Comments on: Dr. Ron Paul Goes To Washington…

By: hoodgirl

hoodgirl — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:41:05 +0000

I guess we can ALL rely on morals to feed our hunger or Newt to rid us of the “Food Stamp” President! As for Ron Paul being ignored, it was he who made the decision to forgo the Don’s debate which is a missed opportunity for Mr. Three Time Presidential Candidate who has occupied Washington since the 1970s to capture the attention of We The People. Perhaps the third time will be a charm for Uncle Ron who is definitely “Not a Mr. Smith”!

By: Oscar

Oscar — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 04:05:06 +0000

Maybe the article should be titled “Washington goes to Ron Paul”!

By: Jacob

Jacob — Mon, 12 Dec 2011 02:02:07 +0000

The establishment effort to ignore Paul is beyond blatant and still frustrating as hell. We the people will continue to fight our battle, we will not give up. Ron Paul is clearly our only choice, our only hope. The thought of any other candidate leading our country further into oblivion is mind numbing. Wake up and join the fight. There is great hope, a new wind is blowing, freedom is about to come back around, this time hang on tight for dear life and maybe we’ll keep it.

By: Arthur

Arthur — Sun, 11 Dec 2011 04:12:04 +0000

Thank you, Charles.

By: charles

charles — Sun, 11 Dec 2011 03:21:11 +0000

Okay Arthur I was a bit harsh on you, sorry about that.

By: 1iberty4all

1iberty4all — Sat, 10 Dec 2011 01:34:44 +0000

Rand Paul worte a book called “The Tea Party Goes to Washington”, which might fit this article better. I agree that Ron paul is the consumate “Mr Smith” but he went to Washington a couple decades ago.

Rand, on the other hand is the newcommer, but he had a “Mr Smith” moment not too long ago. He is questioning John McCain of all people on the Senate floor over Senate Bill 1867. This is the bill that will allow terroists to be detained “indefinately”, but it also adds the ability of the government to detain American citizens indefinatley, and without due process.

Rand Paul was one of only 7 senators to vote against this bill. It has yet to be passed in the House. I know how Ron Paul will vote on this, but it will likely make its way to President Obama’s desk. I hope that he will veto this bill.

By: Russell Kirksey

Russell Kirksey — Fri, 09 Dec 2011 22:05:48 +0000

Here is you “critical insight” DG!! How could any self respecting black man support Barack Obama again? The War On Drugs is a war on our youth as Surgeon General Joycelyn Elders said. Now why is it that the most racist law, next to the Jim Crow laws, is still on the books? That is the joke Charles. So while the few ones that vote based on a free gov. check, vote to enslave us once again. Great Job!!

By: Russell Kirksey

Russell Kirksey — Fri, 09 Dec 2011 21:57:51 +0000

The new bunker and new law on indefinite detention is the Big Governments way of shoring up for the inevitable. When Ron Paul wins the presidential election the Obama is poised to use military force to hold power. The new law is just the means necessary to try to silence those who stand and fight. Just a theory. I hope it doesn’t come to violence for freedom.

By: DG

DG — Fri, 09 Dec 2011 21:04:49 +0000

Ron Paul Cheerleaders –

It was fun for a while, but now every time a post comes up they are like worker ants following the leader without any clear and cogent thoughts on their own.

My emulation of a Ron Paul commenter – “Yeah, that’s right, small government, kill the fed’

Come on. At least add some critical insight and some substantive libertarian theory as opposed to acting like a high school cheerleader swooning over the top jock on the football team!

By: Arthur

Arthur — Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:50:54 +0000

Jas Dal, that is the imagery his campaign evokes, also that of the perennial American favorite, the underdog. . . Charles, I write about a wide array of topics, political and otherwise, and my name always appears on my articles. Put it in the search box at the very top of the page and you will see.