<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: North Korea Nuclear Weapons; To Nuke Or Not?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thyblackman.com/2017/07/28/north-korea-nuclear-weapons-to-nuke-or-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thyblackman.com/2017/07/28/north-korea-nuclear-weapons-to-nuke-or-not/</link>
	<description>Black News 24/7 Online for the Black Community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 11:50:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Josh		</title>
		<link>https://thyblackman.com/2017/07/28/north-korea-nuclear-weapons-to-nuke-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-277287</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 11:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thyblackman.com/?p=69196#comment-277287</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hey, just off the bat (your blog showed up on google news), you call Kim Jong Un a fat, hedonistic hamster twice in the opening of your editorial and though the content seemed compelling at first, I&#039;m not going to risk wasting several minutes reading the whole thing since there is a good chance the rest of it is just fat shaming and mocking the physical appearance of a foreign leader. You may ask &quot;then why comment?&quot;, well simply to give you a suggestion that bashing someone&#039;s appearance repeatedly makes your readers think you are childish and a little stupid. Perhaps in future editorials you may consider stylistic choices and more subtle lambasting. You went to the lowest form of critique right away, twice, in the exact same language both times! It&#039;s easy to mock people&#039;s physical features. It becomes less likely you will say anything intelligent on the topic once you do so repeatedly, and so people tune out before even reading the thesis. I know this comment may seem odd, but seriously take some time to edit before you post in the future.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, just off the bat (your blog showed up on google news), you call Kim Jong Un a fat, hedonistic hamster twice in the opening of your editorial and though the content seemed compelling at first, I&#8217;m not going to risk wasting several minutes reading the whole thing since there is a good chance the rest of it is just fat shaming and mocking the physical appearance of a foreign leader. You may ask &#8220;then why comment?&#8221;, well simply to give you a suggestion that bashing someone&#8217;s appearance repeatedly makes your readers think you are childish and a little stupid. Perhaps in future editorials you may consider stylistic choices and more subtle lambasting. You went to the lowest form of critique right away, twice, in the exact same language both times! It&#8217;s easy to mock people&#8217;s physical features. It becomes less likely you will say anything intelligent on the topic once you do so repeatedly, and so people tune out before even reading the thesis. I know this comment may seem odd, but seriously take some time to edit before you post in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alex		</title>
		<link>https://thyblackman.com/2017/07/28/north-korea-nuclear-weapons-to-nuke-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-277286</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 10:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thyblackman.com/?p=69196#comment-277286</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reference to paragraph 6, I believe the North and South are actually technically still at war. The Korean War ended with a ceasefire and not a declaration of peace. I&#039;m not sure how this translates to the US, but given the South is a US ally, I&#039;m assuming the US is also technically still at war as well.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reference to paragraph 6, I believe the North and South are actually technically still at war. The Korean War ended with a ceasefire and not a declaration of peace. I&#8217;m not sure how this translates to the US, but given the South is a US ally, I&#8217;m assuming the US is also technically still at war as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
