Tuesday, November 20, 2018


Bill O’Reilly The Same As Bill Clinton.

April 24, 2017 by  
Filed under News, Opinion, Politics, Weekly Columns

Like
Like Love Haha Wow Sad Angry
2

(ThyBlackMan.com) Bill O’Reilly may have given his enemies the ammunition to destroy him, for right now at any rate, but the dishonesty of some involved cannot be overstated. I’m not here to proclaim O’Reilly innocent or to defend his actions; he was wrong on any quantifiable level. But the duplicitous hypocrisy and selectively feigned moral insult of those who, I argue, place an “innocuous comment” on the same level as having someone’s clothes ripped off and savaged is beyond the pale.

Having said that, unlike some of Bill O’Reilly’s accusers, I under no circumstances condone powerful men who rape, beat, or force themselves upon women and/or manipulate women into immoral sexual behavior.

I offer women like Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Jones, Kathy Shelton and Kathleen Willey as examples of abused women O’Reilly’s accusers ignore. I offer, for example, Monica Lewinski who was induced by the power of the Oval Office into making a decision that altered her life forever. What man can openly date and/or think about marrying Monica Lewinski without both he and her becoming the brunt of jokes and insults? Porn actresses are treated with more respect than Ms. Lewinski.

This begs an answer to the question, what makes Bill O’Reilly worse than Bill Clinton? Clinton’s physical and emotional abuse of women is unequaled by any man occupying seats of power in modern political history. Add to that Clinton’s arrogant public display of camaraderie with Jeffrey Epstein, the registered sex offender.

The mainstream media point to the number of times Bill O’Reilly was accused and that Fox News settled suits against him as substantiation of his guilt. But let’s ask these same people how many times Clinton gets to ride on Epstein’s private jet called the “Lolita Express,” which is “purportedly” outfitted with a bed so passengers can have sex with the young underage girls Epstein is known for supplying? Apparently, the 26 times that we know of are not enough to incur the wrath and distaste for Clinton from the same people who are disparaging O’Reilly.

Apparently, the adage of “where there’s smoke, there’s fire” only applies to those the left does not like. How many times does Clinton get a pass for traveling without his Secret Service on the flying sex parlor for men who want sex with little girls?

Bill O’Reilly may be a throwback to the days when it was acceptable for lecherous, disrespectful men in authoritative positions to smack a secretary’s rear end, but he is not a Bill Clinton. Nor has O’Reilly been reported associating with the likes of Epstein.

And lest you have forgotten: Epstein spent 13 months in prison and under house arrest for having a team of sexual traffickers who solicited and obtained little girls as young as 12-years-old to sexually satisfy his friends on his estate. His estate is on an island he owns in the U.S. Virgin Islands and is dubbed “Orgy Island.”

This is the person with whom Clinton continues to travel, and yet these so-called defenders of women’s rights and protectors of women in the workplace bow before him.

Bill O’Reilly’s wife had the self-respect to divorce him, but the same women accusing O’Reilly are frequently seen on television praising the Clintons. Where is Hillary’s self-respect in staying with a man who has made her a public laughingstock? But I digress.

Are we to believe that these women are representative of the “strong independent woman” radical feminists love to blather about? Would not a slap in the face and/or a verbal dressing down have put O’Reilly in his place? If they were the strong women we are supposed to believe, why didn’t they put him in his place?

But accusing a person the neo-Leninist left deems a threat to their cause, of sexual harassment, has become an art form for the demonic forces of the left. The diagram for accomplishing this is always the same: Get some woman of questionable moral standards and have them accuse the target of harassment.

Bill O’Reilly should be a lesson to all men, especially those in the political arena. The adulterous leftists use sex to buy and own politicians, and they also use it to destroy those they hate.

That happens because men in these positions forget how the left plays the game. Accusations do not have to be true. There just has to be the appearance of impropriety that can be used to destroy a person.

Not all of Bill O’Reilly’s accusers crying foul are being honest; some are ideologically motivated, while others are losers willing to sell their soul to be painted-faced Kewpie dolls wearing low cut tops and hiked up dresses in front of television cameras. And fortunately for both kinds, there are enough O’Reillys out there for them to use.

Written by Mychal Massie

Official website; http://mychal-massie.com


Comments

5 Responses to “Bill O’Reilly The Same As Bill Clinton.”
  1. Anirban (aka Abner) Bhattacharya says:

    Actually, this will be the last comment I will make on this-it will be a lenghty answer. Before that, I have been predictably called a ‘liberal’ for saying that there are reasonable doubts with regard to Juanita Broaddrick’s accusation, though I didn’t vote for Hillary and have differences with Hillary on some topics. Let me discuss that before ending with Juanita Broaddrick.

    I disagree with Hillary Diane Clinton on her support for transgenders because I think they should abolish sex change mutilations. Democrats such as Ex Senator Hillary Diane Clinton, ex President Obama, Oprah Gail Winfrey and Kamala Devi Harris are wrong to support transgenders. The Republican Party also supports transgenders including Fox News. @least with Hillary, Oprah, Kamala D. Harris, ex President Obama, etc., they are honest about supporting transgenders.

    Those who call themselves ‘conservatives’ will say they’re against this, but then they hire columnists who support transgenders such as Michelle Malkin &, Ann Hart Coulter who both make excuses for transgenderism. It makes no sense for evangelicals to decry the Rainbow Flag, but support Breitbart who hired Milo Yiannopolous & Milo Yiannopolous supports homosexual pedophilia.

    I don’t care much about Lifesite News and World Net Daily, because World Net Daily claims to be against homosexuality and transgenderism, but then they hire 3 columnists who support the transgender agenda such as JF Stossell, Michelle Malkin and Ann Hart Coulter. Makes no sense to condemn Democrats or those liberals and then do the things you say to be against.

    Now to Juanita Broaddrick. Juanita Broaddrick has been dishonest. Juanita Broaddrick talks about how her story has not been covered much by mainstream press, though NBC Dateline interviewed her and broadcasted her interview in February 1999 & she still condemned NBC. CNN, ABC News and CBS News also talked about Juanita Broaddrick’s accusation in February 1999. Juanita Broaddrick has been on Fox News a few times since then. Now while CBS, NBC, ABC and CNN have discussed Juanita Broaddrick much less than Fox News, they have talked about her. Washington Post & other newspapers talked about Juanita Broaddrick’s accusation in February 1999.

    President Clinton has been out of politics since 2001, so repeatedly talking about Juanita Broaddrick’s accusation would be repeating old news. Hillary Diane Clinton was Senator from 2001-2013 and the media discussed many things that she was accused of such as Benghazi and the emails, though it was concluded Hillary Diane Clinton did nothing illegal though she could have been smarter with the emails.

    Juanita Broaddrick condemned Amazon for selling a book about ex President Clinton by J. Patterson, though Amazon, Barnes & Noble, etc. also sells her book and other books hostile to the Clintons. Amazon and Barnes and Noble’s job is to sell books and make money and they sell pro-Clinton books just as they sell hers. Juanita Broaddrick condemned Fox News for advertising J. Patterson’s book about Ex President Clinton, though Fox News has had her many times on her show.

    In October 2016, after journalist Megyn M. Kelly mentioned that DJ Trump has had many women accuse him of rape and sex abuse, Juanita Broaddrick got angry and compared Megyn M. Kelly to murderer Charles M. Manson. Paula Rosalee Jones called Megyn a nasty heifer. Juanita Broaddrick got offended and angry because journalist Megyn Marie Kelly told Newt that DJ Trump has had women accuse him of rape and sex abuse. Juanita Broaddrick denies being politically motivated but the fact Juanita Broaddrick got so angry @ Megyn, proves that Juanita Broaddrick is politically motivated.

    While only Juanita Broaddrick and William Jefferson Clinton know what happened, the fact is that Juanita Broaddrick’s personality is haughty, arrogant and angry. Juanita Broaddrick’s face fits the body language of an arrogant, haughty and angry personality. I don’t think Juanita Broaddrick wants to be interviewed by NBC, CBS or ABC News because what could happen is a confrontation or conflict, given how Juanita compared Megyn to Charles M. Manson.

    Juanita Broaddrick’s actions are also consistent with some1 who is angry that she was rejected. Juanita Broaddrick on her Twitter page has attacked Chelsea Victoria Clinton, and the attacks Juanita Broaddrick makes on Hillary Diane Clinton and Chelsea are also consistent with a person who is angry that she was rejected and she takes her anger on Clinton’s daughter.

    Juanita Broaddrick says things such as it doesn’t matter what political party 1 belongs to, that rape and sex abuse are wrong. But Juanita Broaddrick supports President Trump who again has had a dozen women accuse him of sex abuse & she condemned journalist Megyn M. Kelly for raising this. And Juanita Broaddrick supports columnist Dinesh J. D’Souza and Dinesh was accused by his ex wife of hitting her (assault and battery) during quarrels. Juanita Broaddrick is influenced by the political party of the accused, though she says otherwise.

    Juanita Broaddrick (along with other Clinton accusers) denies being political, when she is interviewed by news sites such as the Hill but Juanita Broaddrick will say something different when on Twitter. Juanita Broaddrick supports Breitbart even after Breitbart hired Milo Yiannopolous and Milo Yiannopolous defends same sex pedophilia. Would be unsurprising if Juanita Broaddrick thinks it’s acceptable for Milo Yiannopolous to support homosexual pedophilia. Juanita Broaddrick is political though she denies it.

  2. Anirban (aka Abner) Bhattacharya says:

    Posting here for first time in almost a year. I have final thoughts on this, because here are things that Mr. Mychal S. Massie didn’t mention in his article-it deals with Juanita Broaddrick. Minister Mychal S. Massie must know that in criminal cases, it’s beyond a reasonable doubt and there are reasonable doubts regarding the rape/sex abuse accusations against ex President William Jefferson Clinton.

    President Donald John Trump has also had a dozen women accuse him of rape, sex abuse and sexual harassment, but President Trump’s supporters give President Trump the doubt benefit. Many Trump supporters also gave Roy Stewart Moore the doubt benefit when he was accused of committing statutory rape on teenage girls during the 1970s-only Roy Stewart Moore and the women who accuse him know what happened.

    But Mr. Mychal S. Massie must know that only ex Pres. William Jefferson Clinton and Juanita Broaddrick know what happened. It’s possible Juanita Broaddrick is telling the truth but it’s also possible that ex President William J. Clinton had an affair with Juanita Broaddrick and Juanita Broaddrick is angry that ex President William J. Clinton rejected her, in that he did not want to continue the relationship with her.

    It’s also possible that nothing sexual happened between Juanita Broaddrick and ex President Clinton in that Juanita Broaddrick could have wanted to have a relationship with William J. Clinton, but he was not interested in her and she has been angry all these years.

    I write those other possibilities, because Juanita Broaddrick’s actions are also consistent with some1 who is angry that she was rejected. Juanita Broaddrick on her Twitter page has attacked Chelsea Victoria Clinton, and the attacks Juanita Broaddrick makes on Hillary Diane Clinton and Chelsea are also consistent with a person who is angry that she was rejected and she takes her anger on Clinton’s daughter. Only Juanita and Bill know what happened.

    Other things . Juanita Broaddrick says that she has been censored, but I have seen many times her accusations discussed, such as the article by Mr. Massie and when it’s unrelated to the case-I have seen posters turn a discussion of a sex abuse case such as was ex cop Holtzclaw innocent and wrongly convicted? into a forum to attack the Clintons and discuss Juanita Broaddrick. I have seen posters do that on Michelle Malkin’s Twitter page and Michelle Malkin has done that herself here and there such as when interviewed by Pat Campbell.

    Juanita Broaddrick says things such as it doesn’t matter what political party 1 belongs to, that rape and sex abuse are wrong. But Juanita Broaddrick supports President Trump who again has had a dozen women accuse him of sex abuse. And Juanita Broaddrick supports columnist Dinesh J. D’Souza and Dinesh was accused by his ex wife of hitting her (assault and battery) during quarrels. Juanita Broaddrick is influenced by the political party of the accused, though she says otherwise.

    Juanita Broaddrick (along with other Clinton accusers) denies being political, but her actions contradict her. Why then are ex President Clinton’s accusers such as Juanita Broaddrick supporting President Trump though there are accusations against him ? Juanita Broaddrick supports Breitbart even after Breitbart hired Milo Yiannopolous and Milo Yiannopolous defends same sex pedophilia. And why does Juanita Broaddrick support columnist DJ D’Souza, though Dinesh’s first wife accused him of hitting her during domestic fights ? Juanita Broaddrick is political though she denies it.

  3. Anirban (aka Abner) Bhattacharya says:

    I sometimes read Breitbart, WND and Lifesite as those websites can raise things which most media omits & they sometimes do a good job whether I agree or differ with their politics. With the Clintons (again I’m not a Clinton fan), it seems that Breitbart, WND and Lifesite are hostile to them regardless.

    WND, Lifesite News, Breitbart and Free Republic have talked many times about accusations that the Clintons murdered people. They have said things such as that Vince Walker Foster’s suicide was not a suicide but a murder which the Clintons committed though different investigations conclude that it was a suicide. If it’s true that the Clintons committed murder, then I want the police to arrest ex Pres. William J. Clinton and Hillary Diane Clinton & send them to prison for rest of life if convicted. I don’t want to just read about murder accusations, I want the cops taking action if it’s true.

    But there’s no proof that the Clintons murdered people. WND, Breitbart, Free Republic and Lifesite News makes these accusations because they’re against the Clintons regardless. While Breitbart, World Net Daily & Lifesite News sometimes do a good job in reporting news which most media omits, there just is no proof that the Clintons committed murder and so many times when some1 who the Clintons knew dies, Breitbart, World Net Daily, Free Republic and Lifesite News try to make it as though the Clintons were behind that though the proof doesn’t support it, because those sites are against the Clintons.

  4. Anirban (aka Abner) Bhattacharya says:

    I’m neither Democrat nor Republican (don’t like either party) & I don’t care about George Soros. Ex Pres. William J. Clinton had affairs with many women who are in 20s and 30s in his life incl. when he was Pres. because a man with a midlife crisis goes after women much younger than him. I don’t believe Kathleen Elizabeth Willey was sexually abused by William J. Clinton because I don’t think he’s interested in a woman who is nearing womenopause or menopause. I’m sure that Pres. William J. Clinton & Hillary Diane Clinton have not had sex for years.

    It’s possible that William J. Clinton sexually harassed Paula, only it depends what happened. If ex Pres. William J. Clinton sexually proposed to Paula R. Jones, Paula told him no after which William J. Clinton ended that, then ex Pres. William J. Clinton did not do anything illegal. Now if William J. Clinton repeatedly proposed to her after she told him no incl. expose himself to her, then it would be indecent exposure and sexual harassment. Only Paula and Bill know what happened.

    I don’t think ex President William J. Clinton was interested in Kathleen Elizabeth Willey because @ 47 years old in 1993, she was too old for most men to want. Pres. William J. Clinton’s defense is that he was not interested in Kathleen E. Willey because Kathleen E. Willey has small breasts and not his type.

    It was Kathleen E. Willey who wanted to have an affair with Pres. William J. Clinton (she pursued him according to witnesses), but Pres. William J. Clinton rejected her. Kathleen E. Willey in 1993 was 47 years old & reaching womenopause or menopause. Ex President William J. Clinton could easily get women who were younger and prettier than Kathleen E. Willey. I don’t think ex President William J. Clinton was interested in Kathleen Elizabeth Willey because @ 47 years old in 1993, she was too old for most men to want. Pres. William J. Clinton’s defense is that he was not interested in Kathleen E. Willey because Kathleen E. Willey has small breasts and not his type.

    Kathleen E. Willey interest is to money-she wrote a book in 2007 accusing ex Pres. William J. Clinton of murdering her husband because I think she wants to profit & when you write a book, your interest is to get rich. Again-Kathleen Elizabeth Willey wrote a book in 2007 (World Net Daily has publicized this) where she accused ex President William J. Clinton of killing Kathleen E. Willey’s husband in 1993. There’s no proof that Pres. William J. Clinton murdered her husband and there’s no proof he murdered any1.

    As Paula Rosalee Jones was born in 1966 and now womenopausal or menopausal, you can be sure that ex President William J. Clinton has now lost interest in Paula R. Jones, because she has gotten too old for him and for most men to want. Regardless of what happened between Juanita Broaddrick and William J. Clinton (if you read my post on her, you’ll see where I neutrally look @ possibilities), you can be sure that William J. Clinton doesn’t want Juanita Broaddrick, as Juanita Broaddrick since the early 1990s is too old for most men to want.

    Most rape/sex abuse cases are usually she says, he says cases where the prosecution argues the woman was forced to have sex & or that the man used criminal threats to get the woman to have sex with him while defense will say that the woman did the sex acts agreed to while they didn’t do what both said no to.

    -sex has alot to do with rape just as money has alot to do with robbery, only that there can be added motives along with sex and money. Have been to rape/sex abuse trials, so know what the prosecutor will say, what the defense lawyer will say, etc. Read a book by Randy Thornhill & Craig T. Palmer on rape. Professor Thornhill is an evolutionary biologist while C.T. Palmer is an anthropologist. The fact is that rape is a crime motivated by sex. Any1 who says that rapists don’t do it for sexual motives is talking rubbish. 84% of rapists say that sex is a main motive. Rapes are found in the animal world. They’re found among insects such as crickets, waterstriders, scorpion flies, etc. They’re found among birds such as mallard ducks & red jungle fowl. They’re also found among primates such as Orangutans. Males rape females for reproductive reasons in the animal world. A male who has problem getting females (such as males who lose mate fights) rape females so as to reproduce.

    Rapists mainly target young women. while rapists can attack women of all ages, most rapists go after women who are girls to 35 years old.75% of women who are raped are under 30 years old, 17 to 20% of women raped are in their 30s & 5 to 8% of women rape victims being 40 or older with most in this group in their 40s. Menopausal or womenopausal women, those 50 & older are 1 to 2% of rape victims. After 40, the woman’s chances of getting raped starts going down significantly. If a man robs a 45 year old woman, he’ll take her money. But if the same man robs a 25 year old woman, then he is more likely to commit rape in addition to robbery. This is true in wars. Soldiers who win a war steal, loot & rape young women. Men rape young women because the woman has something which the man wants & that is sex-which he takes by force or by threatening force.

  5. Anirban (aka Abner) Bhattacharya says:

    Juanita Broaddrick’s rape accusation against ex Pres. William Jefferson Clinton. She says that in 1978 then Gov. William J. Clinton raped her, by biting her lip (assault & battery) and then raping her in a hotel bedroom. She didn’t report this to the cops. Only Juanita and Bill know what happened, but thoughts. No surprise that World Net Daily, Lifesite News, Breitbart and Free Republic along with their posters have discussed Juanita Broaddrick’s rape accusation as though it’s proven, because again those sites are against the Clinton’s regardless of whether the accusations true or false.

    Juanita Broaddrick did not report the alleged rape until many years later and she 1st changed her story. Reporting something 20 years later and changing her story doesn’t mean that she is lying. People sometimes want to go on with their life and not keep talking about this, which is why they could change story. Talking about this many years later does not mean that she is lying, but it does give her time to rehearse. If Juanita Broaddrick is telling the truth, then she should have reported this in 1978, where the police would have arrested William J. Clinton & if there’s enough proof, he would have been convicted of rape.

    Juanita Broaddrick appeared @ a William J. Clinton fundraiser 3 weeks after the alleged rape. Some say that if she was raped then why did she appear in fundraiser for her rapist ? Of course, Juanita Broaddrick appearing @ Clinton’s fundraiser 3 weeks after the alleged rape doesn’t mean William J. Clinton’s innocent. For eg. with domestic violence, we see many cases of women returning to their abusers. With Juanita Broaddrick-could there be another motive as to why she would appear @ William J. Clinton’s fundraiser ? More on that later in post to look @ other reasons why she’d appear.

    With Juanita Broaddrick, has she been raped by other men before? Not uncommon for women and girls who have been raped/sexually abused to have been raped by other men. Women who are domestic violence victims often have had relationships with different men who abuse them & men who abuse their wives and girlfriends often have abused other women.

    Was Juanita Broaddrick a domestic violence victim-did her husband & or boyfriend(s) hit her (assault & battery) ? While Juanita Broaddrick was married, she was having an affair & what kind of relationship did she have with the 2 men? How many men did Juanita Broaddrick have an affair with ? Possible she had an affair with more than 1 man. Possible the lip cuts could have been given to her by William J. Clinton biting her during a kiss, but it’s also possible Juanita Broaddrick got her lip cut after her husband & or the man she was having an affair with hit her . Possible that her husband could have hit her after he found out she was having an affair.

    This gets to what possibly happened between Juanita Broaddrick and William J. Clinton if a rape did not happen. It’s possible that William J. Clinton and Juanita Broaddrick had an affair in 1978 before that hotel incident. Juanita Broaddrick could have wanted to continue affair, but William J. Clinton decided to end the affair. Possible that on that night in the hotel room, Juanita Broaddrick could have met William J. Clinton and started kissing him hoping that he would continue relationship. He could have told her no it’s over which resulted in her lip getting cut & then left. She then appeared in the fundraiser 3 weeks later with the hope that William J. Clinton would change his mind and go back to her, but he didn’t.

    Another possible reason for Juanita Broaddrick’s lip cut (if it did happen) is that Juanita Broaddrick’s husband & or boyfriend could have found out about Juanita Broaddrick’s affair with William J. Clinton and hit her, causing the cut lip. Yes, it’s speculating & it’s only what possibly happened. It’s possible that nothing sexual happened between William J. Clinton and Juanita Broaddrick.

    Since Juanita Broaddrick did not report William J. Clinton to the police, we can only speculate. If she had reported the alleged rape and if there had been a conviction, then we can hopefully know what happened. As she didn’t, then the other things suggested are possible. Regardless of what happened between Juanita Broaddrick and William J. Clinton , you can be sure that William J. Clinton doesn’t want Juanita Broaddrick anymore, as Juanita Broaddrick since the early 1990s is too old for most men to want.

    I did not vote for Hillary Diane Clinton and I did not vote for DJ Trump in the 2016 Presidential election. While WND, Lifesite News and Breitbart do a good job in raising things which most media omits, when it comes to the accusations against Hillary D. Clinton and the rape/sex abuse accusations against ex Pres. William Jefferson Clinton, WND, Lifesite News and Breitbart along with their posters has mainly been the fact that they are against the Clintons regardless of the accusations.

    Hillary Diane Clinton has been critiqued by Breitbart, WND, etc. for her comment saying how rape/sex abuse accusers are to be believed but this is ½ truth in that Hillary Diane Clinton also said that if contrary proof shows the man was innocent, then he is innocent and Hillary also believes each case must be judged individually. As far as Sen. Hillary Diane Clinton defending a man who raped a 12 year old girl in the 1970s, she was doing her job as a defense lawyer. Defense lawyers clients are usually guilty & defense lawyers talk with forked tongue to try to get a guilty client acquitted. It’s a bad job but that’s how the legal system works.

    Ex independent counsel Kenneth Winston Starr (KW Starr) who investigated Pres. Clinton for years eventually ending with failed impeachment attempt in 1999, was a defense lawyer after his job as independent counsel ended, where Kenneth W. Starr defended a man (billionaire) who committed statutory rape on teenage girls and got 18 months in jail, Kenneth W. Starr defended a man who molested girls (he ended up getting 43 years in prison) and KW Starr once represented a convicted murderer on death row-KW Starr succeeded in getting the death penalty case reduced to life without parole.

    Kenneth W. Starr also talked with forked tongue when he worked as a defense lawyer just as Hillary Diane Clinton did when she represented a man who raped a 12 year old girl (that case was plea bargained) but that is how the legal system worked. Breitbart, Lifesite News, WND and Free Republic have not condemned Kenneth W. Starr working as a defense lawyer as they have Hillary D. Clinton, because those sites are against Clintons.

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!