Comments on: Ron Paul, Where is the SC love?

By: Kelly

Kelly — Mon, 23 Jan 2012 07:34:27 +0000

I dismissed Ron Paul at first because of racist rumors. Now, after much research, his voting and beliefs don’t match up with racism. Seeing his interviews with Fox news made me wonder what is going on because they asked such stupid questions, didn’t give attention to his plans, and it seemed like a set up? All of this has made me more curious.

By: Grekko

Grekko — Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:36:11 +0000

The love is there, but the Establishment will never admit to it. They can’t! It would be the end of their rule over the sheep. If RP had 4 years in the bully-pulpit in DC, he would educate the majority of this country. There would be no going back. Imagine a critical thinking majority! What a change.

By: Louis Nardozi

Louis Nardozi — Sat, 21 Jan 2012 04:40:46 +0000

Democrats are utterly terrified Obama will have to run against Paul in the general election. Let’s face it, those other three guys ARE Obama, with a little tinkering around the edges.

The only problem Paul has is marginalization and constant media attacks. This is perfectly understandable because papers and tv stations aren’t owned by some guy now – they’re owned by 6 giant corporations that control over 90% of the airwaves and big chunks of the internet. Look at the comments on any story – you’ll see the Paul support there.

What if this is the last chance you’ll have to prevent the collapse of the dollar? Our infrastructure can’t function without oil and oil is denominated now in dollars. What happens when people stop accepting them? No oil means no diesel. No diesel means no trucking. No trucking means no FOOD – most supermarkets carry only 3 days’ inventory. Let’s say it only takes a couple months to find a new supply, what do you think will happen in a city with 10 million starving people, people who’ve never gone hungry a day in their lives? Armageddon.

By: Arthur

Arthur — Sat, 21 Jan 2012 01:36:50 +0000

As the media studiously avoids Ron Paul, momentum keeps switching back and forth amongst everyone else as they bandy about “electability,” a wholly imaginary construct. So we see the candidates not just debating each other, but comparing themselves to a theoretical formulation that has little reality. Only Ron Paul has a solid base that media spin cannot affect. As long as he holds onto it, and he surely will, all he has to do is slowly but surely build upon it which is, in fact, what he is doing. All of his opponents are fighting a conventional war using Super PACs, establishment donors and media support while he engages in a sort of asymmetrical warfare. His guerilla tactics, as in so many real world conflicts, may in the end win the day. . .

By: Eliza

Eliza — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:01:42 +0000

Thanks for this article. I think that it is shameful that the MSM has not been reporting that Paul just got 4 South Carolina senators to endorse him today or yesterday. This is a big deal. This is a great site for debunking the skewed media reporting on Paul: http://www.ronpaulmyths.com Thanks for this article! Very refreshing! And I believe the love is where it needs to be, just not in the MSM.

By: Rikki

Rikki — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:29:03 +0000

Very informed, smart article followed by great comments. This has become my ‘go-to’ site for articles on Dr. Paul. I am a 29 year old white woman and this is where I come for my RP fix!

So nice to have somewhere to go with REAL journalism!

By: Ralph Hornsby

Ralph Hornsby — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:23:02 +0000

If Ron Paul were to win in S.C., do you think the evil powers that be would let him? 8 counties in Iowa have still not been counted–and they lean heavily independent and Democrat. In the 2008 New Hampshire primary, votes were stolen from Obama and Paul and given to Hillary Clinton. Rumor has it in the Iowa caucus a few weeks ago, votes were stolen from Perry and given to Santorum–they wanted to make sure Ron Paul was not close with Romney. I don’t know if S.C. is using Diebold voting machines, but that is another big factor in voter fraud in city, state and national elections.

By: fntsmk

fntsmk — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:15:38 +0000

Folks, please visit and pass along: kookyronpaul daht cahm. This not-for-profit pro-paul site with a ‘twist’ has some great videos, articles, and info beneficial to everyone, regardless of their political affiliation. Peace and Ron Paul in 2012. Please feel free to copy and paste this post if you agree.

By: fntsmk

fntsmk — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:14:23 +0000

There are two types of “anti-Paul” groups of people, if you will. One group is the uninformed folks who know nothing of Ron Paul’s positions on the issues
and have simply formed their opinions of the candidates based upon what they read in the newspapers, see on TV, or hear from their Church Pastors.

The other group of Paul-haters is VERY informed on Ron Paul’s positions on the issues. They are the Establishment folks who stand to lose big money because Ron Paul would put an end to their “Public Debt and War for Profit Gravy Train.”

Who doesn’t want to see a President Paul? Let’s see…,

Anyone who owns or is employed by: The Fed, IRS, TSA, EPA, DEA, BATFE, Dept. of Ed., Dept of Energy, Dept of Interior, Dept of Commerce, H&R Block, Quicken Tax Prep, all CPA’s, all Tax Lawyers, all Law Enforcement (narcs)in the War on Drugs, all lobbyists, all regulators, the Big Banks, Wall Street, Mainstream Media, Military Industrial Complex, all Civilian sub-contractors who have guaranteed Gov’t contracts making products for military use, the Pentagon, people on the Gov’t dole, etc.

I’m sure there’s more and it will be an uphill climb for Dr. Paul, but his supporters are fervent, have seen the light, and campaign endlessly for the good Doctor. We shall overcome. Peace and Ron Paul in 2012!

By: ivykid

ivykid — Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:15:30 +0000

Having served in the military service used to be almost a requirement to run for president. Ron Paul is the only veteran still in the race. We just need to keep spreding the word.