Global warming discussions on pollution must be thought of the same way as tobacco. It’s better to not have pollution, incl. greenhouse gas pollution. It’s possible that even w/o greenhouse gas pollution, that global warming would still happen, because earth’s temperatures would change. But cleaning pollution is a good idea. I think greenhouse gas pollution adds to global warming, but it’s possible that global warming would still happen regardless.

To reduce greenhouse gas emissions, I support nuclear/atomic energy & I also support geothermal, hydroelectric dams. We should go with the Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors and also we should use Small Modular Nuclear Reactors (SMR). http://environmentalprogress.org/ is a good environmental organization which supports atomic/nuclear energy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. American Lung Association supports nuclear/atomic energy and it was President Dwight David Eisenhower who had the atoms for peace idea. The 3 energy sources which reduce greenhouse emissions and benefit the environment are nuclear/atomic energy, hydroelectric dams and geothermal.

I support nuclear/atomic energy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. We must use Small Modular nuclear reactors (SMR) and we must use Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor. I also support hydroelectric dams and geothermal. American Lung Association supports nuclear/atomic energy since that gives cleaner air and benefits asthmatics. Professor Steven Arthur Pinker supports atomic/nuclear energy. There are wildlife experts who support nuclear/atomic energy.

Windmills and solar panels, are not green. They need more land, use more materials, generate less energy-both the wind and sun are intermittent. Windmills have killed endangered birds and bats. People who live near windmills have higher incidence of hearing loss, migraines, nausea, etc. Solar panels have dangerous chemicals some of which are carcinogenic. They have also found that solar panels in California have harmed the endangered Mohave desert tortois see http://environmentalprogress.org/big-news/2017/6/21/are-we-headed-for-a-solar-waste-crisis & http://environmentalprogress.org/big-news/2017/6/27/new-study-finds-solar-households-produce-30-to-60-more-electronic-waste-than-non-solar-households