If you say there is no evidence against Brett Kavanaugh, one of the following exists: Either you are not asking the right questions such as “evidence of what”. Or you have formed your opinion regardless of the evidence because you want Kavanaugh whether he did it or not. Or you have seen and heard the evidence and you have chosen to ignore it. Any and all of these have tainted your ability to evaluate Judge Kavanaugh based on the facts, not partisanship and Trump brainwashing. Especially when Trump just said at a rally that he does not even know Kavanaugh and just met him a few weeks ago..

Partisan Games On Both Sides

How late the committee got the accusations is irrelevant because both parties have played that game. The Republicans gave the Democrats thousands of documents on Kavanaugh to review only a few days before the initial hearings began. Clearly not giving the Democrats enough time to review the documents. Then the republicans flipped the narrative and complained about receiving short notice themselves.

How long Ford and the other victims waited is not relevant either. Why not? Because statistically the long wait is common. And the fact that she did not remember geographic details does not mean it did not happen nor that it did. So that is a mute point. She did remember what happen and who did it. Any other approach towards this is partisan character assassination pure and simple.

To the issue of “evidence to prove what”, we need to realize there are 3 different questions.

First, did Kavanaugh sexually assault any of the 3 victims?

The 4 people named by Ford did not say it did not happen. They said they neither remembered nor recalled it happening. That is not the same thing and their words were chosen carefully. Regarding the third alleged victim of Kavanaugh, she was interviewed briefly by the FBI but they refused to interview 20 witnesses she said who would be able to corroborate her accusation. To be fair to all parties, the FBI should have been allowed to do what they do and follow leads as they found them. Trump initially said that would happen but then changed it.

Second, did Kavanaugh lie to the senate under oath (perjury)?

It can be proven that Kavanaugh lied while under oath about his previous character and behavior. It can also be proven that Kavanaugh lied about others thing unrelated to Ford.

That is a crime, shows his character and should not be ignored. He also initially misrepresented his image as a youth as a boy scout of sorts. That was also not true at all. Don’t fall for the misdirection. It is not about beer. it is about lying under oath, the very thing that got Bill Clinton impeached. Any well trained psychologist, speech communications specialist or profiler can tell that Kavanaugh is lying.

Third, is there evidence to show Kavanaugh’s behavior was aggressive and his blackouts did happen?

That is called a “propensity” toward such behavior. And yes, from the women who made the allegations to people who drank with Kavanaugh to his roommates in college to his own yearbook and letters he wrote, to the bar fight while drunk, there is proof about the drunk behavior and character of Brett Kavanaugh while in high school and college. His roommate and one female college drinking buddy have both stated in interviews that Kavanaugh drank to the point of having blackouts, even though Kavanaugh said that was not true in the Senate hearing.

The Background Investigations

Regarding the final investigation, it was controlled by the Senate Judiciary committee which is not the norm. It can be slanted whenever any partisan white house controls the cope in the first place. And it was not comprehensive when all potential witnesses who could deny or corroborate Ford or Kavanaugh’s testimony were NOT interviewed. And the big question I how did the FBI miss all this in what everybody wants to call such an intensive background investigation? Or were they given a scope by the white house that caused the FBI to overlook this initially or look the other way?

Partisan politics aside, both sides, be fair and look at all of the facts. This is a job interview and nobody shrouded in such controversy, lies, accusations and deception would get a key job in law enforcement or corporate America. The Supreme Court lifetime appointment is even more critical and the bar should be higher. There are hidden agendas on both sides.