Comments on: An Unconscionable Hatred; Why Some Sistas Have Chosen To Attack Black Girls Instead Of Nasty R. Kelly.

By: Anne Roberts

Anne Roberts — Tue, 24 Mar 2020 20:24:41 +0000

There are no studies that justify the things R. Kelly has done. Far beyond targeting girls who were not at the age to legally consent, he has also engaged in sadistic, abusive behavior. Someone who is facing so many federal and state charges is not someone who was set up or otherwise victimized. He didn´t learn his lesson from being acquitted back in 2008, but continued his deviant
behavior. I am only glad that times are changing and that rape victims are being truly heard. That is doubly true for black girls whom this society devalues. Protecting predators just because they are black is not pro-black, and deflecting to white predators–whose victims are almost always white–is a cop out.

By: Pelvo White, Jr.

Pelvo White, Jr. — Tue, 19 Feb 2019 16:07:39 +0000

My studies in anthropology have taught me that human male ( men attracted to women ),female ( women attracted only to men ), and mixtures of sexual attractions in between, or attractions to both sexes at the same time, et al, have what I call innate “catch material” meaning physical sexual appeals that can be sensed, and desired by other male,female,sexes in between,both sexes at the same time, et al. R. Kelly obviously has ” catch material ” . Which attracts some of all sexual preferences, and ages to him. This ” catch material ” also includes his money. Some animals and insects attract by color,sounds,smell,et al. It is doubtful that sexual behaviors by human beings can be regulated either by law,or religious fiat. In short, they will do what they want to do despite law and religion.I suspect that R.Kelly isn’t, nor will he be the last person who attracts young girls to himself whether it be by the senses of sight, sound,taste, touch, smell,or either his money,or a combination of all six.Humans are also animals whose mating habits haven’t been clearly defined or documented. There is enough ambiguous documentation in Western World history to suggest that neither the law, nor religious documents clearly define permissible sexual behaviors between underage ( African American males once had wives as young as thirteen with their parents’ consent ) girls, and grown men. R. Kelly could be displaying sights,sounds,taste,touches,smells, and money that some underage girls find attractive, and animalistically magnetic.

By: Anne

Anne — Sun, 17 Feb 2019 00:34:05 +0000

These were underage girls, NOT women. I keep wondering what part of that his defenders either don’t understand or refuse to understand. He intentionally sought out underage girls at schools, in restaurants, and other places, with the assistance of others who knew what he was doing was wrong. There were definitely parents who presented their underage daughters to him in spite of his well-deserved reputation as a predator. Besides, even being the age of consent doesn’t automatically confer maturity, which this grown man knows quite well. He picks underage girls or young women with low self-esteem that he can easily manipulate and control. As for the women who attack these girls, they would rather be entertained by the filth they call his music than to see these girls as the children they are and the need to protect them. In that respect, they mirror the larger society’s disregard for black girls and women. At the end of the day, R. Kelly’s enablers need to face some accountability, but he is ultimately responsible for causing so much pain to so many girls and young women. He was molested as a child himself, and he has morphed into a sadistic abuser of young women, sexually, emotionally, and physically. He is unrepentant, so he needs to face some harsh accountability, preferably behind bars.

By: Trevo Craw

Trevo Craw — Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:41:43 +0000

Some of these “women” knew exactly what they were getting into and R. Kelly just flipped the script on them as did Cosby in many cases. All of a sudden a start struck groupie gold digger (in some cases) becomes a so-called victim and we are supposed to feel sorry for her?

The gullibility of those with their own “get mine” agendas is an approach that often comes back on them.

R. Kelly is trash but so are many of the rappers that many of you support. They objectify women and have no respect for them but you keep buying their CDs and going to their concerts. From Nikki Minaj to Ariana to Rihanna to Snoop, Puff, Jay-Z etc. So some of you who would cry “victim” are exactly why these no good low life “artists” do and get away with what they do.