Comments on: Devout Christians: An Analysis Of The Sons of God – Part 1 of 3. https://thyblackman.com/2023/08/31/devout-christians-an-analysis-of-the-sons-of-god-part-1-of-3/ Black News 24/7 Online for the Black Community. Thu, 18 Jul 2024 14:47:38 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: J Andrew Belk https://thyblackman.com/2023/08/31/devout-christians-an-analysis-of-the-sons-of-god-part-1-of-3/comment-page-1/#comment-588605 Thu, 18 Jul 2024 14:47:38 +0000 https://thyblackman.com/?p=113333#comment-588605 Make sure that you are born again before attempting to interpret the spiritual things of the Tanakh and the Brit Chadasha. Natural depraved human understanding is finite and “cannot” comprehend nor fathom the infinite in Ayer Asher Ayer.

]]> By: John e La Madrid https://thyblackman.com/2023/08/31/devout-christians-an-analysis-of-the-sons-of-god-part-1-of-3/comment-page-1/#comment-576934 Thu, 13 Jun 2024 21:37:22 +0000 https://thyblackman.com/?p=113333#comment-576934 The Word does NOT say angels have No Reproductive part…that’s conjecture on your part Mr. Herman Cummings…it says they are neither male or female…

Possibly Hermaphrodites???

Angels don’t have sex or marry in heavenly…Remember these are the GOOD Angels that obeyed God…
Maybe the bad angels were made bad by their bad choice to have sex???

Maybe a vow of Chastity or and Old Testament Eunuck???

The Tanakh (Old Testament) use of the term Sons’ of GOD, Genesis 6:2; 6:4; Job 1:6; 1:6-12; 2:1; 38:7 as ANGELS! Subjective B.I.A.S. seems to force Conjecture to make your point, maybe to protect a human tradition (doctrine)…

It’s OK to say we really don’t have answers to all the Bible Bumps and seemingly contradictions…

]]> By: John Wheeler https://thyblackman.com/2023/08/31/devout-christians-an-analysis-of-the-sons-of-god-part-1-of-3/comment-page-1/#comment-557534 Sat, 23 Mar 2024 17:35:39 +0000 https://thyblackman.com/?p=113333#comment-557534 The sons of God are the sons of Adam and not Angelic beings.

]]> By: John Wheeler https://thyblackman.com/2023/08/31/devout-christians-an-analysis-of-the-sons-of-god-part-1-of-3/comment-page-1/#comment-557533 Sat, 23 Mar 2024 17:32:43 +0000 https://thyblackman.com/?p=113333#comment-557533 Anyone ever considered that the sons of God could be the sons of Adam who are sons of God. So you have the sons of God cohabitating with the sons of the Gentiles. Adam the son of God, Seth the son of God, etc.

]]> By: karl x neff https://thyblackman.com/2023/08/31/devout-christians-an-analysis-of-the-sons-of-god-part-1-of-3/comment-page-1/#comment-556176 Mon, 18 Mar 2024 23:04:53 +0000 https://thyblackman.com/?p=113333#comment-556176 i dont think thy black man can be trusted to tell the whole truth of any thing he says He does nothing but confuse me..

]]> By: Herman Cummings https://thyblackman.com/2023/08/31/devout-christians-an-analysis-of-the-sons-of-god-part-1-of-3/comment-page-1/#comment-555098 Thu, 14 Mar 2024 16:51:27 +0000 https://thyblackman.com/?p=113333#comment-555098 In reply to Richard W Griffin.

Angels do not have reproductive organs, and are neither male nor female (Matthew 22:30). The five previous advents of mankind come from the correct rendition of Genesis chapter one. Each day was taken from a different week, and each week was the beginning of seven different time periods. That is why the sequence of events is different in chapter two, than it is in chapter one concerning the animals and mankind.

The man Job was not from our time period.

]]> By: Richard W Griffin https://thyblackman.com/2023/08/31/devout-christians-an-analysis-of-the-sons-of-god-part-1-of-3/comment-page-1/#comment-554928 Wed, 13 Mar 2024 15:36:00 +0000 https://thyblackman.com/?p=113333#comment-554928 “Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them.” Job 1:6 The same Hebrew word used in Genesis is used in Job and definitely is used concerning heaven angelic beings. I guess you could use a comparison of the Sept and compare with Greek usage in the NT to Now are we the sons of God. You need to take all the passages that deal with that Hebrew term to do a good analysis.

Also there are many NT passages that seem to indicate that “And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.” Jude 1:6 & For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment; II Peter 2:4 These seem to indicate that something went on that got God a little peeved and He took some out of circulation for a great evil. Procreating/ co-habitating with human women?

Is this where we get tales of Hercules and the mention of Giants in Gen 6? Good analysis would require some response. Not sure where you are getting all these Advents of mankind. God created once. Even the book of Job seems to speak of a relic of the dinosaur age living in the Jordan valley after the flood. Human footprints inside dinosaur prints are to be found in the western US. The Long War Against God: The History and Impact of the Creation/Evolution Conflict Henry M. Morris is a helpful book.

]]> By: Pelvo White, Jr. https://thyblackman.com/2023/08/31/devout-christians-an-analysis-of-the-sons-of-god-part-1-of-3/comment-page-1/#comment-497064 Thu, 31 Aug 2023 13:56:10 +0000 https://thyblackman.com/?p=113333#comment-497064 It is true that empirical science has nothing to do with the Christian religions because it is based on faith and not upon discoveries that have proceeded from hypothesis, to theory, to law ( i.e.Empirical Science, the science of sense impressions ). Mixing scientific words such as ” analysis,data,and theory”, which are not religious words,do not apply in a religious discussion, however there are other statements that you have made in this article that I have found are true.You said ” Be advised that there are unknown realities, both in the Earth, and in the scriptures.” This is true.You said “Angels do not have reproduction organs, and are neither male, nor female.This is partially true,( i.e. Angels are often not regaled with reproductive organs in this that angels can appear to look like both men ( i.e. Latin angelicus, et angelica ) and women, but what is a distinguishing factor among angels is their knowledge of human beings is superior to that of human being knowledge of themselves( i.e. angels can lead men and women around as if they are cattle with rings in their noses ), and when human beings make amorous advancements towards angels, those advancements are not passionately reciprocated by angels.

]]>