He got the job as U.S. Supreme Court judge. This was not a criminal trial but to decide if he gets confirmed. You are right that the people who wanted him confirmed didn’t care if he’s innocent or guilty, just as those who didn’t want him confirmed did not care if he’s innocent or guilty.

But people should not support either the Democrats or the Republicans. Juanita Broaddrick says that it doesn’t matter what political party 1 belongs to, that sex abuse is wrong. But Juanita Broaddrick supports President Trump who again has had many women accuse him of sex abuse. Juanita Broaddrick has also supported columnist Dinesh (DJ) D’Souza and Dinesh was accused by his first wife of hitting her during quarrels.

In October 2016, after journalist Megyn M. Kelly mentioned that DJ Trump has had many women accuse him of rape and sex abuse, Juanita Broaddrick got angry and compared Megyn M. Kelly to murderer Charles M. Manson. Paula Rosalee Jones called Megyn a nasty heifer. Juanita Broaddrick got angry because journalist Megyn Marie Kelly told Newt that DJ Trump has had women accuse him of rape and sex abuse. Juanita Broaddrick denies being politically motivated but the fact Juanita Broaddrick got so angry @ Megyn, proves that Juanita Broaddrick is influenced by the political party of the accused, though she says otherwise.

Juanita Broaddrick supports Breitbart even after Breitbart hired Milo Hanrahan Yiannopolous and Milo Hanrahan Yiannopolous defends same sex pedophilia. Perhaps, Juanita Broaddrick thinks it’s acceptable for Milo Hanrahan Yiannopolous to support homosexual pedophilia.

Incidentally, here are things which media has not covered regarding Orlando June 2016. In June 2016, Pastor Roger O. Jimenez (Sacramento) and Pastor Steven Lee Anderson (Tempe) called the 50 Orlando Pulse shooting victims and the others wounded pedophiles. It turns out that on that night, there were underaged teenagers in the pub, so there were individual homosexual pedophiles seeking victims, before the shooting. Now it wasn’t Omar S. Mateen’s place to be executioner. It was the police’s job to arrest, with jury trials and courts deciding punishment. But there were pedophiles that night in the Orlando Pulse before shooting.

With Orlando Pulse, Luis Javier Ruiz, 1 of the homosexual men who survived has AIDS as a result of promiscuity, alcohol and drugs. Orlando Pulse had drug junkies & drug dealers there that night before the shooting and homosexual Luis Javier Ruiz is an AIDS infected drug junky who survived the June 2016 Orlando Pulse shooting. It’s possible that Luis Javier Ruiz is still using drugs because drug junkies often have relapses.

People who call themselves Republican conservatives should be called compromisers because they compromise on topics such as homosexual pedophilia. It is rumored that Ohio Representative JD Jordan covered up or was negligent with regard to homosexual pedophiles abusing teenage wrestlers during the 1990s. Sometimes rumors are true. The right thing to do is investigate the rumor and see if proof verifies or debunks this. Peter J. LaBarbera says that he is against transexual mutilations and he says that he is against homosexual pedophiles, yet Peter J. LaBarbera, Juanita Broaddrick, Mark R. Levin, Laurann Ingraham & Michelle Malkin and Mission America’s Linda P. Harvey are making excuses for Ohio Representative Jim D. Jordan accused of covering up homosexual pedophilia against teenage wrestlers.

Peter J. LaBarbera (Americans for Truth), Juanita Broaddrick, Mark R. Levin, Mission America’s Linda P. Harvey, Michelle Malkin and Fox News Laurann Ingraham took sides with JD Jordan because JD Jordan is Republican & not care about the teenage wrestlers who were abused by homosexual pedophiles. If the rumor is true that Ohio Representative James Daniel Jordan covered up for homosexual pedophilia in wrestling & given how Peter J. LaBarbera (Americans for Truth), Juanita Broaddrick, Mark R. Levin, Mission America’s Linda P. Harvey, Michelle Malkin and Fox News Laurann Ingraham support JD Jordan because he is going after Peter P. Strzok, then perhaps Peter J. LaBarbera (Americans for Truth), Juanita Broaddrick, Mark R. Levin, Mission America’s Linda P. Harvey, Michelle Malkin and Fox News Laurann Ingraham think covering up for homosexual pedophilia is fine when it’s Republican.

1 thing people bring up is that 1 of the wrestlers who is now an adult once emailed a photo of a murderer to the victim’s widow. Yes, the wrestler has turned out to be a horrible adult. The fact that 1 of the wrestlers has turned out to be a bad adult has no relevance to investigating-was Jim Daniel Jordan negligent and or did Jim Daniel Jordan cover up homosexual sex abuse of teenage wrestlers?

Peter J. LaBarbera has in past made excuses for transexual homosexual pedophile David Arthur by saying that David Arthur changed. Mrs. Linda P. Harvey of Mission America has become a disappointment and Mission America’s Linda P. Harvey has also made excuses for transexual homosexual pedophile by having him on her show, which is why people should no longer support Mission America, they say they’re against homosexual pedophiles and then make excuses for David Arthur.

Everything in life is not always about partisanship politics. Its about American unity whenever, where ever and as often as possible, not division or divisive political games that use the citizens as pawns stuck in the middle of partisan agendas. If you do not see and understand that, you are clearly part of the problem and your efforts to make it about one side or the other is what is dividing America.

Your tone is partisan, negative and unproductive. Your arguments are angry and not based in fact but rather bias which keeps you in denial of the facts. Your lack of understanding of Juris Prudence, standards of proof and rules of evidence only makes your comments that much more inaccurate. And while you have a right to your opinion, read and know the facts before you try to refute them.

If you read more carefully instead of reading with a bias in attack mode, you will hear my qualifiers and how I preface what I say. You should not assume that anybody who looks at the facts without a partisan bias like yours must be a democrat. And a matter of fact, a great many conservatives and Republicans disagree with Trump and with Kavanaugh as a Supreme Court Judge.

I suggest further that you read my other article on getting rid of both political parties in order to really get things done. Neither life nor unity are all about partisanship. And your tone and attitude in your comments proves my points without you even realizing that you did.

The FBI obviously missed a lot obviously and if you think they are infallible, you are lost. Further the extent of their investigations was directed by a biased White House who wanted Kavanaugh confirmed. Wake up.
Almost all of your points are wrong.
I am not a democrat so your #10 is wrong too, just like the entire bogus argument you are trying to make. Don’t assume what you don’t know.
Facts are not talking points. Unlike the parrot mindset you are displaying. in a court you would lose and badly.

You are trying to sound like you have a solid argument but you just have an inaccurate, biased angry argument full of assumptions, repeated talking points like a parrot and misunderstandings about corroboration. Better luck next time.

Try becoming a detective as I was or receiving legal analyst training, esp on the rules of evidence, as i did. Until then, your opinions are just bias and angry noise.

Your conclusions are inaccurate and they are thus not fact.

First corroboration does not mean eye witness testimony.
Corroboration is broader than that and there are 6 people who could corroborate but the FBI did not interview any of them. you misunderstand what corroboration is in the broader sense.

As for one of the other accusers, she supplied 20 names of people who she said could corroborate the accusations and again the FBI did not speak to any of them. So we don’t know that there was no corroboration. You are wrong again. Stop listening to, believing and repeating inaccurate and incomplete partisan talking points.

As for criticizing Ford, again you don’t know what you are talking about. I have done trauma counseling and any psychologist, trained counselor or therapist will tell you it is quite common not to remember certain details. Again stop with the talking points.

I am not going to waste time answering every point you made because your entire rationale is inaccurate and the premises you base your points on are inaccurate as well.

Try again and I suggest you read the article more carefully. As a former detective I know alot more about what I am saying and the facts than you do. Your bias is showing.

10: I don’t believe you. Your talking point use all the same arguments that democrat use and make the same mistakes, jumping from ‘well this isn’t a trial’ to condone being the worst kind of person you can be, to implying that anyone who doesn’t believe Ford on accusation alone is somehow a woman hater.

This is why decent people are pissed, you don’t care about Ford, you just care about democrats getting rid of Kavanagh because politics, and you think everyone is stupid enough to fall for ‘I’m not a democrat leftist, but here’s all their points and why you should believe them’. You are not smart, you do what all self important leftists do and slap people in the face over and over, then are surprised when people get sick of it and slap you back.