently employed in which he instructs employees to post on his behalf.
:/
Aren’t we all adults?
I guess the hired help can only post during business hours. They aren’t paid to social network and post propaganda during th evening. If they come back tomorrow we can smack them around some more. The truth will always win out. Travis should be thanking you for all the free publicity. There is a sucker born every minute. Somebody will buy that filth.
My guess is Tavis wants to handle YOU more than the issues at hand. When all else fails launch an attack on the truth teller or create a diversion and maybe no one will ask Tavis to pick a side.
As I stated before,he can never represent me in any form or fashion. On the other hand, I do wish Tavis would speak up and let us know how he can represent both sides without being accountable to either. In my book saying nothing…is saying something. We hear you Tavis loud and clear.
HA! Knew it! BWUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
@ Truth, Wendy and Lindsey…
First, thank you for the words of encouragement. I appreciate your willingness to keep the discussion focused on the real issues, not the misdirection.
But here is some insight.
While working for my previous employer there were some things that were ALWAYS stressed. #1, “Stay in your lane” and #2-#10, make sure you spell the brand and the properties correctly.
David said:
______________
“Why don’t you stay in your lane and stay focused on one topic. Here you have 4!…
Morris O’Kelly and his thoughts
R.Kelly,
SmileyBooks”
______________
The odds of someone using “stay in your lane” (a staff/company credo) IMMEDIATELY out of the gate in this discussion are astronomical in nature. That is Smiley Group speak.
Secondly, the only people (outside of me) who would be so careful to spell “SmileyBooks” appropriately, complete with capital “B” would either be Tavis himself or an employee. Also, who really outside of a Tavis-related entity engages in this type of comment section leading with the publisher’s name?
Thirdly, people don’t refer to articles pegged as “Mo’Kelly” by my full name.
No doubt, these are hired hands to help shape the spin of this discussion.
Might I recommend that if someone is going to pose as a “random” commenter, you try not to make it so easy to figure out.
Do better guys…do better.
You are killing them Mo’Kelly. Do NOT let up. Just laughing at the Smiley machine desperation. Nobody cared to let his people know that we don’t care about him 1/100 as much as we do our children and unprotected minors. Looking forward to hear Smiley talk about his youth foundation and R. Kelly in the same interview. But then blame it on MoKelly.
When you are right MoKelly, the other side gets desperate. Enjoy this. You deserve it. Fabulous job and insight. Preach on!
Tell it Miss Wendy. Who really skips over R. Kelly to defend Tavis Smiley other than a hired flak? That should let you know Mo you’re doing something right. Mo is talking about preserving and protecting girls and women and these jokers surf in to protect their employer. It won’t work.
It will be interesting to see what the Crab Man says publicly about this. Publish the book and take the heat or not publish and take the loss.
I wonder what Tom Joyner is gonna say?
Well Mo’Kelly once again you are correct, ”Everybody (including yourself) must be lying except R. Kelly”.
@ David and Sarah… Really?! How did you miss all those points, references, videos and pretty pictures?
Here’s one simple question for the two of you; Can someone really stand on the platform of fair and equal treatment of women AND endorse,publish,or support R. Kelly? Check []yes or [] no.
If the two of you are a part of T. Smiley PR, I get it, do what you’re being paid to do. But in the real world Tavis Smiley will never be a voice for me or my rights.
So Sarah or David or Tavis Smiley press corp. Feel like talking about the pedophile? And nobody comments repeatedly on stories they either are bored by or don’t care about.
Saying a writer is jealous is a silly comeback.
Stick to the facts of the article. Otherwise you have nothing meaningful to add.
MoKelly continues to tell the truth and wear weaker minds out. Pedophilia is wrong. Let Travis speak for himself and defend publishing the book and not send his cronies to crawl the web.
Hey Mo. I got your back. Sexism is wrong and so are Obama Crab haters who publish books in support of it.
Thank you Truth.
Eventually commenters (still laughing at your comments about the PR people coming to post, very funny), but eventually commenters will come around to the real issue and it is inescapable.
It’s fine though. Thanks for the levity.
If these fools want to talk about Mr. Crab-in-a-barrel I will oblige them. Last months it was Cornell West talking slick about the president with Tavis’ hand in his back making his lips move. What a joke anyone calling someone who LEGITIMATELY and RIGHTFULLY speaks out against supporting pedophilia and in support of women and girls as jealous. It isn’t jealousy it is HONORABLE.
So yeah, we can talk about Tavis and all of his foolishness. I never worked for the man. Am I somehow jealous too?
R. Kelly is a pedophile. MoKelly is a damn fine writer. You all have it confused. Tavis is the one selling the books of a pedophile to grease his pockets.
If anybody is jealous it is him. And if anybody says they haven’t read your work they are LYING. you are regularly published here, HuffPost and EURWEB. for them to know R Kelly Tavis but not somehow find this website and not have read you before is BS.
These are hired PR people to keep the heat off Travis “Don’t call me Wells Fargo/Obama-Hater” Smiley.
MoKelly
You do you! You print a beautiful editorial with facts, links and truth regarding PEDOPHILIA. And the only real complaint or response has to do with you and Tavis the Obama-hater?
What a joke. The only reason anybody knows you had any connection to him is through your full disclosure.
Sounds like Smiley sent his employees and PR people to post. How they bypassed mentioning R. Peodophile is a joke.
Keep telling the truth! If Smiley can criticize and hold the president accountable “in love” then I guess h should not be above the same criticism.
Keep it up man!
@Big Z…I hear you…I do.
Some people would rather talk about me than the pedophile. Go figure. Such is the case with fandom.
Sarah…I always respond to everyone regarding all of my work this is no different.
As for “thinking” David took personal shots at me. It’s there in text. It is what it is.
If this is a “yawn” to you, the real question is whether you’d like to talk about the issues or continue to talk about me. To continue to comment about either instead of the issues suggests that this is not only a yawn, but you are desirous to deflect from the issues.
Which is fine. The facts still remain.
Thank you too for responding.
Wow!!! I can see that! It does begin with MoKelly blah bah blah! Then he throws in “I worked for Smiley from 2005-2010″…
Who cares what you did my dude! I’m trying to read about this clown (R. Kelly) and I get sidetrack with other stuff! STICK TO YOUR TOPIC! R. Kelly is a pedophile! Plan and simple…
Mr. Morris, you have to get out of your way and just do the work. I feel the same as the other posters or commenters. I yawned, I believe I hear jealousy and I totally agree with David. How you responded to David is pretty much all we needed to hear except you think someone takes personal shots at you. I’m not familiar with anything you’ve done and so aren’t a lot of people reading this. I was just as bored as watching paint dry. I’m curious, are you offended by people responding how hey feel? No one doesn’t need to have anything personal with you nor do they need to have met you to comment. Who does that? Smh…
Morris, no we have not met. Don’t know you. I do agree with some of your post but if you read like we all have, it’s you putting the “I” in the article. You start the article about R. Kelly and then you veer off to you and then Tavis Smiley. Oh! And then the publishing company.
We were bamboozled to think the article was all about the demise of R. Kelly but you spent a lot of time talking about something and someone else.
@David,
Thank you for your comments. Some things I noticed. You seem to take personal umbrage with me. I don’t think we’ve met. I only mention that because anyone acquainted with the fullness of my work implicitly knows I deal with issues of great importance to our community, be it Eddie Long, Russell Simmons, the AME church or in this case R. Kelly.
I say that to say…it’s not about ‘me.’ Maybe you are aware of some back story I am not.
I won’t comment about Tavis beyond what I’ve already said in the piece. It’s not about him personally, it’s about his public and professional stances and statements which fly directly in the face of publishing R. Kelly’s memoir. He was a tremendous asset in my professional growth and continue to call him my friend. Please separate legitimate critique from personal animus.
Huge difference.
My greatest concern is that we make too many concessions for behavior simply because he or she has exceptional talent elsewhere.
Let’s be clear. The value of any R. Kelly memoir is inextricably linked to the story related to Aaliyah (a 15-year old), child pornography charges and trial and other closely-associated themes. A thousand books have been written about music stars and their paths to success. The hook of ANY R. Kelly book (authorized or unauthorized accounts of his life/career) is tied to pedophilia…period.
Have R. Kelly announce he’s writing his memoir and acknowledge that there will be no mention of the pedophilia allegations/situations in it and see what happens. Not only would he be pressed to find a publisher, he would be pressed to find eventual consumers to buy it even if he found a publisher.
Let’s collectively not be naive.
Randomhouse publishing the memoir is one thing. Its mission is not advocacy-driven but sales-driven. A social advocate, concerned with the supposed maltreatment of women and more specifically women of color is something altogether different.
Such a contradiction must be highlighted. Otherwise I’m not doing what the Lord put me here to do.
The news story is that within the past month two associates of Kelly are making all types of new and heretofore unheard allegations.
Combine this with the fact that the coming memoir is being published by a confirmed and unabashed social advocate for African-Americans and women, and then you have an issue that must be acknowledged and dealt with in the public space.
If you would like to address the seriousness of these issues presented, I’m here. If not, thank you for both reading and responding.
This article was confusing and self serving to the author. If you want someone to focus on you (Morris Kelly), then write about you. You shifted and stripped through gears just to talk about a man you piggybacked off of for years. You sound as if you’re jealous and angry with Tavis. You were doing well with the R. Kelly business but you went into a tale wind about everything else. Why don’t you stay in your lane and stay focused on one topic. Here you have 4!…
Morris O’Kelly and his thoughts
R.Kelly,
SmileyBooks
Tavis Smiley the man I once idolized
yawn…
Jealousy is an ugly thing.
This guy, R Kelly, is totally sick. I really could care less about him but what gets me is that he still has a large black female following after his twisted history has been exposed. A lot of black women always run their mouths about black men not respecting them while many of them will still buy his CDs and any other trash he puts out.