The first: the dump has been there for decades. The feds, the state, and the county knew about its existence and dangerous toxicity. Yet it took decades for the state to finally act on the clean-up and then only after it had been ordered to do so.

The second: environmental hazards draw major media attention almost exclusively when there is a perilous toxic hazard such as a massive oil spell, or chemical plant explosion. The other time is when environmentalists demand greater protection for plant and animal habitats or warn of the potentially deadly impact of the greenhouse climate effect.

The third. This is the most enraging. The toxin dump that the state was ordered to clean up was in South L.A. The residents almost exclusively are low income, African Americans and Hispanics. It fits a horrid pattern that has become all too familiar in recent years. That is giving short shrift if not a deaf ear to the complaints of Blacks and Hispanics about the threat of toxic exposure in their neighborhoods.

South L.A. is a near textbook example of this tone deafness on the hazards. In June 2026, L.A. County officials posted a map on its website of the areas in the county exposed to toxins. Two years earlier an environmental advocacy group did a similar study which it headlined “Top Hot Spots in L.A. County.” One of the leading “hotspots” was areas of South L.A. The hazard contamination numbers were eye popping. Air pollution, drinking water, and the ground water in the area all topped ninety percent. There was no indication that few and state county officials had implemented any special actions to mitigate the potential hazards.

The lack of official action on the problem tossed the glare on an ugly truth which has been quietly hidden for years. Chemical toxins and waste dumping in poor Black and Hispanic communities has a long history. A 1983 federal report found that three out of four toxic waste dumping and landfills in the South, for instance, were “surrounded” by poor Black communities.

Four years later another study reaffirmed the spread and impact of toxic waste dumping in these communities. It reiterated what by then environmental justice activists and increasingly a number of federal and state agencies acknowledged that “communities with greater minority percentages of the population are more likely to be the sites of commercial hazardous waste facilities.”

The issue by then had galvanized some Black communities in the South and now other communities of color in other parts of the country to act. In 1991, activists convened the First National People of Color Environmental Leadership Summit. In Washington DC.

It was not just poor communities in the South that were the sole targets of toxic waste, chemical and garbage dumping. But Native Americans, Asians, and Hispanic told of frightening tales of and cited examples of waste and garbage dumping in their areas. “The summit was about people of color taking charge of their destiny,” said one leading activist.

Environmental activists cite several things that the high contamination areas have in common. There are fewer regulations, weaker standards of enforcement and compliance and they were located near factories, landfills, or industrial sites. The residents are more likely to live near highways or areas where industrial waste is dumped. This virtually ensures that those continually exposed to garbage and toxic waste dumping will suffer far greater rates of asthma, cancer, and other illnesses due to constant exposure to poor air quality, contaminated water, or unsafe living conditions.

They note that the toxic chemical and waste dumping problem is neither new nor accidental. The apt label for this careless and ignored practice of toxic and waste pile ups in minority neighborhoods is environmental racism. The proof of the often official indifference to the practice is that it took more than four decades to order clean-up of the toxin dump in the South L.A. neighborhood.

Despite the mountain of laws, ordinances, and state and federal laws, regulations against toxic waste and garbage dumping, the use of these communities as dumping grounds has continued unabated. The systemic burdens of race, class, political, legal, and environmental threats present a toxic mix of higher-than-average illness and death to countless numbers of persons. That is certainly the case in South L.A. And state and county officials know it.

Written By Earl Ofari Hutchinson

One can find more info about Mr. Hutchinson over at the following site; TheHutchinson Report.

Also feel free to connect with him through twitter; http://twitter.com/earlhutchins

He is also an associate editor of New America Media. His forthcoming book is From King to Obama: Witness to a Turbulent History (Middle Passage Press).

Asked recently on NBC’s “Meet the Press” whether he supports Medicare for All, Jeffries replied it is “not legislation that I am currently cosponsoring or that I support.”

In 2022, while seeking reelection, Jeffries wrote, “I have cosponsored the Medicare for All Act every Congress that I’ve been a Representative.” He entered Congress in 2013. His name appeared on single-payer legislation repeatedly, including the Medicare for All Acts of 2019 and 2021.

So, what happened? Did Jeffries take a closer look at the health systems of Canada and Britain, which the left insists America should emulate?

Medicare for All is marketed as compassionate, simple and “free.” It is none of the three. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimated that it would require $25 trillion to $35 trillion in federal financing over 10 years. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that single-payer plans would increase federal healthcare subsidies by $1.5 trillion to $3 trillion in 2030 alone.

How would Washington raise that money? There are not enough millionaires and billionaires to foot the bill. So now what?

CRFB calculated that financing a $30 trillion plan could require a 32% payroll tax, a 25% income surtax or more than doubling the national debt. Even doubling all individual and corporate income-tax collections would not fully cover the highest estimates.

Advocates insist that families would no longer pay premiums, deductibles and out-of-pocket expenses. But shifting a bill from an insurer to the IRS does not make it disappear — and does not make it free. Promising unlimited care does not create unlimited doctors, nurses, hospital beds or operating rooms.

Americans doubt Washington can keep its current healthcare promises. A 2025 survey found 80% of people not yet enrolled in Medicare worry that the program would not be there when they become eligible.

CBO warned that under single-payer, increased demand would exceed increased supply, producing more unmet demand. There is, however, a “solution” for this: waiting lines.

Look at Britain. The latest British Social Attitudes survey found only 26% satisfied with the National Health Service, while 51% were dissatisfied. Asked about NHS care over the next five years, 53% expected it to worsen — including 15% who said, “much worse.” Only 16% expected improvement; 29% expected it to remain about the same.

In England, the BBC reported in March that 16% of nearly 2,600 people surveyed used private care during the previous year, up from 9% two years earlier. Four in 10 who paid for care cited long NHS waits.

The wealthier the patient, the easier the escape. The survey found that 35% of those earning more than $108,000 used private care, compared with 10% of those earning less than $27,000.

At the time, England had more than 7 million cases on its elective-treatment waiting list. Roughly 2.5 million had waited longer than 18 weeks, and more than 100,000 had waited over a year.

Look at Canada. An Ipsos poll in 2025 found 56% satisfied with their provincial system. Yet a newer Nanos survey found 70% dissatisfied with the state of healthcare, and that nine in 10 want major change. The Canadian Medical Association acknowledges that about 20% of Canadians awaiting elective surgery wait more than a year.

Claude Castonguay, often called the father of Quebec medicare, declared the system in “crisis.” He recommended a greater private-sector role so patients could exercise freedom of choice. In 2009, incoming Canadian Medical Association president Dr. Anne Doig was more direct: “We all agree that the system is imploding.”

America’s system has problems: high prices, maddening paperwork, uneven access and too little transparency. Reform it. Increase competition. Expand portable coverage. Give consumers price information. Strengthen the safety net for those truly unable to pay.

But do not pretend government can abolish scarcity with a comforting name. Do Americans want taxes high enough to finance another $30 trillion in federal promises? Do they want Washington deciding what doctors and hospitals will be paid? Do they want British-style waiting lists and Canadian-style delays?

Jeffries apparently thinks not, too — at least “currently.” The question is whether he changed his mind after studying the costs and inconveniences Americans would not tolerate. Or did Jeffries merely change his answer — ahead of the midterm elections — after studying the polls?

Columnist; Larry Elder

Official website; http://www.larryelder.com

That deserves a long pause. This is a brother who came up out of Charleston, raised by his mama on love and not much money. He built Hootie and the Blowfish with a few college buddies back in 1986, moved records by the truckload, then crossed over into country when plenty of folks swore a Black face had no business on that stage. Four decades of proving people wrong. Now, sitting on all of it, he says he might step away from the road in a couple years, maybe squeeze in another run with the old crew before he calls it.

None of this comes from somebody running on empty either. Lately he has spent time living and recording in London, cutting fresh tracks at Abbey Road, and looking ahead to life with his fiancée, Emily Deahl, with a Charleston celebration reportedly planned for February 2027. He even turned up at the American Music Awards out in Las Vegas back in spring, receiving the Veterans Voice Award and performing with Hootie and the Blowfish. New music is in the works, with another solo album expected to follow 2023’s Carolyn’s Boy. On every old yardstick he is winning. Yet he keeps catching himself, asking why he is pushing this hard at 60.

Here is the part that got me. He did not talk about being tired of the songs. Instead he talked about wanting to stay in the house. “I’m really starting to like being home a lot,” he said. Simple words. Grown words. The kind of admission that takes a certain age to make without feeling like you failed somewhere.

I want to sit a minute with the older Black men reading this, the ones who came up the way I did. We got taught young that a man’s value lives in his output. Provide. Grind. Never let them catch you slowing down. My father’s generation wore exhaustion as a badge of honor. Sunday held church and maybe a nap, then Monday rolled back around and you went and did it again. Nobody handed us the language for rest. Rest read as laziness, and laziness meant everything our people had bled to escape.

So we swallowed it whole. We measured ourselves by what we produced, then passed that same math down to our sons. Plenty of good Black men I know cannot sit still for an hour without guilt creeping in. Retirement scares them worse than any job ever did, because who are they if nobody needs a thing from them?

That is the trap Darius is quietly stepping out of, and I think he is holding a door open for the rest of us.

Consider what he has already earned. He raised his kids. His money flowed back into the city that made him, helping support MUSC Shawn Jenkins Children’s Hospital in Charleston, where a nursing scholarship now carries his mother’s name. Benefit shows for St. Jude. Service as a national chair supporting a museum honoring our music up in Nashville. The receipts run long. Yet the touring machine kept spinning, 110 nights in 2025, hotel after hotel. That same year, his voice gave out during a concert in Atlantic City, a reminder that even a legend has limits.

At some point you have to ask what all that motion is protecting you from.

It happens more than we care to admit, solid men reaching the end of a working life only to confront an emptiness they never built anything to hold. Decades they spent defining themselves by the clock and the paycheck, and when both went silent, they struggled to recognize the life waiting on the other side. Nobody ever told them a fishing trip could count, that a slow morning holds value, that watching your grandbaby figure out how to walk is no consolation prize for the career left behind. It is the prize.

Darius said he is eyeing one more big run with Hootie, and I respect that fully. He even wants their final show to happen at Williams-Brice Stadium, back in the state where the whole story began. A man gets to pick his own last dance. What moves me is that he is choosing it on purpose instead of running the road until the road runs him. There is dignity in deciding when you have done enough, rather than letting a schedule or your body settle the matter for you in some hospital hallway.

We ought to preach this in the barbershop and repeat it at the cookout. Our worth was not the thing we made. It was not the overtime or the second gig or the way we could outlast everybody in the room. Those things kept the lights on, and Lord knows they mattered. But they were the means, brother. They were never meant to become the whole man.

Scripture speaks of a season for everything, and I believe that down to my bones. There is a time to build and push and sweat, and there comes a time to set the hammer down and look at what your hands put together. Too many of our elders did not reach that second part. They died with the tools still balled up in their fists.

Darius has enough sense to feel the season turning. He notices the pull of his own front porch, and rather than shame himself over it, he honors it. That is not weakness. It is wisdom finally catching up to a life spent charging hard.

So let me speak to you plainly, if you are past 50 and reading this with your jaw a little tight. You are allowed to want quiet. Waking with no alarm and nobody tugging your sleeve can be a good day, a full day even. Traveling because the mood strikes, seeing your folks while they are still here, sitting on a dock with a line in the water and no agenda whatsoever, all of it counts. It counts as much as any promotion you ever chased.

The grind gave us plenty. It raised neighborhoods and paid tuitions and put pride in our chests when the world kept trying to snatch it away. I won’t talk down on the hustle. But labor was always meant to buy us a destination, and somewhere in the middle we forgot to arrive.

A country star at 60 just reminded us of it. You can love your craft and still be ready to head on home. Both can live inside one man. And when your day comes to lay it down, may you do it like Carolyn’s boy from Charleston, on your own terms, head high, heart already halfway back to the folks who love you.

Staff Writer; Lee Walker

This brother is a fitness trainer with 12 years of experience, focused on building strength, clarity, and real health within the Black community. Through his writing, Mr. Walker hopes to uplift younger Black men and men in general through honest conversations about fitness, financial pressure, fatherhood, discipline, mental wellness, and the importance of brotherhood.

Have questions? Reach me at LeeW@ThyBlackMan.com.

I understand where the feeling comes from. Truly. We watched him tumble down the board in 2025 while weaker prospects heard their names first, and plenty of us felt that fall in our own chests. Some of it looked foul. Yet there is daylight between having a brother’s back and wrapping him in so much padding that he can never move.

He is 24 now, smack in the middle of a 2026 battle for the starting job against Deshaun Watson. Second year in Cleveland, with Todd Monken running the show since he took the reins in January. The veteran got first crack at it. Cleveland’s second-year pro has been clawing to close the gap. None of that is persecution. That is a regular Tuesday in the National Football League.

Remember how his rookie run actually looked. He started the final stretch, went 3 and 4, tossed 7 scores against 10 interceptions, and his QBR settled somewhere around 18.9. Nobody calls those numbers a triumph. Branding them a scandal misses just as badly. They are a baseline. Green passers throw the ball to the wrong jersey. Peyton Manning threw a rookie-record 28 picks in 1998 and still carved out a gold-jacket career. Bradshaw? They booed him out of Pittsburgh early, benched the man more than once, and the rings came much later. Happens to the great ones all the time. They stink early, take their lumps in public, then figure it out. This league does not care what name is stitched across your shoulders.

Here is the part nobody wants to say out loud. A good chunk of the loudest voices online are not protecting the kid at all. They are protecting a storyline. If he sits, it has to be racism. Praise the veteran’s footwork and that becomes sabotage. Mention those 10 giveaways and a beat writer becomes a hater. So a competitor who by every account itches to compete gets frozen into a permanent victim by the same people swearing they love him.

That framing helps him not one bit. None. When you tell a professional that nothing is ever his fault, you are quietly informing him that he holds no power to fix a single thing. Sit with that. You strip a man of his agency and slap a bow on it and call it support.

I have coached a little, watched a lot, and lived long enough to recognize the pattern with our sons. There is a deep instinct among us to shield the young men in our lives, because the world has been swinging at them since forever. That instinct is sacred. It kept a whole lot of us breathing. Every good thing carries a shadow, though, and the shadow here is simple: a boy who never tastes a real consequence never grows into the thing he is chasing.

Losing teaches. Harshly. It mails its lessons collect. Shedeur needs to sail one over a receiver’s head on third and 6, feel that long walk back to the bench, sit in a dim film room on Monday while the tape freezes on a blown coverage read, then go repair it. That grind is how signal-callers get built. There is no elevator past it. Josh Allen handed the ball to defenses again and again before that light clicked on.

Deshaun deserves a fair mention too. The 30-year-old had barely seen live action since 2024 before this preseason, grinding back after rupturing his Achilles and then suffering another rupture of the same tendon that required a second surgery, riding a contract that finally runs dry after this season. Do not paint him as an untouchable monarch guarding the gate. Back nine of a career, the man is just trying to prove the arm still works. Should the younger option play better, that option starts. If not, the incumbent keeps studying tape and waiting a turn. Both truths can sit at the same table.

Preseason has painted a muddy picture so far. Against the Bears, neither guy grabbed the room by the collar, Cleveland ate a 34 to 10 loss, and the moment nobody wanted was a pass that nestled into the wrong colors. Then came Buffalo today, August 22nd, when the staff handed number 2 the whole first half, even though Cleveland rested most of its veteran starters and put him behind a second-string offensive line with mostly backups around him. Shedeur completed his first eight throws and finished 9 of 11 for 74 yards, one touchdown and one interception. Watson followed and went 5 of 12 for 35 yards with an interception as Cleveland lost 31 to 7. Shedeur was the better quarterback on this particular afternoon. None of that means the job belongs to him now. It means he got a fair look and did something with it.

Will he seize the job by September 13 down in Jacksonville? Maybe. Maybe not. Monken still has not named his starter, and Saturday gave him something more to chew on rather than settling the matter cleanly. Shedeur helped himself against Buffalo. Watson did not slam the door. Cleveland still has a preseason finale against New England on August 27, although the staff may make its decision before then. Fine. A clipboard is not a coffin either way. Aaron Rodgers waited 3 seasons in Green Bay. Steve Young studied behind Joe Montana and squeezed every drop from it. Waiting only wrecks a passer who chooses to pout while he waits.

What actually worries me is not the depth chart. It is the noise around it. A whole ecosystem now feeds off manufactured outrage on his behalf, because a wronged prospect prints clicks better than a developing one ever could. Each week they will dig up fresh insult. Maybe a snap count. Then some stray quote. Or a survey that placed him 35th out of 35 veteran quarterbacks entering the season, which, sure, stings, though who on earth cares in August.

The funny twist is that the young man himself seems to grasp all this. Ask about the derby and you get a shrug, plus a line about the only rival worth naming being the face in the mirror. No panic. Zero alibis. Healthier than half the folks defending him from their phones. So there stands a competitor, going hard, while the comment section litigates.

So my plea, from somebody who has watched this business chew up hyped prospects and lift overlooked ones in equal measure: turn him loose. Give him room to fail on a Sunday and answer for it at the podium afterward. A staff should hold him to a standard without anybody screaming for a firing. All of it, the sweet and the sour, is tuition owed.

Deion’s boy is not spun from glass. Locker rooms raised him. Boulder saw that program hauled across his shoulders, 4,134 yards and 37 touchdowns in a final college fall, so the glare of bright lights is old news. Our lane is not to fight his battles. His alone is to fight them.

Stumble, rise, repeat. That is the assignment handed to every kid who ever strapped on a helmet. This franchise gave him an honest shot this August. Against Buffalo, he took one more step toward making the decision difficult. Let the process breathe, and let the rest of us unclench and quit treating a plain old competition like some crime against the culture.

He will be alright. Just clear the room and let him work.

Staff Writer; J.G. Lacour

Covering the NBA, NFL, college basketball, college football, and Major League Baseball from a Black man’s perspective. He loves the full world of sports, but the NFL remains his favorite.

Need to contact this bro, feel free to use this email address; JGLacour@ThyBlackMan.com.

A review of common budget categories can show where your money went, but categories alone cannot explain what the spending was trying to accomplish. A purchase listed under clothing may have been an attempt to feel more confident. A restaurant charge may have purchased relief from exhaustion rather than food alone.

Emotional spending matters because money is doing more than paying for an item. It is being asked to change a feeling. The purchase may create a brief lift, but the original emotion often returns after the novelty fades. When this pattern repeats, temporary comfort can create lasting financial pressure.

The Purchase May Be Solving an Emotional Problem

Most emotional purchases have a purpose, even when that purpose is not financial. Shopping can create stimulation during boredom, distraction during sadness, or a sense of control during uncertainty.

This helps explain why telling yourself to “stop wasting money” may not work. The spending is providing something your mind currently wants, even if the benefit lasts only a short time. Removing the purchase without understanding the need leaves the original problem untouched.

Ask what you hoped would change after buying the item. Perhaps you wanted to feel rewarded, attractive, productive, included, or less stressed. The answer may reveal that the product itself was only one possible solution.

Once the emotional purpose is visible, you can look for alternatives that meet the same need without automatically creating another expense.

Shopping Can Offer a Quick Mood Shift

Buying something can be exciting. You search, compare, imagine owning the item, and complete the transaction. Each stage creates anticipation and gives your attention somewhere specific to go.

The Cleveland Clinic’s explanation of why retail therapy can improve your mood temporarily notes that shopping may offer distraction, anticipation, and a feeling of control. It can also engage reward processes that make the experience feel pleasurable for a short period.

That temporary relief is real, which is why the habit can become attractive. The problem is that the emotional benefit may disappear long before the bill does.

A purchase made during a stressful evening can remain on a credit card for months. The moment of relief ends, but interest, clutter, and regret may continue. Emotional spending becomes especially costly when a brief change in mood creates a much longer financial obligation.

The Reward May Begin Before You Buy

Sometimes the most enjoyable part of shopping is not owning the product. It is imagining what the product might change.

A new planner can represent an organized life. Exercise equipment can represent better health. Furniture can represent a calmer home, while new clothes may represent confidence or social acceptance.

The imagined future creates excitement before the package arrives. Once the item becomes ordinary, however, the promised transformation may not occur. The planner still needs to be used, the equipment requires effort, and the clothes cannot permanently remove insecurity.

Before buying, ask whether you want the object or the version of yourself connected to it. Then identify one action you could take toward that identity without making the purchase.

You might organize one drawer, take a walk, repair something you already own, or wear an outfit you have forgotten. The action tests whether you want the activity itself or only the emotional promise attached to shopping for it.

Stress Spending Often Purchases Relief

Stress reduces patience and makes convenience more appealing. After a demanding day, cooking, comparing prices, or delaying a purchase can feel like one more task you do not have the energy to complete.

Spending can remove that pressure quickly. Food arrives at the door, a problem is replaced with a product, or a difficult emotion is pushed aside by browsing.

This does not mean every convenience purchase is a mistake. Paying for help, prepared food, transportation, or entertainment can be a thoughtful use of money. The difference is whether the spending was planned and whether it solved the problem effectively.

If stress repeatedly creates the same expense, examine the system around it. You may need simpler meals, fewer evening obligations, clearer work boundaries, or a larger amount specifically reserved for convenience.

Cutting the purchase while preserving the exhausting conditions may only increase the chance that the pattern returns.

Sadness Can Turn Shopping Into Self Care

The phrase “I deserve this” often appears during emotional spending. After disappointment, conflict, or a difficult period, buying something can feel like an act of kindness toward yourself.

You may genuinely deserve care, but care and consumption are not always the same thing. A purchase can become a substitute for comfort, rest, support, or honest emotional processing.

This distinction is important because the item may not provide what you actually need. New shoes cannot resolve grief. A home accessory cannot repair loneliness, and an expensive meal cannot remove an unresolved conflict.

Before purchasing comfort, pause and name the feeling as precisely as possible. Sad, lonely, disappointed, anxious, embarrassed, and exhausted may require very different responses.

You may still decide that the purchase is worthwhile. The pause simply gives another form of care the chance to compete with it.

Boredom Spending Is a Search for Stimulation

Boredom can make online shopping especially powerful because stores provide an endless stream of novelty. Every page contains new colors, features, recommendations, and imagined possibilities.

The purchase may be less important than the activity of searching. Browsing fills empty time and gives the brain a series of small decisions. Once the order is complete, anticipation continues through shipping updates and delivery.

If boredom is the trigger, stricter financial rules may not be enough. You also need another source of engagement.

Create a short list of activities that are easy to begin when you feel restless. Include options that require little energy, such as taking a walk, trying a recipe, visiting the library, calling someone, working on a puzzle, or starting a small creative project.

The alternative should be accessible. A complicated plan will struggle to compete with a shopping app that opens in seconds.

Positive Emotions Can Trigger Spending Too

Emotional spending is not limited to sadness or stress. Excitement, pride, relief, and celebration can also weaken financial boundaries.

You receive good news and decide to upgrade the celebration. You finish a difficult project and reward yourself with a purchase. You receive a bonus and begin spending before deciding how the money should support your larger goals.

Positive emotions can create a sense that normal limits no longer apply. The purchase feels justified because something good happened.

Celebration deserves a place in life, but it works better when the amount is chosen before excitement takes over. Keep a list of rewards at different price levels or maintain a celebration category in your budget.

This allows you to mark important moments without turning every success into a financial setback.

Guilt Can Strengthen the Cycle

The emotional spending cycle often continues after the purchase. Relief may be followed by guilt, embarrassment, or fear about the account balance.

Those feelings can create another need for comfort. If shopping is already a familiar coping method, the person may spend again to escape the regret caused by earlier spending.

Harsh self criticism usually makes this cycle harder to interrupt. Shame encourages secrecy and avoidance, while curiosity makes the pattern easier to examine.

Instead of asking, “Why am I so bad with money?” ask what happened before the purchase, what relief it provided, and what the full result was afterward. This language separates the behavior from your identity.

You are not excusing the purchase. You are collecting the information required to respond differently.

Track Feelings Alongside Transactions

A bank statement shows the amount, date, and merchant, but it does not record your emotional state. Adding that context can reveal patterns that financial categories miss.

For several weeks, record unplanned purchases along with the time, location, and feeling that appeared before them. Also note what happened immediately afterward and how you felt the next day.

You may notice that spending increases after difficult meetings, during lonely weekends, or late at night. Perhaps certain social media accounts trigger purchases, or visiting particular stores leads to spending beyond the original plan.

Patterns make prevention more specific. Instead of trying to use more willpower everywhere, you can focus on the times and situations where emotional spending is most likely.

A Waiting Period Creates Emotional Distance

Strong emotions create urgency. A purchase can feel necessary now even when waiting would cause no real harm.

Create a waiting period for optional spending. A smaller purchase might wait until the next day, while a larger one may require several days or weeks.

During the waiting period, avoid repeatedly visiting the product page. Continued browsing can keep the emotional excitement active and make the delay feel like an extended sales process rather than a genuine pause.

When the time passes, ask whether you still want the item and whether the money is available without borrowing or weakening another priority. Some purchases will still make sense, and you can complete them with greater confidence.

Others will lose their emotional force. In those cases, waiting has protected both your money and your future attention.

Add Friction Where Spending Is Too Easy

Online shopping systems are designed to reduce effort. Payment details are saved, products are recommended, and checkout may require only one tap.

Adding small obstacles can restore a moment of choice. Remove stored card information, delete shopping apps, unsubscribe from promotional messages, and log out after using retail websites.

You can also keep desired items on a written list rather than in an active online cart. Review the list during a planned financial check instead of deciding during the original emotional moment.

Friction does not make spending impossible. It gives your slower, more deliberate thinking enough time to participate.

Create a Budget for Pleasure

A financial plan that removes all enjoyable spending can make emotional purchases more likely. Strict denial may work temporarily, but it can also create resentment and a desire to escape the budget.

Set aside a realistic amount for entertainment, hobbies, personal purchases, and spontaneous enjoyment. Spending from this amount should not require guilt or a detailed defense.

The boundary matters because pleasure is easier to manage when it has a legitimate place. You can enjoy something now while still protecting savings, bills, and long term goals.

A fun budget will not solve every emotional trigger, but it prevents the financial plan from treating all pleasure as irresponsible. That makes it easier to distinguish healthy enjoyment from spending used to avoid difficult feelings.

Returns Can Be Part of Repair

An emotional purchase does not need to become permanent simply because it happened. When the item is unused and the return policy allows it, returning it can be a practical form of repair.

Do not treat the return as punishment. Use it as a chance to review the pattern. What feeling influenced the purchase, and what alternative could be prepared for next time?

Also notice whether returns themselves have become part of the cycle. Some people repeatedly buy for the emotional reward while assuming they can send items back later. The inconvenience, missed deadlines, and forgotten packages can still create financial losses.

The purpose is to reduce harm while changing the process that created the purchase.

Compulsive Buying Requires More Support

Emotional spending exists on a wide range. An occasional comfort purchase is different from a persistent pattern involving uncontrollable urges, secrecy, serious debt, or major conflict.

A medical review of compulsive buying describes repeated urges and buying episodes that can lead to significant psychological, social, occupational, and financial problems. It also notes that compulsive buying may occur alongside conditions such as anxiety and depression.

When shopping feels impossible to control or continues despite serious consequences, budgeting tools may not be enough. A qualified mental health professional can help address emotional regulation, compulsive behavior, and related concerns.

Financial counseling may also help organize debts, bills, and repayment options. Seeking support is not an overreaction. It is a practical response when the pattern has grown beyond what simple spending rules can manage.

The Goal Is Not Emotionless Spending

No one makes every purchase through pure logic. Money supports comfort, identity, celebration, connection, creativity, and pleasure. Emotions are naturally part of financial decisions.

The goal is not to remove feeling from spending. It is to notice when a purchase is being asked to do emotional work it cannot complete.

A thoughtful purchase can still bring joy. The difference is that it fits your financial reality and continues to feel worthwhile after the emotional moment passes.

Pause long enough to identify the feeling, consider another response, and review what the purchase will cost beyond today. When spending remains the best choice, make it deliberately. When another action meets the need more directly, allow your money to remain available for something that will matter longer.

Emotional spending matters because emotions matter. Listening to them does not require obeying every urge they produce.

Staff Writer; Lou Jackson

A lot of people hear the phrase “spread your risk” and picture a strategy built around caution, retreat, or playing defense. But that is not really what diversification does. It does not remove uncertainty from life, investing, or even everyday money decisions. What it does is make uncertainty survivable. That distinction matters, because the goal is not to avoid every possible setback. The goal is to keep one bad outcome from knocking over everything else.

This idea shows up in more places than the stock market. It is there when a household keeps some cash on hand, contributes to retirement, and still makes room to pay off debt quickly. It is there when a small business serves more than one type of customer. It is there when a worker builds more than one skill instead of betting a career on a single job title staying valuable forever. In all of these cases, spreading risk is less about fear and more about endurance.

That is why diversification is often misunderstood. People think it is the strategy for people who are scared to commit. In reality, it is often the strategy that lets you commit for longer. If all your hopes depend on one income stream, one investment, one client, or one plan working perfectly, you are not bold. You are fragile. Spreading risk gives you enough stability to keep participating even when one piece of the puzzle disappoints you.

Why Total Safety Is Its Own Kind of Risk

There is a hidden downside to trying to avoid risk altogether. When people chase total safety, they often end up exposed to a different problem: missing growth, flexibility, and opportunity. In investing, this can mean holding everything in one “safe” place and watching inflation quietly shrink what that money can do over time. In career choices, it can mean never trying for a better role because the current one feels predictable. In personal finance, it can mean treating every uncertain decision as dangerous, even when some uncertainty is exactly what helps you move forward.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission explains that diversification and asset allocation are tools meant to balance risk and reward, not eliminate one side of the equation entirely. An investor with a longer time horizon may be more comfortable with volatility because time gives those ups and downs room to even out. That same logic applies outside investing too. Time, flexibility, and multiple options often matter more than finding a perfectly safe path. The SEC’s guide to asset allocation, diversification, and rebalancing makes that tradeoff especially clear.

The point is simple. Refusing all risk does not create certainty. It often creates stagnation. And stagnation can be expensive in ways that are easy to miss until years have passed.

A Better Way to Think About Diversification

Instead of thinking of diversification as a shield, it helps to think of it as a suspension system. A car still hits bumps in the road. The suspension just helps absorb the impact so the whole vehicle does not shake apart. Diversification works the same way. Losses still happen. Disruptions still happen. Markets fall. Jobs change. Plans go sideways. But a diversified approach helps any single shock do less damage.

That is exactly why financial educators keep stressing that diversification works across and within categories. FINRA notes that putting all your money into one asset class, or even one security inside that class, creates concentration risk. In other words, you are not really protected just because you made a choice that sounded responsible on the surface. Real protection comes from variety that responds differently to the same event. FINRA’s explanation of asset allocation and diversification breaks this down in a practical way.

This is a useful mindset shift because it moves the conversation away from “How do I avoid every loss?” and toward “How do I avoid being ruined by one loss?” Those are completely different questions. The first one usually leads to paralysis. The second one leads to planning.

Spreading Risk in Real Life, Not Just on Paper

Most people already diversify in ways they do not label that way. A family might keep one partner in a steadier job while the other pursues a business idea. A freelancer may work with several clients so one cancellation does not crush the month. A homeowner may build an emergency fund while also making progress on debt. None of this is glamorous, but it is smart.

The less obvious truth is that diversification often feels boring when it is working. You do not get the thrill of being completely right all at once. You do not get the dramatic story of betting big on one thing and winning fast. What you get instead is resilience. You get room to recover. You get the ability to make your next decision from a position of strength instead of panic.

That can be emotionally frustrating, especially in a culture that celebrates huge swings and instant payoffs. But long term financial health usually has more to do with staying functional than looking impressive. People who can absorb setbacks tend to keep moving. People who cannot absorb setbacks are often forced into reactive choices that make the original problem worse.

What Diversification Really Protects

At its core, diversification protects your ability to continue. That may sound less exciting than protecting returns, but it is arguably more important. A person who stays invested, keeps earning, keeps learning, and keeps adjusting has a far better chance of reaching long term goals than someone who makes one extreme bet and has no margin for error.

This is true with money, but it is also true with attention and energy. If every part of your life is stretched to the limit, one surprise expense or one professional setback can drain everything at once. Spreading risk can mean leaving space in your budget, your schedule, and your expectations. It can mean not relying on a single outcome to validate your whole plan.

That is why the healthiest approach to risk is not denial. It is design. You assume that setbacks will happen at some point, then build a structure that can take a hit without collapsing.

The Goal Is Participation, Not Perfection

The most useful lesson here is that risk is not the enemy. Unmanaged concentration is. When all your resources, plans, or hopes are tied to one outcome, even a small disruption can feel catastrophic. But when risk is spread thoughtfully, uncertainty becomes something you can work with instead of something that controls you.

So no, spreading risk does not mean avoiding risk. It means accepting that risk is part of progress and refusing to let any single threat have too much power over your future. That is a more grounded, more durable way to think about money, growth, and decision making.

In the end, diversification is not about hiding from possibility. It is about staying in the game long enough to benefit from it.

Staff Writer; Harry Jones

Charles Shearer, who was born into slavery in Virginia, and his wife Henrietta opened Shearer Cottage to African American travelers back in 1912. He understood what a safe bed meant when so few doors would open. Dorothy West lived and wrote there. Spike Lee still vacations in Oak Bluffs and has been known to grab his coffee at Mocha Mott’s. That lineage runs deep, and it built a mythology around the place, a sense that you needed a certain pedigree to belong.

Something has shifted, though. Scroll through your feed in early August now and you will see a different crowd than the one that dominated those old postcards. Younger travelers. First timers. Folks who put a little aside every check, caught the ferry from Woods Hole, and showed up plain curious about the noise. The phone in everybody’s pocket did that. What used to travel by word of mouth among a certain set now lands on the timeline of whoever happens to be scrolling that night. A cousin posts a plate of oxtail near the harbor, a college friend films the sunrise swimmers, and suddenly the destination feels less like a members only club and more like an invitation.

The African American Film Festival deserves a heap of the credit. Stephanie and Floyd Rance have been at this since 2002, and the thing just keeps outgrowing itself. Its 23rd go, back in 2025, ran nine days, screenings stacked right up against real talk, with Jennifer Hudson, Dwyane Wade, Issa Rae, and Tracee Ellis Ross drifting around town. Stephanie Rance aimed that year’s slate at joy instead of struggle. Sounds small on paper. On the ground it plays different. It tells a young cat from Atlanta or Detroit that the island is no museum of somebody else’s success. The place reads closer to a living room with the door propped open.

Ralph Lauren noticed too. The brand rolled out an entire Oak Bluffs collection last year, borrowing from the crisp style you find at Howard homecoming and along Circuit Avenue. Some folks bristled at a giant label profiting off a heritage it did not build. Sheryl Wesley, who runs HBCU Legacy Week on the island, put it plainly. The campaign only illuminated what her community had been doing there for generations. That friction, between honoring a legacy and packaging it, sits at the center of this whole conversation.

So here is the real question. Is the Vineyard evolving from an exclusive retreat into a destination that ordinary working people can actually claim as their own?

I lean toward yes, with eyes open. The gatekeeping was never only about color. Race shaped the Vineyard’s Black history from the beginning, but class eventually mattered too, especially when it came to who could afford a home on that soil and who had the family roots to feel entitled to the sand. What the newer wave brings is a democratization of the dream. You do not have to own a gingerbread cottage to walk Inkwell Beach at dawn with the Polar Bears, that morning swim circle that has met since 1946. A trust fund is not required to sit at Union Chapel on a Sunday or to catch Illumination Night glowing under the Tabernacle.

The food tells that story as well as anything. Winston and Lisa Christie run Winston’s Kitchen down by the harbor, serving jerk chicken and stew beef in portions that respect a working person’s appetite and wallet. Chef Ting cooks the whole diaspora at Black Joy Kitchen over on Oakland Avenue, plating dishes gathered from dozens of countries. Newton Waite keeps the Caribbean flame burning at his counter off Circuit Avenue, and the brown stew chicken there will make you close your eyes. Barack Obama himself once put in an order at Nancy’s on the harbor, and that same counter will serve the schoolteacher from Baltimore standing right behind him. None of these spots require a pedigree. They ask for an appetite and a little patience in line.

Now I would be lying if I claimed the change comes without tension. Longtime homeowners, the families who kept those cottages through lean decades, sometimes watch the August crowds with a wary eye. They remember when the quiet was the whole point. Prices keep climbing, and there is a genuine fear that the very families who made this place sacred could get priced clean out of it. The Cottagers, that historic circle of women who have owned property there across generations, carry that memory. Their worry is legitimate, and I will not wave it off.

Still, culture only stays alive when it breathes new air. A tradition sealed off from the young eventually becomes a headstone. What I see unfolding in the Bluffs looks more like renewal than invasion. The heritage stays put. Our Heritage Trail still marks the grounds where the ancestors labored and rose. Those old stories keep getting passed along the porches. What is shifting is the guest list, and a longer list is not a betrayal of the past. It stands as proof the past meant something.

My hope is that the newcomers arrive as students, not conquerors. Learn the names before you geotag the beach. Understand that the ease you feel walking those streets was paid for by souls who had precious little ease anywhere else. Tip Winston well. Book a table at Chef Ting’s. Sit with a hard film at the festival and let it work on you.

Just this month the festival hit its 24th run, with more than 60 films across nine days and an audience that continues to expand far beyond the island. That growth is the whole point. Nobody built this island to sit behind glass. It has always worked best as a homecoming, plain and simple, a patch of coast where tired folks could set their bags down and breathe as if they had a right to. Have you ever made the trip yourself, stood on that sand at dawn and felt what the fuss is about? If more of us are finding that water now, if a young brother from the South Side or a young sister from Houston can plant their feet there and know they belong, then the mission is working exactly as the elders intended. That door is open wider now than at any point I can recall. Come correct, and the island will keep you the way it kept the ones who got there first.

Staff Writer; Lee Walker

This brother is a fitness trainer with 12 years of experience, focused on building strength, clarity, and real health within the Black community. Through his writing, Mr. Walker hopes to uplift younger Black men and men in general through honest conversations about fitness, financial pressure, fatherhood, discipline, mental wellness, and the importance of brotherhood.

Have questions? Reach me at LeeW@ThyBlackMan.com

This new version might sound unfair until you listen to Rep. Ro Khanna’s (D-Calif.) pitch for an allegedly onetime, 5% wealth tax on California billionaires, tied to November’s vote on Proposition 40.

Space constraints prevent us from surveying all that’s wrong with wealth taxes here. But as a reminder, they raise very little income for the government, are an administrative nightmare, could be unconstitutional and create enormous disincentives to build the kind of wealth that creates jobs and funds government services through other taxes in the first place.

A recent dust-up on X between Khanna and entrepreneurs like Mark Cuban exposes the level of economic ignorance that makes U.S. wealth taxes so tempting to politicians. The issue at hand is implementing California’s version when a founder looks like a billionaire on paper without actually having the cash on hand.

This isn’t an obscure problem, particularly for young founders. Imagine you have a great idea and create a startup. Investors put $1 billion into your startup, and its share price rises to give it a $10 billion valuation. You own 20%, so now you’re worth $2 billion! Except that you don’t have $2 billion.

The investors have put their money into the company, not into your checking account. That capital is for hiring engineers, for building factories or data centers, for developing products and expanding the company. It makes your stake impressive on paper, and yet that could theoretically land you a $100 million tax bill without a dollar in your pocket.

Khanna suggests that the founder could sell shares to pay the tax. But that would effectively force an entrepreneur to give up a large portion of his company because a financing round has placed a high valuation on it before it has fulfilled its potential. Besides, shares in young, private companies are typically far less liquid than Apple shares.

This is where a stupid idea gets even stupider. If the founder can’t or won’t sell, he could — or so says Khanna — borrow against the shares. But what bank lends $100 million against illiquid stock in young companies that may or may not succeed?

Not to worry. Khanna has an answer for that too: The loan can be issued by the government. The founder would pledge shares as collateral, have years to repay, and “the state could sell it if he defaults on the loan.”

So, we’ve gone from taxing the billionaire to lending him money and taking his shares if he can’t repay.

There is a delicious irony to all of this. Wealth-tax advocates complain about wealthy people borrowing against appreciated stock rather than selling the stock and realizing the gains that trigger capital-gains taxes. Yet when their wealth tax creates a liquidity problem, their solution is for billionaires to borrow against appreciated stock, only now from Uncle Sam.

Cuban identified an even deeper problem: The new company doesn’t have to fail for this arrangement to become perverse. A founder could spend the next 10 years building an enormously successful company, creating thousands of jobs and paying millions in taxes, while continuing to reinvest rather than cash out. After a decade, his shares might be worth far more than when the loan was made — and he still might not have $100 million in cash to repay the wealth-tax loan.

The reason is that success and liquidity are not the same thing. In Khanna’s government-loan scenario, the government could sell the shares used as collateral not because the company failed but because the founder kept his wealth tied up in the venture. Under this system, the incentive is to cash out instead of growing the business, hiring more people and creating more corporate tax revenue over the long term.

Cuban’s response was profane but insightful: “This is the biggest f—- you in the history of entrepreneurship.” While Khanna points to founders so rich that this situation might not be much of a problem now, they made their business decisions and took lots of financial risks when they weren’t threatened by a wealth tax.

Before Republicans get too indignant, they should look in the mirror. The Trump administration helped destroy the norm against government ownership of American businesses by taking a nearly 10% stake in Intel and pieces of many other companies, including Trilogy Metals and USA Rare Earth.

When your supposedly simple billionaire-tax plan requires that the government lend money to people who are only billionaires on paper, who then use it to pay taxes back to the government, which potentially then becomes a shareholder in their companies, the answer isn’t one more clever fix. The problem is your billionaire tax.

Written by Veronique de Rugy

Official website; http://twitter.com/veroderugy

Why do I keep underestimating the greediness of Trump Inc.? How many times will they have to prove that there are no limits?

On Monday, in an earnings call, Trump Media & Technology Group reported that it had signed up more than 10 customers in the week since the launch of this new product, Truth API, with customers, according to the Washington Post, paying “generally in the range” of $60,000 to $100,000 per month. “We recognize a modest amount of revenue from these agreements today,” interim CEO Kevin McGurn said in the earnings call, adding that it can “grow into a meaningful, durable” driver of growth.

On Wednesday, two media organizations sued Trump, claiming that the API service is unconstitutional because it gives paying customers privileged access to public, market-moving announcements.

“A president selling priority access to news he himself generates for the benefit of a private company he controls is so blatantly corrupt and unconstitutional that it would have been hard to even fathom just a few years ago,” Seth Stern, chief of advocacy at the Freedom of the Press Foundation, one of the organizations that brought suit, said in a statement.

It is definitely blatantly corrupt. I’m not sure how you turn that into a constitutional violation. It is, at best, a novel legal theory of the First Amendment. The argument that moving markets this way is a securities violation seems to be the stronger one, but no one expects the Trump SEC to investigate Trump, even though multiple Democratic legislators have asked them to. And isn’t that just how corruption works?

Trump uses Truth Social as his primary means of communicating with the world. He moves markets, makes announcements about the war, the economy, the budget and politics. Some days, he posts as often as a hundred times. Early access to those posts has value, or people wouldn’t pay for it.

And who makes money from all this? Trump’s family is the primary shareholder in Trump Media & Technology Group. The president’s stake in the company is worth nearly $1 billion, held in a revocable trust managed by his son Donald Trump Jr.

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Maryland) launched his own investigation into the product, demanding that Trump Media produce records of communication between company executives and government officials related to the plan; information on the Truth Social accounts available through the API and any customers; and revenue projections, pricing, marketing materials and more.

“This White House-Wall Street-Trump Business feedback loop represents the depraved essence of insider trading,” he wrote to interim CEO McGurn, who defends his product as business-as-usual. Maybe so for businesses; not for presidents.

There should be a law against this. Arguably, there is. The aptly named Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act is a 2012 law that prohibits the president, vice president and members of Congress from using nonpublic information learned through their offices for financial gain. But will anyone at the SEC or the Trump Justice Department ever pursue such a case? Of course not. And they will certainly argue against any private right of action.

The rich are different — and Donald Trump more so than anyone. In Yiddish, we call it chutzpah. In English, it’s just plain greed.

Written by Susan Estrich

Kick, mostly. That world came to him through Deen The Great, and before long the partnership turned the chaos surrounding them into a brand. They called themselves the Krash Out Boyz. Sit with that name a second. They put the meltdown right there in the title, sold it as content, and folks lined up to watch.

Here is what troubles me. Every slurred word, every argument, every time the former champ looked lost on camera, somebody clipped it. Chopped it into fifteen seconds, slapped a caption on top, pushed it into the feed. Millions watched. Folks laughed, shared, then waited for the next one like it was a sitcom with a fresh episode every night.

We have a phrase for all this now. Crashing out. The slang grew out of Black communities, with Louisiana playing an important part in its rise, and rappers helped carry it into the wider culture before social media wrung every last drop out of it. Now everybody says it, and far too often they say it about us.

That is the part few people want to touch. The internet has developed a real appetite for watching Black men fall apart in public. Not just Adrien. Think about how many viral moments feature a brother at his lowest, and how quickly the comments fill with laughing faces and popcorn. The unraveling becomes its own genre. Pain turns into product.

I am not naive about his role here. This is no child. Nobody forced him to sit in front of that camera. The drinking, the loud mouth, the public messes, all of it went out on film, and some of it became profitable. There have been financial troubles, a civil lawsuit containing serious allegations, and feuds spilling from livestreams into real life. In early July, he and Deen even had to be separated during a heated confrontation while wearing matching pink hoodies. You cannot excuse everything a person does just because he is struggling.

But the struggle is not speculation. Broner has publicly discussed problems with alcohol, gambling and his mental health. Back in 2016, friends became so concerned by alarming posts on his social media accounts that police were contacted. Years later, in 2022, he withdrew from a scheduled fight with Omar Figueroa Jr. and openly said he needed to take care of his mental health. That is not internet gossip. That is a man telling the world that something inside him needed attention.

So what does the audience do with that? Mostly nothing. Knowing he has struggled does not slow the clip machine down even a little. If anything, it can make the footage more valuable. Famous and coming undone reads as comedy to some people. Famous, broke and coming undone is an even bigger jackpot. Millions earned across a boxing career eventually gave way to very public financial trouble, and too many people treated the empty pockets like a punchline instead of a warning.

Deen deserves a word too. Give the brother his credit for helping pull Broner into a lane that generated income at a time when the big boxing checks were no longer arriving the way they once did. For a while, streaming looked like one of the smartest moves Adrien had made in years. Somebody handed him another way to stay visible, make money and build something outside the ring.

Trouble is, the same setup that gave Broner another income stream also kept cameras rolling through some of his lowest moments, and those moments repeatedly became the clips that traveled farthest. When the relationship between the two men became strained, Deen arranged for another cameraman so Broner could run his own broadcasts. The partnership split publicly. More clips followed. Even the breakup became part of the show.

I keep circling one thing. Underneath the meme is a person. A human being with a mama, with children, with a body that has absorbed thousands of punches and a mind he has openly admitted has struggled. We know this. The receipts have been sitting in front of us for years. We watch anyway, because watching is easy and caring costs something.

Ryan Garcia, of all people, publicly reached out earlier this year and encouraged Broner to stop drinking and get himself together. Fans typed the same thing underneath video after video. Please stop drinking. Get some help. Some meant it. Plenty of those same people turned around and reposted the newest breakdown because the engagement was too good to leave alone. That contradiction lives in everybody who consumes this kind of content. We say we care while our thumbs hit share.

I came up in a time when a brother falling apart got handled quietly. Family stepped in. The church folks came by. Somebody sat with you. It was not entertainment, and it sure was not a revenue stream. I am not romanticizing those days, because plenty of hurt got buried that should have been spoken about openly. But we have swung so far in the other direction that a person’s collapse can now play out before an audience of strangers who treat every ugly moment like another episode.

And here is where the story gets more interesting. Broner is trying to change the ending. This summer he and Deen launched a 45 day streaming challenge built around sobriety, training, losing weight and preparing for another possible boxing run. Broner has been talking about staying sober, getting his body back and returning to the ring. People inside boxing, including Claressa Shields, have encouraged the effort. Maybe the real test for the audience is what happens now. We were willing to watch every stumble. Are we willing to pay the same attention when the man is trying to stand back up?

Maybe the honest question is no longer simply what is wrong with Adrien. We know a good deal about what has troubled him because he has told us himself. The harder question aims at the rest of us, the ones scrolling, laughing and waiting for tomorrow’s clip. What does it say about us if a Black man’s breakdown earns more attention than his attempt to rebuild?

There is no clean answer here. Broner still has responsibility for what he says, what he does and what he puts in front of a camera. Grace does not mean pretending bad decisions never happened. But accountability and compassion are not enemies. A man can answer for his choices without becoming public property at his lowest moment.

The better story now is not whether Adrien Broner can give the internet another crash out clip. It is whether he can stay sober, keep training, regain some discipline and build something healthier than the spectacle that surrounded him. Maybe he fights again. Maybe boxing never looks the way it once did. Either way, the man was never a punchline.

Give him some grace. Or at least give his recovery as much attention as you gave his collapse. That much ought to be fair.

Staff Writer; Lee Walker

This brother is a fitness trainer with 12 years of experience, focused on building strength, clarity, and real health within the Black community. Through his writing, Mr. Walker hopes to uplift younger Black men and men in general through honest conversations about fitness, financial pressure, fatherhood, discipline, mental wellness, and the importance of brotherhood.

Have questions? Reach me at LeeW@ThyBlackMan.com.