1. It was passed and applied ex-post facto, in violation of the United States Constitution.

2. The registry claims to be a civil law, but has no civil outcomes. A civil outcome is defined as an objective calculation of less recidivism resulting from the regulation. There is no evidence the registry decreases recidivism

3. The government forces registration and publicizes the information and encourages the public to isolate because those on a registry are considered or expressly implied to be dangerous. However, no court has ever ruled that dangerousness was a requirement to be listed.

4. The loss of safety and/or security. An offender who cannot find housing, employment, or healthy social relationships is never safe for any community. These are well documented outcomes to a registry given to the public in unlimited ways.

5. No DUE PROCESS. The State has determined through a catch-all standard of review that the registry law is legal if it is rational (rational basis test). This “flat earth” view assumes a law is rational as long as you don’t know any better. The law seems rational to the layman, but totally irrational to those who have relevant education and experience.

6. DUE PROCESS. Due process has been denied in any registry law because supposedly no registry law impacts “protected Constitutional rights”. It is ridiculous on its face to place comprehensive police state around an individual, for life under a presumption they always are dangerous or potentially dangerous and not allow ANY challenges to any law. To say I have no right to live peaceably, and be a contributing and active member of my community as inherently Constitutional, eviscerate the whole idea of why we have individual rights.

7. No personalized determination of dangerousness. The courts have allowed the government any classification system they desire. The Adam Walsh Act decided that 2/3 of the registry will forever be classified in the highest category. The government changes often who is what category based solely on what a legislature decides that session.

8. Does a person have to follow, “public safety” laws that only take their safety and security?

The answer is an emphatic, NO. and the more prison you add for not following your illegal laws LESSENS, the credibility of your laws.

Sorry about your registry. I will not follow again. It is dangerous and that is an objective fact, backed by actual evidence.